Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Decodable vs Inngest

Decodable logo

Decodable

Automation Integration

Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Inngest logo

Inngest

Automation Integration

Unbreakable Agents. Invisible Infra.

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Decodable credit pricing rewards intermittent work and penalises always-on pipelines: a single small task running continuously costs roughly 86 US dollars a month before any parallelism.; Inngest hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Decodable and Inngest actually diverge.

Attributes where Decodable and Inngest differ
AttributeDecodableInngest
Pricing modelPer credit by task hourfreemium
PlatformsWeb, LinuxWeb

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Decodable

  • Managed Flink
  • Change data capture
  • SQL pipelines
  • Custom Flink jobs
  • Credit-based metering
  • Managed connectors

Only in Inngest

Nothing recorded that Decodable does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Decodable

  • Streaming Postgres change data capture into Snowflake or Iceberg without running Debezium and Kafka Connect yourselfnot Inngest
  • Real-time enrichment and filtering of event streams before they reach an expensive warehousenot Inngest
  • A team that already writes Flink jobs but does not want to operate the cluster, checkpoint store or upgradesnot Inngest
  • Replacing a fragile set of cron jobs and Lambda functions that move data between operational systemsnot Inngest

Inngest

  • Handling unpredictable LLM behavior with fine-grained error controlnot Decodable
  • Retrying failed workflow steps independently without restartingnot Decodable
  • Rate limiting per-tenant usage on shared infrastructurenot Decodable
  • Processing thousands of webhooks per event with replay capabilitynot Decodable
  • Persisting state across serverless function invocationsnot Decodable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Decodable

  • Credit pricing rewards intermittent work and penalises always-on pipelines: a single small task running continuously costs roughly 86 US dollars a month before any parallelism.
  • Parallelism multiplies tasks, so scaling a pipeline to keep up with throughput multiplies the bill in a way that is easy to under-forecast at design time.
  • The free tier retains streams for only 24 hours, which is too short to debug an intermittent failure that surfaces days later.
  • Java and Python transformations are gated behind paid plans, so anything the SQL layer cannot express means moving off the free tier immediately.
  • The operational layer is proprietary even though Flink and Debezium are not, so migrating to self-managed Flink later means rebuilding connectors, schema handling and monitoring from scratch.

Inngest

  • Hobby plans pause execution once free quota exhausted; upgrade required to continue
  • Pro plan overages carry tiered metering: additional concurrent steps at $25 per 25, span data at $3/GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, events at $0.50 per 1M

Pricing, plan by plan

Decodable

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Up to four concurrent tasks
    • Small and medium task sizes
    • 24 hour or 10 GB stream retention
  • On Demand$undefined/month
    • 0.12 USD per credit, billed monthly
    • Unlimited concurrent tasks
    • Small, medium and large task sizes
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 0.10 USD per credit on pre-purchased annual capacity
    • Custom task sizes
    • Extensible retention

Inngest

Free
  • HobbyFree
    • 50k executions/month
    • 5 concurrent steps
    • 500 MB span data
  • Pro$99/month starting
    • 1M executions included, pay-as-you-go up to 20M
    • 100+ concurrent steps
    • 5 GB span data ingested
  • Enterprise$null/custom
    • customizable metrics
    • 90-day trace retention
    • SAML, RBAC, audit trails

Which should you pick?

Choose Decodable if

  • You need managed flink.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Linux.
  • You also want change data capture.
Decodable review

Choose Inngest if

  • You want to start without paying.
Inngest review

Questions people ask

Is Decodable or Inngest better?
Neither clearly leads. Decodable starts at Free and Inngest at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Decodable or Inngest?
Decodable starts at Free and Inngest at Free.
Does Decodable or Inngest run on more platforms?
Decodable runs on Web, Linux. Inngest runs on Web.
Can I use Decodable for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Decodable best used for?
Decodable is most often used for streaming postgres change data capture into snowflake or iceberg without running debezium and kafka connect yourself, real-time enrichment and filtering of event streams before they reach an expensive warehouse, a team that already writes flink jobs but does not want to operate the cluster, checkpoint store or upgrades, replacing a fragile set of cron jobs and lambda functions that move data between operational systems. Of those, streaming postgres change data capture into snowflake or iceberg without running debezium and kafka connect yourself and real-time enrichment and filtering of event streams before they reach an expensive warehouse are not what Inngest is typically brought in for.
What can Decodable do that Inngest cannot?
Decodable covers Managed Flink, Change data capture, SQL pipelines, Custom Flink jobs.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Decodable: What is a credit worth?

0.12 US dollars on On Demand and 0.10 on Enterprise. A small task consumes one credit per hour, medium two, large four.

Inngest: How much does Inngest cost?

Inngest offers a free Hobby plan with 50k executions per month and up to 3 users. Pro plans start at $99 per month with 1M executions included and support for up to 15 users. Additional Pro users cost $10 each. Enterprise plans require custom pricing.

Source
Decodable: Is there a free plan?

Yes, up to four concurrent tasks with 24 hour or 10 GB stream retention.

Inngest: Is there a free version of Inngest?

Yes, the Hobby plan is completely free and includes 50k executions per month, 5 concurrent steps, 500 MB span data ingested, 10K scores, 500k events ingested, and support for up to 3 users. Plan changes pause execution once the free quota is exhausted.

Source
Decodable: Is it really Apache Flink underneath?

Yes, Flink for processing and Debezium for change data capture, both managed by Decodable.

Inngest: What are the overage costs on Inngest Pro?

Inngest Pro includes 1M executions with additional executions at $0.50 per 1M up to 20M. Span data overages cost $3 per GB, scores at $1.50 per 1K, and events at $0.50 per 1M. Additional concurrent steps cost $25 per 25 steps beyond the included 100+.

Source
Decodable: Can I run my own Flink jobs?

Yes, Java and Python jobs on paid plans; the free plan is SQL only.

Share

Related pages

More on Decodable

More on Inngest

Keep looking

Other head to heads