Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Integromat vs Tinybird

Integromat logo

Integromat

Automation Integration

Automate your workflow

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Tinybird logo

Tinybird

Databases

Managed ClickHouse with a workflow that turns SQL queries into hosted HTTP APIs

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying; Tinybird it is ClickHouse underneath, so it inherits ClickHouse limits: multi-table joins degrade badly at scale, updates and deletes are expensive mutations rather than cheap operations, and a poorly chosen sorting key at table creation cannot be fixed without rebuilding the data.
  • They diverge on capability: Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Tinybird covers Managed ClickHouse.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Integromat and Tinybird actually diverge.

Attributes where Integromat and Tinybird differ
AttributeIntegromatTinybird
Pricing modelfreemiumPer month by compute and storage
PlatformsWeb, ApiWeb, Cloud, Linux, macOS
CategoryAutomation IntegrationDatabases
Founded2013Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Integromat

  • Visual workflow builder
  • Webhooks
  • Data transformation
  • Error handling
  • Conditional logic
  • Scheduling
  • Team collaboration
  • 1000+ apps

Only in Tinybird

  • Managed ClickHouse
  • Pipes as APIs
  • Events HTTP endpoint
  • Streaming connectors
  • Materialized views
  • Git-based workflow
  • Token-scoped auth
  • Observability

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Integromat

  • workflow automationnot Tinybird
  • integration between appsnot Tinybird
  • task automationnot Tinybird

Tinybird

  • A SaaS product adding a per-customer usage dashboard that must render in under a second across billions of eventsnot Integromat
  • A team building rate limiting or fraud checks that need an aggregate over the last few minutes returned inside a request cyclenot Integromat
  • A data team offloading interactive operational dashboards from Snowflake, where per-query warehouse cost makes constant refresh untenablenot Integromat
  • A game or ad-tech company ingesting a high-volume event stream and exposing live counters back to customers through an APInot Integromat

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Integromat

  • The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
  • Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
  • Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
  • Make API access requires a paid plan
  • Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
  • Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges

Tinybird

  • It is ClickHouse underneath, so it inherits ClickHouse limits: multi-table joins degrade badly at scale, updates and deletes are expensive mutations rather than cheap operations, and a poorly chosen sorting key at table creation cannot be fixed without rebuilding the data.
  • Compute is metered per vCPU-second with overage at 0.0002 USD per second, so an inefficient query shipped to production shows up directly on the invoice rather than merely running slowly.
  • Only the Enterprise tier gets horizontal scaling and dedicated infrastructure; Free, Developer and SaaS all run on shared infrastructure with vertical scaling only, which caps both isolation and headroom for anyone not on a custom contract.
  • Storage is billed at 0.058 USD per gigabyte on top of compute, and egress is charged separately at 0.01 USD per gigabyte intra-cloud and 0.10 USD inter-cloud, so a high-fanout API serving many small responses accrues costs in three places at once.
  • You are building on a proprietary workflow around an open database: the pipes, tokens and API layer are Tinybird specific, so leaving means keeping your data but rewriting the entire serving layer you adopted Tinybird to avoid writing.

Pricing, plan by plan

Integromat

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 1000 credits monthly
    • basic workflow builder
    • access to 3000+ apps
  • Core$9/month
    • 10k credits
    • unlimited active scenarios
    • scheduled scenarios down to the minute
  • Pro$16/month
    • 10k credits
    • priority execution
    • custom variables
  • Teams$29/month
    • 10k credits
    • team collaboration
    • team roles

Tinybird

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 0.25 vCPU on shared infrastructure
    • 10 GB storage included
    • 1,000 requests per day
  • Developer$25/month
    • 0.5 vCPU scaling to 8 vCPU
    • 25 GB storage included
    • Two replicas
  • SaaS$undefined/month
    • Up to 32 vCPU
    • 500 GB storage included
    • Four to sixteen threads per request
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Unlimited vCPU and bottomless storage
    • Dedicated infrastructure and private regions
    • Vertical and horizontal scaling

Which should you pick?

Choose Integromat if

  • You need visual workflow builder.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want webhooks.
Integromat review

Choose Tinybird if

  • You need managed clickhouse.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Cloud, Linux, macOS.
  • You also want pipes as apis.
Tinybird review

Questions people ask

Is Integromat or Tinybird better?
Neither clearly leads. Integromat starts at Free and Tinybird at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Integromat or Tinybird?
Integromat starts at Free and Tinybird at Free.
Does Integromat or Tinybird run on more platforms?
Integromat runs on Web, Api. Tinybird runs on Web, Cloud, Linux, macOS.
Can I use Integromat for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Integromat best used for?
Integromat is most often used for workflow automation, integration between apps, task automation. Of those, workflow automation and integration between apps are not what Tinybird is typically brought in for.
What can Integromat do that Tinybird cannot?
Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling. Tinybird covers Managed ClickHouse, Pipes as APIs, Events HTTP endpoint, Streaming connectors.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Integromat: What is the free tier for Make?

Make's free tier provides 1,000 credits monthly, access to 3,000+ apps, a basic no-code workflow builder, and a 15-minute minimum interval between scenario runs.

Source
Tinybird: Is Tinybird just hosted ClickHouse?

No. The database is ClickHouse, but the product is the layer above it: publishing parameterised SQL as authenticated, rate-limited REST endpoints without writing an API server.

Integromat: Can I save money with annual billing on Make?

Yes, Make offers 15% or more savings when paying annually instead of monthly billing.

Source
Tinybird: What does it actually cost?

Free tier at 1,000 requests a day, Developer from 25 USD a month, then compute at 0.0002 USD per vCPU-second and storage at 0.058 USD per gigabyte. Higher tiers are quoted.

Integromat: How does Make's credit system work?

Each module action in Make consumes credits, with most basic actions using one credit per execution. Credits expire monthly for monthly plans or annually for yearly subscriptions.

Source
Tinybird: Can I run it on my own infrastructure?

Only on Enterprise, which offers dedicated infrastructure and private regions. Lower tiers are shared multi-tenant cloud.

Tinybird: Does it handle updates and deletes?

Poorly, as ClickHouse does. Design for append-only event data; frequent mutation is the wrong workload for this engine.

Share

Related pages

More on Integromat

More on Tinybird

Keep looking

Other head to heads