Databases · head to head
Dgraph vs Knack

Dgraph
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed graph database written in Go, maintained by Hypermode, queried through GraphQL or its own DQL language.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Knack
Databases
Hosted no-code database and web app builder priced by stored records and storage, with unlimited user accounts on every plan.
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dgraph has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dgraph sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.; Knack plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.
- They diverge on capability: Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Knack covers Visual database builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dgraph and Knack actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dgraph
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Generated GraphQL API
- DQL query language
- Predicate sharding
- Raft replication
- Distributed ACID transactions
- Written in Go
- Full-text and geo indexing
Only in Knack
- Visual database builder
- User logins and roles
- Page builder
- Unlimited users
- E-commerce
- Automation flows
- Scheduled tasks
- REST API and webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dgraph
- An application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes GraphQLnot Knack
- A knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiationnot Knack
- Recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottlenecknot Knack
- Teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available onenot Knack
Knack
- A member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own recordsnot Dgraph
- Replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal toolnot Dgraph
- Inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed whatnot Dgraph
- A registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modestnot Dgraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dgraph
- Sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.
- Stewardship passed from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode after the original company stopped operating independently, so anyone building on it is betting on a second custodian rather than on the original team's roadmap.
- The GraphQL layer is generated and opinionated, so anything it does not express drops you into DQL, which is a second language your team must learn and which no other database speaks.
- The community is a fraction of Neo4j's, so operational answers, tuning experience, hiring and third-party tooling are all thinner, and unusual failure modes in a Zero and Alpha cluster leave you reading source rather than a forum.
- There is no portable graph standard to migrate to; Cypher, Gremlin and SPARQL are all different query models, so the schema and every query is a rewrite if you later leave, and that cost grows with the application.
Knack
- Plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.
- API access is capped per day, at 1,000 calls on the entry plan and 10,000 at the Corporate tier, so a scheduled sync or a busy automation can exhaust the day's quota before the working day ends and integrations then fail silently.
- The application itself cannot be exported or self-hosted; records can be downloaded but the pages, roles, flows and business logic exist only inside Knack, so outgrowing the platform means rebuilding the app rather than moving it.
- Customisation beyond the builder is limited to injected CSS and JavaScript that Knack's support does not cover, so any non-standard interface behaviour becomes yours to maintain against a DOM the vendor can change without warning.
- Compliance capabilities that regulated buyers assume are baseline, HIPAA and GovCloud options, advanced SSO, IP restrictions and private environments, are gated to the Corporate and Enterprise tiers, so a small regulated pilot cannot legitimately start on an entry plan.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/month
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Knack
$59/month- Starter$59/month
- 20,000 database records
- Unlimited users, tables, fields
- 25 AI credits
- Pro$130/month
- 50,000 database records
- Remove Knack branding
- E-commerce payments
- Corporate$300/month
- 125,000-2.5M database records
- App restore functionality
- Advanced SSO
- Enterprise$null/month
- Dedicated account manager
- HIPAA/GovCloud-based options
- Custom pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Dgraph if
- You need apache 2.0 licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want generated graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Dgraph or Knack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dgraph starts at Free and Knack at $59/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dgraph or Knack?
- Dgraph has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dgraph and $59/month for Knack.
- Does Dgraph or Knack run on more platforms?
- Dgraph runs on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web. Knack runs on Web.
- Can I use Dgraph for free?
- Yes. Dgraph has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Knack starts at $59/month.
- What is Dgraph best used for?
- Dgraph is most often used for an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql, a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation, recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottleneck, teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available one. Of those, an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql and a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation are not what Knack is typically brought in for.
- What can Dgraph do that Knack cannot?
- Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Generated GraphQL API, DQL query language, Predicate sharding. Knack covers Visual database builder, User logins and roles, Page builder, Unlimited users.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dgraph: Is Dgraph open source?
Yes. The current repository is Apache 2.0, which is a permissive OSI licence, and the project is at v25 under Hypermode's maintenance.
Knack: Is Knack charged per user?
No. User accounts are unlimited on all plans. Plans are bounded by stored record count, file storage, API calls per day and automation transactions.
Dgraph: Is it really GraphQL?
It serves a generated GraphQL API, which is real GraphQL for clients. Its native language, DQL, resembles GraphQL syntactically but is Dgraph's own language and is not the GraphQL specification.
Knack: What happens when I exceed the record limit?
You move to a higher tier or reduce stored records. Because the limit is on data rather than people, apps that accumulate history hit it while apps that track a fixed set of entities generally do not.
Dgraph: How does it compare to Neo4j?
Neo4j has the larger ecosystem, Cypher, and far more operational precedent. Dgraph distributes storage across nodes by default and gives you a GraphQL endpoint without writing resolvers. The choice usually turns on whether you need horizontal scale and a GraphQL surface more than you need ecosystem depth.
Knack: Can I export my application or self-host it?
You can export record data. The application itself, its pages, roles, permissions and flows, is not exportable and cannot be self-hosted, so leaving means rebuilding elsewhere.
Dgraph: What does a production cluster look like?
At minimum a set of Zero nodes for coordination and a replicated set of Alpha nodes for data, typically three of each for fault tolerance, which is a meaningfully larger operational footprint than a single graph server.
Knack: Is it suitable for public-facing portals?
That is its strongest case, because logins are unlimited and role-based permissions are built in. The constraint is record volume and API throughput, not audience size.
Dgraph: Who maintains it now?
Hypermode. Dgraph Labs, the original company, no longer operates it, and that change of custodian is the main non-technical risk to weigh.
Knack: Can I use it for regulated data?
HIPAA-aligned and government cloud options exist but only on the Enterprise tier, along with private server environments. Lower tiers should not be used for regulated workloads.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs Airtable
- Dgraph vs PostgreSQL
- Dgraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Dgraph vs Neo4j
- Dgraph vs ArangoDB
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs Cassandra
- Dgraph vs FaunaDB
- Dgraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dgraph vs RavenDB
- Dgraph vs Convex
- Dgraph vs Dragonfly
- Dgraph vs Dremio
- Dgraph vs Fivetran HVR
- Dgraph vs Grist
- Dgraph vs IBM Db2
- Dgraph vs BigQuery
- Dgraph vs DuckDB
- Dgraph vs Immuta
- Dgraph vs Turso
- Dgraph vs Ninox
- Dgraph vs TimescaleDB
- Dgraph vs Apache Pinot
- Dgraph vs Amazon RDS
- Dgraph vs Apache Pulsar
- Dgraph vs Amazon Redshift
- Knack vs Cockroach Labs
- Knack vs Airtable
- Knack vs PostgreSQL
- Knack vs Amazon Aurora
- Knack vs Neo4j
- Knack vs ArangoDB
- Knack vs Elasticsearch
- Knack vs Couchbase
- Knack vs Cassandra
- Knack vs FaunaDB
- Knack vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Knack vs RavenDB
- Knack vs Convex
- Knack vs Dragonfly
- Knack vs Dremio
- Knack vs Fivetran HVR
- Knack vs Grist
- Knack vs IBM Db2
- Knack vs BigQuery
- Knack vs DuckDB
- Knack vs Immuta
- Knack vs Turso
- Knack vs Ninox
- Knack vs TimescaleDB
- Knack vs Apache Pinot
- Knack vs Amazon RDS
- Knack vs Apache Pulsar
- Knack vs Amazon Redshift
