Developer Tools · head to head
Atlantis vs Supabase

Atlantis
Developer Tools
Runs Terraform plan and apply from pull request comments, self-hosted and free
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Atlantis there is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.; Supabase free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- They diverge on capability: Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Supabase covers PostgreSQL database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Atlantis and Supabase actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Atlantis
- Pull request plans
- Comment driven apply
- Workspace locking
- Policy checking
- Multi-platform webhooks
- Custom workflows
Only in Supabase
- PostgreSQL database
- Auto-generated APIs
- Authentication & authorization
- Real-time subscriptions
- Storage
- Edge functions
- Vector embeddings
- Database migrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Atlantis
- Making Terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approvernot Supabase
- Removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keysnot Supabase
- Getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platformnot Supabase
- Enforcing Conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can runnot Supabase
Supabase
- Web application backends using Postgres plus auto-generated REST/GraphQL APIsnot Atlantis
- Mobile app backends via Flutter/Swift/Kotlin client librariesnot Atlantis
- AI applications using vector/embeddings storagenot Atlantis
- Authentication with 20+ social providers plus email/passwordnot Atlantis
- File and media storage (S3-compatible with CDN) and realtime sync over WebSocketsnot Atlantis
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Atlantis
- There is no company, no service level agreement and no paid support at any price, and the six maintainers are volunteers with day jobs, which some risk committees will not accept for a component holding production cloud credentials.
- The security surface is inherently sharp, because it is an internet-reachable webhook endpoint that executes applies with privileged credentials, gated by pull request comment authorisation that is coarse next to a real policy engine.
- It is stateful, holding a working directory and lock database on local disk, so high availability and horizontal scaling are awkward and you own upgrades, webhook plumbing, secret rotation and the host itself.
- It lacks the features that distinguish the commercial alternatives, with no native drift detection, no cost estimation, no managed state interface and no policy engine beyond the Conftest integration.
- Terragrunt and monorepo layouts are not first-class, requiring hand-written custom workflows and repository configuration that becomes a growing maintenance burden as the number of repositories increases.
Supabase
- Free tier projects auto-pause after 1 week of inactivity
- Free tier hard caps: 500 MB database, 1 GB file storage, 5 GB egress/month, 50,000 monthly active users, max 2 active free projects per organization
- Pro plan charges usage overages beyond included quotas, e.g. $0.00325 per MAU above 100,000 and $0.125/GB disk above 8 GB
- SOC2/ISO 27001 certification and HIPAA (add-on) compliance require the $599/month Team plan; not available on the $25/month Pro plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Atlantis
Free- AtlantisFree
- Apache-2.0, no usage limits and no seat count
- No commercial edition and no paid support tier
- Community support through GitHub and the CNCF Slack channel
Supabase
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 MAU
- 500MB database
- 5GB egress
- Pro$25/month
- 100,000 MAU
- 8GB disk
- 250GB egress
- Team$599/month
- SOC2 and ISO 27001
- HIPAA add-on
- 28-day log / 14-day backup retention
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom limits
- Dedicated support manager
- 24/7/365 support
Which should you pick?
Choose Atlantis if
- You need pull request plans.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want comment driven apply.
Choose Supabase if
- You need postgresql database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want auto-generated apis.
Questions people ask
- Is Atlantis or Supabase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Atlantis starts at Free and Supabase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Atlantis or Supabase?
- Atlantis starts at Free and Supabase at Free.
- Does Atlantis or Supabase run on more platforms?
- Atlantis runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Supabase runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Atlantis for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Atlantis best used for?
- Atlantis is most often used for making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver, removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys, getting pull request driven infrastructure without paying a per-user subscription for a hosted platform, enforcing conftest policies as a blocking check before an apply can run. Of those, making terraform review meaningful by putting the actual plan output in front of the approver and removing local applies and the credential sprawl that comes with every engineer holding production keys are not what Supabase is typically brought in for.
- What can Atlantis do that Supabase cannot?
- Atlantis covers Pull request plans, Comment driven apply, Workspace locking, Policy checking. Supabase covers PostgreSQL database, Auto-generated APIs, Authentication & authorization, Real-time subscriptions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Atlantis: Is there a company behind Atlantis?
No. It runs as a series of LF Projects under the Linux Foundation and is maintained by volunteers. There is no vendor to buy support from and no service level agreement.
Supabase: How much does Supabase cost?
Supabase offers a free tier and three paid plans. Pro starts at $25 per month, Team at $599 per month, and Enterprise requires a custom quote. All pricing is in USD charged monthly.
SourceAtlantis: Is it a CNCF project?
No. It uses a channel in the CNCF Slack, which is often misread as membership, but the project sits under LF Projects rather than the CNCF.
Supabase: What are Supabase's usage overage fees?
Pro plan users pay $0.00325 per monthly active user over the 100,000 included, and $0.125 per GB for database storage exceeding 8 GB per project. Compute instances cost $10 to $3,730+ per month.
SourceAtlantis: Does it work with OpenTofu?
Yes, there is a dedicated integration guide alongside Terraform, and it also has configuration for working with hosted Terraform backends.
Atlantis: What does it not do that a paid platform does?
Drift detection, cost estimation, a managed state and run interface, and a real policy engine. Atlantis does pull request plan and apply well and stops there.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Atlantis vs Spacelift
- Atlantis vs HCP Terraform
- Atlantis vs Harness
- Atlantis vs Jitsu
- Atlantis vs Visual Studio Code
- Atlantis vs Tilt
- Atlantis vs Soketi
- Atlantis vs Pants Build
- Atlantis vs Steampipe
- Atlantis vs Refact
- Atlantis vs Penpot
- Atlantis vs GNU Emacs
- Atlantis vs JFrog Artifactory
- Atlantis vs Namespace
- Atlantis vs Nix
- Atlantis vs Nixpacks
- Atlantis vs Octopus Deploy
- Atlantis vs Okteto
- Atlantis vs Asana
- Atlantis vs ClickUp
- Atlantis vs Figma
- Atlantis vs Linear
- Atlantis vs Postgres
- Atlantis vs Redis
- Atlantis vs Excalidraw
- Atlantis vs MongoDB
- Atlantis vs Notion
- Atlantis vs PostHog
- Atlantis vs GitHub
- Atlantis vs Apache Hadoop
- Atlantis vs Height
- Atlantis vs Honeycomb
- Atlantis vs Istio
- Atlantis vs Lucidchart
- Atlantis vs GitHub Desktop
- Supabase vs Spacelift
- Supabase vs HCP Terraform
- Supabase vs Harness
- Supabase vs Jitsu
- Supabase vs Visual Studio Code
- Supabase vs Tilt
- Supabase vs Soketi
- Supabase vs Pants Build
- Supabase vs Steampipe
- Supabase vs Refact
- Supabase vs Penpot
- Supabase vs GNU Emacs
- Supabase vs JFrog Artifactory
- Supabase vs Namespace
- Supabase vs Nix
- Supabase vs Nixpacks
- Supabase vs Octopus Deploy
- Supabase vs Okteto
- Supabase vs Asana
- Supabase vs ClickUp
- Supabase vs Figma
- Supabase vs Linear
- Supabase vs Postgres
- Supabase vs Redis
- Supabase vs Excalidraw
- Supabase vs MongoDB
- Supabase vs Notion
- Supabase vs PostHog
- Supabase vs GitHub
- Supabase vs Apache Hadoop
- Supabase vs Height
- Supabase vs Honeycomb
- Supabase vs Istio
- Supabase vs Lucidchart
- Supabase vs GitHub Desktop

