Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Survey123 vs Potree

ArcGIS Survey123
Maps
Form-centric field data collection that writes straight into an ArcGIS organisation
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Potree
Maps
Open source WebGL viewer for publishing very large point clouds in a browser
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Potree has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Survey123 the app is free and the licensing is not: every person completing a secure survey needs a paid ArcGIS user type, so a hundred-person field programme costs tens of thousands a year before anyone counts credits.; Potree there is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Survey123 covers XLSForm authoring, Potree covers Octree streaming.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Survey123 and Potree actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Survey123 | Potree |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per year by ArcGIS user type | Open source, no licence fee |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Survey123
- XLSForm authoring
- Web designer
- Offline collection
- Direct ArcGIS write
- Repeats and nested records
- Media and signature capture
- Webhooks and integration
- Reports
Only in Potree
- Octree streaming
- Large dataset rendering
- Measurement tools
- Clipping and profiles
- Annotations
- Attribute colouring
- PotreeDesktop
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Survey123
- A water utility recording hydrant inspections that must appear on the corporate asset map the moment they are submitted, not after a nightly importnot Potree
- A local authority running a public consultation where anyone can submit without a licence, while staff review responses in an ArcGIS dashboardnot Potree
- An environmental monitoring programme with complex conditional forms authored in XLSForm and completed offline in areas with no signalnot Potree
- A field crew already licensed for ArcGIS Field Maps that needs structured forms alongside map-based editing without adding another vendornot Potree
Potree
- A drone survey firm delivering a point cloud to a client who has no desktop software, by publishing a browser viewer link instead of a 40 GB LAZ filenot ArcGIS Survey123
- A heritage or archaeology project publishing a scanned site for public access without paying per-gigabyte hosting to a commercial platformnot ArcGIS Survey123
- An engineering consultancy embedding a point cloud viewer inside its own client portal without licensing a commercial web viewernot ArcGIS Survey123
- A university or research group that needs measurement and profiling in a shareable viewer for a dataset too large to emailnot ArcGIS Survey123
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Survey123
- The app is free and the licensing is not: every person completing a secure survey needs a paid ArcGIS user type, so a hundred-person field programme costs tens of thousands a year before anyone counts credits.
- Esri does not publish user type prices on its main pricing pages, so buyers reconstruct the cost from marketplace listings or a sales conversation, which makes budgeting an ArcGIS rollout unnecessarily opaque.
- Credits are consumed by geocoding, storage and some analysis, and a data collection programme that generates heavy attachment volumes can burn through the bundled allowance and trigger a mid-year top-up.
- It is useless without ArcGIS. There is no standalone deployment, so the decision to use Survey123 is really a decision to buy or keep an ArcGIS estate.
- Form authoring splits between a web designer that is easy but limited and XLSForm plus Survey123 Connect that is capable but requires learning a spreadsheet syntax, and teams routinely start in the wrong one and rebuild.
Potree
- There is no vendor, no support contract and no service level, so anything you build on Potree is your organisation’s responsibility to maintain when a browser update breaks rendering.
- Conversion is a separate manual step with PotreeConverter, and building an automated publishing pipeline around it is engineering work the project does not provide.
- Rendering quality and performance depend on the client machine and WebGL support, so a client on a locked-down corporate laptop with poor graphics may see a viewer that stutters or fails outright.
- A WebGPU rewrite, Potree-Next, is in progress and is not a drop-in upgrade, so current integrations face an eventual migration with no vendor to manage it.
- There is no access control, user management or audit layer; anyone with the URL sees the data unless you build authentication around the static files yourself, which is a real problem for confidential sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Survey123
On request- Survey123 appFree
- No separate charge for the app itself
- Requires an ArcGIS Online or Enterprise organisation
- Public surveys can be completed without a licence
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish surveys
- Foundational user type, can administer the organisation
- Includes an annual credit allowance
- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Required for each person completing a secure survey
- Dependent user type, must be added to an organisation with a foundational licence
- Public marketplace listings have shown around $400 per year
Potree
Free- PotreeFree
- BSD-style open source licence
- Unlimited datasets and viewers
- Self-hosted on any static web server
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Survey123 if
- You need xlsform authoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want web designer.
