APIs · head to head
Kong vs Recorded Future

Recorded Future
Cybersecurity
Intelligence-driven cybersecurity
- From
- $25000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Recorded Future no pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Recorded Future actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | Recorded Future |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $25000/year |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Web, Api, Cloud |
| Category | APIs | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2010 | 2009 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Recorded Future
- Real-time threat intelligence
- Vulnerability intelligence
- Internet-wide data analysis
- Insikt group intelligence
- Brand intelligence
- API-first platform
- Alert and notification system
- Custom reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Recorded Future
- API development and testingnot Recorded Future
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Recorded Future
Recorded Future
- Threat intelligence and monitoringnot Kong
- Dark web monitoring and brand protectionnot Kong
- Third-party risk managementnot Kong
- Security operations and incident responsenot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Recorded Future
- No pricing published; all three tiers (Core, Professional, Elite) require sales contact for quotes
- Pricing depends on organization size, usage levels, and services in addition to tier selection
- API usage limits vary by package but limits not specified on pricing page
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Recorded Future
$25000/year- Threat Intelligence$25000/year
- Threat feeds
- IP reputation
- Domain analysis
- Vulnerability Intelligence$35000/year
- CVE monitoring
- Patch intelligence
- Vulnerability trending
- Complete Intelligence$50000/year
- All features
- Analyst access
- Dedicated feed
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Recorded Future if
- You need real-time threat intelligence.
- You work on Web, Api, Cloud.
- You also want vulnerability intelligence.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Recorded Future better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Recorded Future at $25000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Recorded Future?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Kong and $25000/year for Recorded Future.
- Does Kong or Recorded Future run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Recorded Future runs on Web, Api, Cloud.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Recorded Future starts at $25000/year.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Recorded Future is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Recorded Future cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Recorded Future covers Real-time threat intelligence, Vulnerability intelligence, Internet-wide data analysis, Insikt group intelligence.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceRecorded Future: What are the main pricing tiers offered by Recorded Future?
Recorded Future offers three tiers: Core (foundational intelligence), Professional (marked most-popular with automation and autonomous threat hunts), and Elite (comprehensive coverage including third-party risk assessment). Specific pricing requires contacting sales.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceRecorded Future: What is included in Recorded Future's Core pricing tier?
Core tier includes cyber operations monitoring with threat and malware insights, digital risk protection covering dark web monitoring and credential detection, and the new digital risk hub. Exact cost depends on organization size and usage.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceRecorded Future: What features does Recorded Future Professional tier add?
Professional tier adds autonomous threat hunts, continuous threat monitoring, automated threat preventions, external intelligence ingestion, and external asset discovery. Pricing is custom-quoted based on organization size and services.
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRecorded Future: How does Recorded Future handle user limits and API access?
Recorded Future does not limit the number of platform users or integrations across any tier. API usage limits vary by package tier but exact limits are not specified on the public pricing page.
SourceRelated pages
More on Recorded Future
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Norton 360
- Kong vs 1Password
- Kong vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Kong vs LastPass
- Kong vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Kong vs IBM QRadar
- Kong vs Qualys VMDR
- Kong vs Tenable
- Kong vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Kong vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Kong vs Darktrace
- Kong vs Proofpoint
- Kong vs NordVPN
- Kong vs Omada Identity
- Kong vs Ory
- Kong vs ProtonVPN
- Kong vs Resolver
- Kong vs Saviynt
- Recorded Future vs Convoy
- Recorded Future vs PocketBase
- Recorded Future vs Appwrite
- Recorded Future vs Hasura
- Recorded Future vs Sanity
- Recorded Future vs Tyk
- Recorded Future vs WSO2 API Manager
- Recorded Future vs Gravitee
- Recorded Future vs Janus Gateway
- Recorded Future vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Recorded Future vs 3scale
- Recorded Future vs Akana
- Recorded Future vs Enable Banking
- Recorded Future vs Flybits
- Recorded Future vs i2c
- Recorded Future vs KeystoneJS
- Recorded Future vs Liveblocks
- Recorded Future vs Moesif
- Recorded Future vs Norton 360
- Recorded Future vs 1Password
- Recorded Future vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Recorded Future vs LastPass
- Recorded Future vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Recorded Future vs IBM QRadar
- Recorded Future vs Qualys VMDR
- Recorded Future vs Tenable
- Recorded Future vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Recorded Future vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Recorded Future vs Darktrace
- Recorded Future vs Proofpoint
- Recorded Future vs NordVPN
- Recorded Future vs Omada Identity
- Recorded Future vs Ory
- Recorded Future vs ProtonVPN
- Recorded Future vs Resolver
- Recorded Future vs Saviynt

