Research · head to head
LabArchives vs Obsidian

LabArchives
Research
Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Obsidian
Research
A powerful knowledge base on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LabArchives the corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.; Obsidian sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app
- They diverge on capability: LabArchives covers Versioned entries, Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LabArchives and Obsidian actually diverge.
| Attribute | LabArchives | Obsidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per user per year | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2020 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LabArchives
- Versioned entries
- Witnessing and signing
- Inventory
- Scheduler
- Education edition
- Single sign-on
- Structured data entry
- DOI and repository publishing
Only in Obsidian
- Bidirectional linking
- Graph view visualization
- Markdown support
- Local file storage
- Plugin ecosystem
- Custom CSS themes
- Templates
- Search and tags
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LabArchives
- A university group that must keep research records after a PhD student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptopnot Obsidian
- A core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and whennot Obsidian
- A small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entriesnot Obsidian
- A teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook worknot Obsidian
Obsidian
- Local-first markdown note taking with no account requirednot LabArchives
- Linking notes into a personal knowledge graphnot LabArchives
- Syncing a vault across devices with end-to-end encryption on the paid add-onnot LabArchives
- Publishing a public site from a vaultnot LabArchives
- Extending the editor with community pluginsnot LabArchives
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LabArchives
- The corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
- Inventory and Scheduler are separate per-user line items, so a lab that assumed one price per person for a working system ends up paying two or three.
- It is now a Dotmatics product inside a large scientific software portfolio, which puts roadmap priority with enterprise pharmaceutical buyers rather than with the academic labs that made it popular.
- The interface is functional rather than pleasant, and adoption typically fails not on features but on researchers quietly continuing to keep notes elsewhere; you need a mandate, not a rollout email.
- Instrument integration is thin compared with dedicated laboratory information management systems, so automated capture from analytical equipment usually still means manual upload or custom scripting.
Obsidian
- Sync is a paid add-on at $4 per month billed annually rather than part of the app
- Publishing to the web is a further $8 per month per site
- Commercial use asks for a $50 per user per year licence, though the vendor states it is not required
- Collaboration is limited compared with a hosted notes tool, since the vault is local files first
Pricing, plan by plan
LabArchives
Free- FreeFree
- Limited storage
- Core notebook and versioning
- Intended for evaluation and individual use
- Professional (Academic)$330/year
- Full ELN with witnessing and signing
- Academic rate per user per year
- Corporate rate is $575 per user per year
- ELN plus Inventory bundle$360/year
- Notebook plus sample and reagent inventory
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $675 per user per year
- Inventory standalone$99/year
- Sample tracking without the notebook
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $199 per user per year
Obsidian
Free- Obsidian Sync$4/month
- Sync notes across devices
- Obsidian Publish$8/month
- Turn notes into a website
Which should you pick?
Choose LabArchives if
- You need versioned entries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want witnessing and signing.
Choose Obsidian if
- You need bidirectional linking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want graph view visualization.
Questions people ask
- Is LabArchives or Obsidian better?
- Neither clearly leads. LabArchives starts at Free and Obsidian at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LabArchives or Obsidian?
- LabArchives starts at Free and Obsidian at Free.
- Does LabArchives or Obsidian run on more platforms?
- LabArchives runs on Web, iOS, Android. Obsidian runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use LabArchives for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is LabArchives best used for?
- LabArchives is most often used for a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop, a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when, a small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entries, a teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook work. Of those, a university group that must keep research records after a phd student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop and a core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when are not what Obsidian is typically brought in for.
- What can LabArchives do that Obsidian cannot?
- LabArchives covers Versioned entries, Witnessing and signing, Inventory, Scheduler. Obsidian covers Bidirectional linking, Graph view visualization, Markdown support, Local file storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LabArchives: Does LabArchives satisfy patent evidence requirements?
Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.
Obsidian: Is Obsidian free?
Yes. The core Obsidian application is 100% free for personal and commercial use with no limitations. You can use unlimited vaults and every core feature without payment.
SourceLabArchives: Who owns LabArchives?
Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.
Obsidian: What file format does Obsidian use?
Obsidian stores every note as a plain Markdown file. Because it uses standard Markdown instead of a proprietary format, your notes remain portable and can be edited with many other Markdown editors.
SourceLabArchives: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.
Obsidian: Can I collaborate with others in Obsidian?
The core application does not include built-in team collaboration features. However, Obsidian offers optional add-ons and can be used with version control systems or cloud storage for collaboration.
SourceLabArchives: Can we export everything if we leave?
Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.
Related pages
More on LabArchives
Other head to heads
- LabArchives vs Florence eBinders
- LabArchives vs Dotmatics
- LabArchives vs Labguru
- LabArchives vs Benchling
- LabArchives vs Sapio Sciences
- LabArchives vs LabVantage
- LabArchives vs Scispot
- LabArchives vs Wolfram Mathematica
- LabArchives vs Castor EDC
- LabArchives vs TetraScience
- LabArchives vs Valispace
- LabArchives vs Elicit
- LabArchives vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- LabArchives vs Zappi
- LabArchives vs Zotero
- LabArchives vs Roam Research
- LabArchives vs Mendeley
- LabArchives vs NVivo
- LabArchives vs Paperpile
- LabArchives vs SurveyMonkey
- LabArchives vs Aurelius
- LabArchives vs Chemaxon
- LabArchives vs Condens
- LabArchives vs DNAnexus
- Obsidian vs Florence eBinders
- Obsidian vs Dotmatics
- Obsidian vs Labguru
- Obsidian vs Benchling
- Obsidian vs Sapio Sciences
- Obsidian vs LabVantage
- Obsidian vs Scispot
- Obsidian vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Obsidian vs Castor EDC
- Obsidian vs TetraScience
- Obsidian vs Valispace
- Obsidian vs Elicit
- Obsidian vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Obsidian vs Zappi
- Obsidian vs Zotero
- Obsidian vs Roam Research
- Obsidian vs Mendeley
- Obsidian vs NVivo
- Obsidian vs Paperpile
- Obsidian vs SurveyMonkey
- Obsidian vs Aurelius
- Obsidian vs Chemaxon
- Obsidian vs Condens
- Obsidian vs DNAnexus