Choose Potree if
- You need octree streaming.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want large dataset rendering.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Survey123 or Potree better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Survey123 starts at On request and Potree at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Survey123 or Potree?
- Potree has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for ArcGIS Survey123 and Free for Potree.
- Does ArcGIS Survey123 or Potree run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Survey123 runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Potree runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Potree for free?
- Yes. Potree has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Survey123 starts at On request.
- What is ArcGIS Survey123 best used for?
- ArcGIS Survey123 is most often used for a water utility recording hydrant inspections that must appear on the corporate asset map the moment they are submitted, not after a nightly import, a local authority running a public consultation where anyone can submit without a licence, while staff review responses in an arcgis dashboard, an environmental monitoring programme with complex conditional forms authored in xlsform and completed offline in areas with no signal, a field crew already licensed for arcgis field maps that needs structured forms alongside map-based editing without adding another vendor. Of those, a water utility recording hydrant inspections that must appear on the corporate asset map the moment they are submitted, not after a nightly import and a local authority running a public consultation where anyone can submit without a licence, while staff review responses in an arcgis dashboard are not what Potree is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Survey123 do that Potree cannot?
- ArcGIS Survey123 covers XLSForm authoring, Web designer, Offline collection, Direct ArcGIS write. Potree covers Octree streaming, Large dataset rendering, Measurement tools, Clipping and profiles.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Survey123: Is Survey123 free?
The app is. Using it is not, unless your surveys are public. Authoring needs a Creator licence and each person completing a secure survey needs a Mobile Worker, Editor, Creator or GIS Professional user type.
Potree: Does Potree cost anything?
No. It is open source and free. You supply the hosting, which for a static viewer is inexpensive.
ArcGIS Survey123: How much are the user types?
Esri does not list them on its main pricing pages. Public marketplace listings have shown roughly $700 a year for Creator and $400 for Mobile Worker; confirm with Esri or a distributor for your region.
Potree: Is there commercial support?
No. There is no vendor and no support contract. Support is GitHub issues and the community.
ArcGIS Survey123: Can respondents fill in a survey without a licence?
Yes, if the survey is shared publicly. Secure surveys require a licensed user type.
Potree: Who maintains it?
It originated at TU Wien and is maintained principally by Markus Schütz, with community contributions.
ArcGIS Survey123: Does it work offline?
Yes, in the mobile app, with sync when connectivity returns.
Potree: Can it handle very large clouds?
Yes, hundreds of millions of points, because PotreeConverter builds a multi-resolution octree that streams only what is visible.
ArcGIS Survey123: Is it the same as ArcGIS Field Maps?
No. Field Maps is map-centric editing; Survey123 is form-centric. Many organisations license both, which doubles nothing because user types cover the whole app suite.
Potree: Is my data private?
Only if you make it so. Potree serves static files with no built-in authentication, so access control is entirely your responsibility.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Survey123
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Felt
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Leica Infinity
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Transit
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs HERE WeGo
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs IndoorAtlas
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs WhiteboxTools
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Agisoft Metashape
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Lonboard
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs SAGA GIS
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs deck.gl
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Kepler.gl
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Survey123 vs Cesium ion
- Potree vs SW Maps
- Potree vs QGIS
- Potree vs Felt
- Potree vs CARTO
- Potree vs Global Mapper
- Potree vs GRASS GIS
- Potree vs Ride with GPS
- Potree vs onX Maps
- Potree vs Leica Infinity
- Potree vs Transit
- Potree vs AllTrails
- Potree vs Citymapper
- Potree vs Gaia GPS
- Potree vs GraphHopper
- Potree vs HERE WeGo
- Potree vs IndoorAtlas
- Potree vs WhiteboxTools
- Potree vs Agisoft Metashape
- Potree vs Lonboard
- Potree vs SAGA GIS
- Potree vs deck.gl
- Potree vs Kepler.gl
- Potree vs Trailforks
- Potree vs Bing Maps
- Potree vs Cesium ion
