Legal · head to head
Aderant vs Relativity

Aderant
Legal
Practice and financial management for large law firms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Relativity
Legal
Ediscovery and legal data platform for large matters
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Aderant implementation is a programme of work with consultants and data migration, so the licence fee is a minority of the real first year cost.; Relativity quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- They diverge on capability: Aderant covers Aderant Expert, Relativity covers Large-scale processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aderant and Relativity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Aderant | Relativity |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web, Cloud, Self-hosted |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aderant
- Aderant Expert
- Conflicts and new business intake
- Docketing and calendaring
- Multi-currency and multi-entity billing
- Business intelligence
Only in Relativity
- Large-scale processing
- Review workflow
- Analytics and active learning
- Application ecosystem
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aderant
- Firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currenciesnot Relativity
- Practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segmentnot Relativity
- Firms needing conflicts checking and new business intake governed by an approval workflownot Relativity
- Partnerships reporting profitability by practice group and requiring realisation analysisnot Relativity
Relativity
- Large litigation with very high document volumesnot Aderant
- Corporate investigations requiring defensible, auditable reviewnot Aderant
- Firms whose review process is already built around the platformnot Aderant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aderant
- Implementation is a programme of work with consultants and data migration, so the licence fee is a minority of the real first year cost.
- It is designed for large firms, so a practice below roughly fifty fee earners pays for governance and reporting depth it will never use.
- Ownership by an acquisitive holding company tends to mean predictable maintenance uplifts at renewal rather than competitive discounting.
- The credible alternative set is effectively one other product, which weakens a firm's negotiating position because switching is genuinely expensive.
- Nothing about pricing is published, so budgeting requires a sales engagement and useful comparisons come only from peer firms.
Relativity
- Quote-only and expensive, typically billed on data volume, so costs escalate with matter size
- Complex enough that certified specialists are a job title, which is a real staffing cost
- Considerable overkill for small matters, where lighter self-service tools are far cheaper
Pricing, plan by plan
Aderant
On request- Aderant Expert$undefined/year
- Enterprise licensing quoted per firm
- Implementation, migration and consultancy quoted separately
- Annual maintenance and support
Relativity
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Relativity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Aderant if
- You need aderant expert.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want conflicts and new business intake.
Choose Relativity if
- You need large-scale processing.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- You also want review workflow.
Questions people ask
- Is Aderant or Relativity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aderant starts at On request and Relativity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aderant or Relativity?
- Aderant starts at On request and Relativity at On request.
- Does Aderant or Relativity run on more platforms?
- Aderant runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Relativity runs on Web, Cloud, Self-hosted.
- What is Aderant best used for?
- Aderant is most often used for firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currencies, practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segment, firms needing conflicts checking and new business intake governed by an approval workflow, partnerships reporting profitability by practice group and requiring realisation analysis. Of those, firms of a hundred or more fee earners needing matter financials across multiple offices and currencies and practices replacing an ageing time and billing system without leaving the large firm segment are not what Relativity is typically brought in for.
- What can Aderant do that Relativity cannot?
- Aderant covers Aderant Expert, Conflicts and new business intake, Docketing and calendaring, Multi-currency and multi-entity billing. Relativity covers Large-scale processing, Review workflow, Analytics and active learning, Application ecosystem.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aderant: Who owns Aderant?
Roper Technologies acquired Aderant in 2015. Roper buys and holds vertical market software businesses, which in practice means long product support and steady renewal pricing rather than rapid change.
Relativity: What does Relativity cost?
It does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally billed on data volume and users, quoted per matter or organisation.
Aderant: What size of firm is Aderant for?
Large firms, broadly a hundred fee earners and above. Smaller practices are better served by Clio, Tabs3 or Smokeball.
Relativity: Is Relativity only for law firms?
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.
Aderant: What does it compete with?
Thomson Reuters Elite 3E is the main alternative at this size, and most large firm selections come down to those two.
Relativity: Do I need trained staff?
In practice yes. Relativity certification is a recognised specialism, and that staffing cost is part of the total.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aderant vs Clio
- Aderant vs CosmoLex
- Aderant vs NetDocuments
- Aderant vs Tabs3
- Aderant vs Smokeball
- Aderant vs Rocket Matter
- Aderant vs Intapp
- Aderant vs iManage
- Aderant vs Lawmatics
- Aderant vs MyCase
- Aderant vs Cookiebot
- Aderant vs Docketwise
- Aderant vs LexisNexis
- Aderant vs Luminance
- Aderant vs Actionstep
- Aderant vs DISCO
- Aderant vs Everlaw
- Aderant vs Logikcull
- Aderant vs Westlaw
- Aderant vs Harvey
- Aderant vs Litera
- Aderant vs Filevine
- Aderant vs CASEpeer
- Aderant vs Ironclad
- Relativity vs Clio
- Relativity vs CosmoLex
- Relativity vs NetDocuments
- Relativity vs Tabs3
- Relativity vs Smokeball
- Relativity vs Rocket Matter
- Relativity vs Intapp
- Relativity vs iManage
- Relativity vs Lawmatics
- Relativity vs MyCase
- Relativity vs Cookiebot
- Relativity vs Docketwise
- Relativity vs LexisNexis
- Relativity vs Luminance
- Relativity vs Actionstep
- Relativity vs DISCO
- Relativity vs Everlaw
- Relativity vs Logikcull
- Relativity vs Westlaw
- Relativity vs Harvey
- Relativity vs Litera
- Relativity vs Filevine
- Relativity vs CASEpeer
- Relativity vs Ironclad
