Research · head to head
Dovetail vs LabArchives

Dovetail
Research
AI-powered customer intelligence and research repository.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

LabArchives
Research
Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dovetail no published mid-market pricing; enterprises must contact sales for custom quotes; LabArchives the corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dovetail and LabArchives actually diverge.
| Attribute | Dovetail | LabArchives |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per user per year |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile, API | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dovetail
Nothing recorded that LabArchives does not also cover.
Only in LabArchives
- Versioned entries
- Witnessing and signing
- Inventory
- Scheduler
- Education edition
- Single sign-on
- Structured data entry
- DOI and repository publishing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dovetail
- Product teams conducting qualitative research and extracting actionable insightsnot LabArchives
- Customer success teams identifying churn drivers through session recordings and feedbacknot LabArchives
- Design and UX teams analysing user feedback to inform product decisionsnot LabArchives
- Marketing teams monitoring sentiment and customer perception trendsnot LabArchives
- Enterprise organisations requiring secure, compliant customer intelligence infrastructurenot LabArchives
LabArchives
- A university group that must keep research records after a PhD student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptopnot Dovetail
- A core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and whennot Dovetail
- A small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entriesnot Dovetail
- A teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook worknot Dovetail
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dovetail
- No published mid-market pricing; enterprises must contact sales for custom quotes
- Free tier strictly limited to one channel and one project; scaling requires Enterprise plan
- Enterprise pricing model opaque; no transparent tier for growing teams
- Free tier includes AI Chat but with basic summaries only; advanced AI features reserved for Enterprise
- No per-seat pricing published; cost model for multi-person teams unclear
LabArchives
- The corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
- Inventory and Scheduler are separate per-user line items, so a lab that assumed one price per person for a working system ends up paying two or three.
- It is now a Dotmatics product inside a large scientific software portfolio, which puts roadmap priority with enterprise pharmaceutical buyers rather than with the academic labs that made it popular.
- The interface is functional rather than pleasant, and adoption typically fails not on features but on researchers quietly continuing to keep notes elsewhere; you need a mandate, not a rollout email.
- Instrument integration is thin compared with dedicated laboratory information management systems, so automated capture from analytical equipment usually still means manual upload or custom scripting.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dovetail
Free- FreeFree
- One channel for feedback tracking
- One project for research
- AI Chat with basic summaries
- Enterprise$undefined/variable
- Unlimited agents, channels, projects and docs
- Advanced dashboards and AI features
- Data redaction and access controls
LabArchives
Free- FreeFree
- Limited storage
- Core notebook and versioning
- Intended for evaluation and individual use
- Professional (Academic)$330/year
- Full ELN with witnessing and signing
- Academic rate per user per year
- Corporate rate is $575 per user per year
- ELN plus Inventory bundle$360/year
- Notebook plus sample and reagent inventory
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $675 per user per year
- Inventory standalone$99/year
- Sample tracking without the notebook
- Academic rate; corporate rate is $199 per user per year
Which should you pick?
Choose LabArchives if
- You need versioned entries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want witnessing and signing.
Questions people ask
- Is Dovetail or LabArchives better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dovetail starts at Free and LabArchives at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dovetail or LabArchives?
- Dovetail starts at Free and LabArchives at Free.
- Does Dovetail or LabArchives run on more platforms?
- Dovetail runs on Web, Mobile, API. LabArchives runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dovetail for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dovetail best used for?
- Dovetail is most often used for product teams conducting qualitative research and extracting actionable insights, customer success teams identifying churn drivers through session recordings and feedback, design and ux teams analysing user feedback to inform product decisions, marketing teams monitoring sentiment and customer perception trends. Of those, product teams conducting qualitative research and extracting actionable insights and customer success teams identifying churn drivers through session recordings and feedback are not what LabArchives is typically brought in for.
- What can Dovetail do that LabArchives cannot?
- LabArchives covers Versioned entries, Witnessing and signing, Inventory, Scheduler.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dovetail: What is included in the free plan?
The free plan includes one channel for feedback tracking, one project for organising research, and AI Chat with basic summaries.
SourceLabArchives: Does LabArchives satisfy patent evidence requirements?
Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.
Dovetail: Does Dovetail have compliance certifications?
Yes. Dovetail is SOC 2 Type II compliant and includes automatic PII redaction and private AI processing for enterprise-grade security.
SourceLabArchives: Who owns LabArchives?
Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.
Dovetail: How many integrations does Dovetail support?
Dovetail connects to 38+ external tools through API, CLI and integrations including Slack and Microsoft Teams.
SourceLabArchives: Is there really a free tier?
Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.
LabArchives: Can we export everything if we leave?
Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.
Related pages
More on LabArchives
Other head to heads
- Dovetail vs Contentsquare
- Dovetail vs SurveySparrow
- Dovetail vs Aurelius
- Dovetail vs Condens
- Dovetail vs Marvin
- Dovetail vs Remesh
- Dovetail vs Mouseflow
- Dovetail vs Reduct
- Dovetail vs Attest
- Dovetail vs SurveyMonkey
- Dovetail vs Roam Research
- Dovetail vs NVivo
- Dovetail vs Scispot
- Dovetail vs Seven Bridges
- Dovetail vs Suzy
- Dovetail vs Terra
- Dovetail vs TetraScience
- Dovetail vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- Dovetail vs Florence eBinders
- Dovetail vs Dotmatics
- Dovetail vs Labguru
- Dovetail vs Benchling
- Dovetail vs Sapio Sciences
- Dovetail vs LabVantage
- Dovetail vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Dovetail vs Castor EDC
- Dovetail vs Valispace
- Dovetail vs Elicit
- Dovetail vs Zappi
- Dovetail vs Zotero
- LabArchives vs Contentsquare
- LabArchives vs SurveySparrow
- LabArchives vs Aurelius
- LabArchives vs Condens
- LabArchives vs Marvin
- LabArchives vs Remesh
- LabArchives vs Mouseflow
- LabArchives vs Reduct
- LabArchives vs Attest
- LabArchives vs SurveyMonkey
- LabArchives vs Roam Research
- LabArchives vs NVivo
- LabArchives vs Scispot
- LabArchives vs Seven Bridges
- LabArchives vs Suzy
- LabArchives vs Terra
- LabArchives vs TetraScience
- LabArchives vs Thermo SampleManager LIMS
- LabArchives vs Florence eBinders
- LabArchives vs Dotmatics
- LabArchives vs Labguru
- LabArchives vs Benchling
- LabArchives vs Sapio Sciences
- LabArchives vs LabVantage
- LabArchives vs Wolfram Mathematica
- LabArchives vs Castor EDC
- LabArchives vs Valispace
- LabArchives vs Elicit
- LabArchives vs Zappi
- LabArchives vs Zotero
