APIs · head to head
Janus Gateway vs Rowy

Janus Gateway
APIs
WebRTC gateway and media server for real-time communication
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Rowy
Spreadsheets
Spreadsheet interface for Google Cloud Firestore with cloud functions written in the browser
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Janus Gateway no commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings; Rowy every Firestore limit is inherited, including the one megabyte per document ceiling and roughly one sustained write per second per document, which surprises users who expect spreadsheet behaviour.
- They diverge on capability: Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, Rowy covers Firestore backed grid.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Janus Gateway and Rowy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Janus Gateway | Rowy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, MacOS, BSD | Web |
| Category | APIs | Spreadsheets |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Janus Gateway
- WebRTC Gateway
- Media Routing
- Video Conferencing
- RTP
- SRTP
- REST API
- Linux support
- MacOS support
Only in Rowy
- Firestore backed grid
- Browser authored cloud functions
- Typed columns
- Runs in your Google Cloud project
- Role based access
- Form view
- Open source
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Janus Gateway
- API Developmentnot Rowy
- API Gatewaynot Rowy
- API Testingnot Rowy
- API Documentationnot Rowy
- Microservicesnot Rowy
Rowy
- A Firebase application that needs an internal admin interface without building onenot Janus Gateway
- Operations staff correcting production records in Firestore without developer involvementnot Janus Gateway
- Attaching a small transformation or notification function to a field change without a full deployment pipelinenot Janus Gateway
- A content team populating documents that a mobile application reads directly from Firestorenot Janus Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Janus Gateway
- No commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- Community-supported only; no vendor commercial support or SLA available
Rowy
- Every Firestore limit is inherited, including the one megabyte per document ceiling and roughly one sustained write per second per document, which surprises users who expect spreadsheet behaviour.
- Firestore has no joins, so linking tables in the grid is a convenience layer rather than a relational feature and reports across collections still need a separate query.
- It is useful only to teams already on Firebase, so choosing it effectively locks the operational tooling to one cloud vendor.
- Query costs are billed by document read, and an unfiltered grid on a large collection can generate a bill that a spreadsheet user has no intuition for.
- Development activity has slowed relative to the broader category, so evaluate current maintenance before making it load bearing for internal operations.
Pricing, plan by plan
Janus Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core WebRTC gateway
- Community support
Rowy
Free- Open source self hostedFree
- No licence fee
- Deploys into your own Google Cloud project
- You pay Google Cloud for Firestore reads, writes and storage
Which should you pick?
Choose Janus Gateway if
- You need webrtc gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- You also want media routing.
Choose Rowy if
- You need firestore backed grid.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want browser authored cloud functions.
Questions people ask
- Is Janus Gateway or Rowy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Janus Gateway starts at Free and Rowy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Janus Gateway or Rowy?
- Janus Gateway starts at Free and Rowy at Free.
- Does Janus Gateway or Rowy run on more platforms?
- Janus Gateway runs on Linux, MacOS, BSD. Rowy runs on Web.
- Can I use Janus Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Janus Gateway best used for?
- Janus Gateway is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Rowy is typically brought in for.
- What can Janus Gateway do that Rowy cannot?
- Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, Media Routing, Video Conferencing, RTP. Rowy covers Firestore backed grid, Browser authored cloud functions, Typed columns, Runs in your Google Cloud project.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Janus Gateway: How much does Janus Gateway cost?
Janus Gateway has no pricing model; it is a free open-source WebRTC server developed by Meetecho. The general-purpose server is available for download at no cost. There are no subscription tiers or commercial licensing fees.
SourceRowy: Where is my data stored?
In your own Firestore instance inside your own Google Cloud project. Rowy does not hold a copy.
Janus Gateway: Is Janus Gateway supported commercially?
Janus Gateway is community-supported open-source software with no official commercial support or SLA from the vendors. While Meetecho developed the project, users must rely on community documentation and forums for assistance.
SourceRowy: What does it cost to run?
No licence fee. You pay Google Cloud for Firestore reads, writes, storage and function invocations, and an open grid on a big collection reads a lot.
Rowy: Can it do joins across collections?
Not really. Firestore does not support joins, and no interface layer can add them.
Rowy: Is there a row limit?
Not from Rowy. The limits that bite are Firestore document size and per document write throughput.
Rowy: Is it suitable if I am not on Firebase?
No. It is specifically a Firestore interface.
Related pages
More on Janus Gateway
Other head to heads
- Janus Gateway vs Hasura
- Janus Gateway vs PocketBase
- Janus Gateway vs Appwrite
- Janus Gateway vs Sanity
- Janus Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Convoy
- Janus Gateway vs Tyk
- Janus Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Gravitee
- Janus Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Janus Gateway vs Parse Server
- Janus Gateway vs Fintech Farm
- Janus Gateway vs Fintecture
- Janus Gateway vs Formance
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Playground
- Janus Gateway vs Kong
- Janus Gateway vs Baserow
- Janus Gateway vs Mathesar
- Janus Gateway vs Budibase
- Janus Gateway vs APITable
- Janus Gateway vs Teable
- Janus Gateway vs Quadratic
- Janus Gateway vs Fibery
- Janus Gateway vs Google Sheets
- Janus Gateway vs Numbers
- Janus Gateway vs Zoho Sheet
- Janus Gateway vs Coefficient
- Janus Gateway vs Sigma Computing
- Janus Gateway vs Equals
- Janus Gateway vs Cube Software
- Rowy vs Hasura
- Rowy vs PocketBase
- Rowy vs Appwrite
- Rowy vs Sanity
- Rowy vs Kong Gateway
- Rowy vs Convoy
- Rowy vs Tyk
- Rowy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Rowy vs Gravitee
- Rowy vs Asyncapi
- Rowy vs Parse Server
- Rowy vs Fintech Farm
- Rowy vs Fintecture
- Rowy vs Formance
- Rowy vs GraphQL Apollo
- Rowy vs GraphQL Playground
- Rowy vs Kong
- Rowy vs Baserow
- Rowy vs Mathesar
- Rowy vs Budibase
- Rowy vs APITable
- Rowy vs Teable
- Rowy vs Quadratic
- Rowy vs Fibery
- Rowy vs Google Sheets
- Rowy vs Numbers
- Rowy vs Zoho Sheet
- Rowy vs Coefficient
- Rowy vs Sigma Computing
- Rowy vs Equals
- Rowy vs Cube Software
