Databases · head to head
Memcached vs MySQL
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; MySQL hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, MySQL covers ACID compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and MySQL actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in MySQL
- ACID compliance
- SQL support
- Multi-version concurrency control
- Replication
- Partitioning
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot MySQL
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot MySQL
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot MySQL
MySQL
- Web application backendnot Memcached
- E-commerce platformsnot Memcached
- Content management systemsnot Memcached
- Data warehousingnot Memcached
- Business applicationsnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
MySQL
- Hot online backup is not in the free Community Server; MySQL Enterprise Backup is a paid Enterprise Edition component
- Transparent Data Encryption, data masking and de-identification are Enterprise Edition only
- MySQL Enterprise Firewall, which guards against SQL injection, and MySQL Enterprise Audit are both paid components
- External authentication against PAM or Windows Active Directory requires MySQL Enterprise Authentication
- The thread pool ships as MySQL Enterprise Scalability rather than in the community build
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
MySQL
Free- Community EditionFree
- Open source license
- Full SQL support
- InnoDB storage engine
- Standard Edition$2000/year
- Commercial license
- Oracle Premier Support
- MySQL Enterprise backup
- Enterprise Edition$5000/year
- Advanced security
- MySQL Enterprise Monitor
- High Availability
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose MySQL if
- You need acid compliance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or MySQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and MySQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or MySQL?
- Memcached starts at Free and MySQL at Free.
- Does Memcached or MySQL run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. MySQL runs on Windows, Macos, Linux, Unix.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what MySQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that MySQL cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. MySQL covers ACID compliance, SQL support, Multi-version concurrency control, Replication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
MySQL: Does MySQL cost money?
MySQL is primarily open-source and free to use. Commercial editions and support services are available but pricing is not published on the main website.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
MySQL: How do I get MySQL pricing information?
For MySQL commercial editions and support pricing, customers can contact MySQL sales directly at +1-866-221-0634 or navigate to individual product pages.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Django
- Memcached vs Laravel
- Memcached vs Nginx
- Memcached vs npm
- Memcached vs Bolt.new
- Memcached vs Ruby on Rails
- Memcached vs Next.js
- Memcached vs Flask
- Memcached vs Nuxt
- Memcached vs PHP
- Memcached vs Spring Boot
- Memcached vs Node.js
- Memcached vs Wix
- Memcached vs Apache HTTP Server
- Memcached vs v0 by Vercel
- Memcached vs Wix Studio
- MySQL vs Dragonfly
- MySQL vs Valkey
- MySQL vs Readyset
- MySQL vs PostgreSQL
- MySQL vs DuckDB
- MySQL vs DynamoDB
- MySQL vs NATS
- MySQL vs Apache Pulsar
- MySQL vs Presto
- MySQL vs Timeplus
- MySQL vs RabbitMQ
- MySQL vs EMQX
- MySQL vs FaunaDB
- MySQL vs Firebase Realtime Database
- MySQL vs MotherDuck
- MySQL vs Neo4j
- MySQL vs Apache Kafka
- MySQL vs Firestore
- MySQL vs Django
- MySQL vs Laravel
- MySQL vs Nginx
- MySQL vs npm
- MySQL vs Bolt.new
- MySQL vs Ruby on Rails
- MySQL vs Next.js
- MySQL vs Flask
- MySQL vs Nuxt
- MySQL vs PHP
- MySQL vs Spring Boot
- MySQL vs Node.js
- MySQL vs Wix
- MySQL vs Apache HTTP Server
- MySQL vs v0 by Vercel
- MySQL vs Wix Studio

