Databases · head to head
Apache Pinot vs Memcached

Apache Pinot
Databases
Real-time distributed OLAP datastore for analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Pinot self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- They diverge on capability: Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Pinot and Memcached actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Pinot | Memcached |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Pinot
- Real-time Analytics
- Column-oriented
- Distributed Processing
- SQL Support
- Pluggable Indexing
- Star-tree Index
- Upsert Support
- Kafka
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Pinot
- Sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested datanot Memcached
- User-facing dashboards inside a productnot Memcached
- Real-time metrics at high ingest ratesnot Memcached
- Petabyte-scale analytics as run at LinkedIn and Ubernot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Apache Pinot
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Apache Pinot
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Apache Pinot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Pinot
- Self-hosted and distributed, so running it means operating a cluster rather than consuming a service
- Managed hosting comes from third parties such as StarTree rather than from the project
- Built for user-facing real-time OLAP, so it is not a general purpose database
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Pinot
Free- Open SourceFree
- Real-time analytics
- SQL queries
- Horizontal scaling
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Pinot if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want column-oriented.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Pinot or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Pinot starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Pinot or Memcached?
- Apache Pinot starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does Apache Pinot or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Apache Pinot runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Apache Pinot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Pinot best used for?
- Apache Pinot is most often used for sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data, user-facing dashboards inside a product, real-time metrics at high ingest rates, petabyte-scale analytics as run at linkedin and uber. Of those, sub-second analytics queries on freshly ingested data and user-facing dashboards inside a product are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Pinot do that Memcached cannot?
- Apache Pinot covers Real-time Analytics, Column-oriented, Distributed Processing, SQL Support. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Pinot: How much does Apache Pinot cost?
Apache Pinot is free and open-source. It is provided under the Apache License, which allows free use, modification, and distribution.
SourceMemcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Apache Pinot: Is Apache Pinot free for commercial use?
Yes. Apache Pinot is licensed under the Apache License, which explicitly permits commercial use at no cost.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Apache Pinot: Can I run Apache Pinot locally or with Docker?
Yes. Apache Pinot offers a Docker quickstart and free downloads of the latest version (1.5.1 at the time of the page). You are responsible for hosting and infrastructure.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Apache Pinot: Are there restrictions on how I can use Apache Pinot?
The Apache License permits unrestricted use, but requires retention of license notices and statements. No usage limits or feature restrictions are enforced.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Pinot
Other head to heads
- Apache Pinot vs ClickHouse
- Apache Pinot vs Tinybird
- Apache Pinot vs Airtable
- Apache Pinot vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Pinot vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Pinot vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Pinot vs SingleStore
- Apache Pinot vs DuckDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebolt
- Apache Pinot vs Estuary
- Apache Pinot vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Pinot vs Materialize
- Apache Pinot vs DataGrip
- Apache Pinot vs Google Cloud SQL
- Apache Pinot vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Apache Pinot vs QuestDB
- Apache Pinot vs Dragonfly
- Apache Pinot vs Valkey
- Apache Pinot vs Readyset
- Apache Pinot vs DynamoDB
- Apache Pinot vs NATS
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Pulsar
- Apache Pinot vs Presto
- Apache Pinot vs Timeplus
- Apache Pinot vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Pinot vs EMQX
- Apache Pinot vs FaunaDB
- Apache Pinot vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Apache Pinot vs MotherDuck
- Apache Pinot vs Neo4j
- Apache Pinot vs Apache Kafka
- Apache Pinot vs Firestore
- Memcached vs ClickHouse
- Memcached vs Tinybird
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs SingleStore
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs Firebolt
- Memcached vs Estuary
- Memcached vs TimescaleDB
- Memcached vs Materialize
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Google Cloud SQL
- Memcached vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Memcached vs QuestDB
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
