Technology · head to head
Supabase vs Vite
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity; Vite does not support Node.js built-in polyfills, requiring manual configuration for CommonJS libraries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Supabase and Vite actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), founded (2020).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
Only in Vite
Nothing recorded that Supabase does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Vite
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Vite
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Vite
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Vite
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Vite
Vite
- Developers speeding up hot module replacement during React developmentnot Supabase
- Vue.js teams reducing rebuild times in large monorepo codebasesnot Supabase
- Teams building with TypeScript without additional tooling configurationnot Supabase
- Open-source contributors testing code changes in sub-second feedbacknot Supabase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Vite
- Does not support Node.js built-in polyfills, requiring manual configuration for CommonJS libraries
- File watching fails on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 in certain conditions
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to webpack
- Ampersands in Windows project paths cause module resolution failures
Pricing, plan by plan
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Vite
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Vite review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Supabase or Vite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Supabase starts at Free and Vite at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Supabase or Vite?
- Supabase starts at Free and Vite at Free.
- Does Supabase or Vite run on more platforms?
- Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android. Vite runs on Node.js, Deno, Bun.
- Can I use Supabase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Supabase best used for?
- Supabase is most often used for web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis, mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries, ai applications using vector/embeddings storage, authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/password. Of those, web application backends using postgres plus auto-generated rest/graphql apis and mobile app backends via flutter/swift/kotlin client libraries are not what Vite is typically brought in for.
- What can Supabase do that Vite cannot?
- Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceVite: Does Vite support CommonJS dependencies?
Vite automatically converts CommonJS dependencies to ES modules during pre-bundling using esbuild, but it does not support Node.js built-in polyfills. For projects requiring Node builtins, additional configuration may be needed.
SourceSupabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceVite: Can Vite work offline?
Vite requires internet for initial dependency pre-bundling with esbuild. Once dependencies are pre-bundled and cached, development can continue with local file serving, but full offline development is not supported.
SourceVite: What are Vite's system requirements on Windows?
Vite can run on Windows, but WSL2 users may experience file watching issues where Vite cannot detect file changes in certain conditions. Windows users with project paths containing ampersands may encounter module resolution failures with npm.
SourceVite: Does Vite support TypeScript, JSX, and CSS out of the box?
Yes. Vite natively supports TypeScript, JSX, CSS, and WebAssembly without additional configuration needed for basic use.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Kubernetes
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs Datadog
- Supabase vs Monday.com
- Supabase vs Terraform
- Supabase vs Docker
- Supabase vs Greenhouse
- Supabase vs Google Chrome
- Supabase vs Intercom
- Supabase vs Mozilla Firefox
- Supabase vs Okta
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Amplitude
- Supabase vs Visual Studio Code
- Supabase vs ESLint
- Supabase vs pnpm
- Supabase vs Turborepo
- Supabase vs GitHub Copilot
- Supabase vs Penpot
- Supabase vs Keycloak
- Supabase vs Rust
- Supabase vs CLion
- Supabase vs GNAT Pro
- Supabase vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Supabase vs GNU Emacs
- Supabase vs Keil MDK
- Supabase vs Bazel
- Supabase vs CodeSandbox
- Supabase vs Eclipse IDE
- Supabase vs Moonrepo
- Supabase vs Nx Cloud
- Vite vs Asana
- Vite vs ClickUp
- Vite vs Linear
- Vite vs Figma
- Vite vs Kubernetes
- Vite vs Notion
- Vite vs Datadog
- Vite vs Monday.com
- Vite vs Terraform
- Vite vs Docker
- Vite vs Greenhouse
- Vite vs Google Chrome
- Vite vs Intercom
- Vite vs Mozilla Firefox
- Vite vs Okta
- Vite vs PostHog
- Vite vs Redis
- Vite vs Amplitude
- Vite vs Visual Studio Code
- Vite vs ESLint
- Vite vs pnpm
- Vite vs Turborepo
- Vite vs GitHub Copilot
- Vite vs Penpot
- Vite vs Keycloak
- Vite vs Rust
- Vite vs CLion
- Vite vs GNAT Pro
- Vite vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Vite vs GNU Emacs
- Vite vs Keil MDK
- Vite vs Bazel
- Vite vs CodeSandbox
- Vite vs Eclipse IDE
- Vite vs Moonrepo
- Vite vs Nx Cloud


