Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Supabase

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Supabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Supabase does not also cover.
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Supabase
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Supabase
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Supabase
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Supabase
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Keycloak
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Keycloak
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Keycloak
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Keycloak
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Supabase?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Supabase run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Supabase cannot?
- Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceSupabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceSupabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs Asana
- Keycloak vs ClickUp
- Keycloak vs Linear
- Keycloak vs Figma
- Keycloak vs Kubernetes
- Keycloak vs Notion
- Keycloak vs Datadog
- Keycloak vs Monday.com
- Keycloak vs Terraform
- Keycloak vs Docker
- Keycloak vs Greenhouse
- Keycloak vs Google Chrome
- Keycloak vs Intercom
- Keycloak vs Mozilla Firefox
- Keycloak vs Okta
- Keycloak vs PostHog
- Keycloak vs Redis
- Keycloak vs Amplitude
- Supabase vs Visual Studio Code
- Supabase vs ESLint
- Supabase vs pnpm
- Supabase vs Turborepo
- Supabase vs GitHub Copilot
- Supabase vs Penpot
- Supabase vs Rust
- Supabase vs CLion
- Supabase vs GNAT Pro
- Supabase vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Supabase vs GNU Emacs
- Supabase vs Keil MDK
- Supabase vs Vite
- Supabase vs Bazel
- Supabase vs CodeSandbox
- Supabase vs Eclipse IDE
- Supabase vs Moonrepo
- Supabase vs Nx Cloud
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Kubernetes
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs Datadog
- Supabase vs Monday.com
- Supabase vs Terraform
- Supabase vs Docker
- Supabase vs Greenhouse
- Supabase vs Google Chrome
- Supabase vs Intercom
- Supabase vs Mozilla Firefox
- Supabase vs Okta
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Amplitude

