API Management · head to head
Hoppscotch vs Thunder Client

Hoppscotch
API Management
Open-source API development ecosystem with web-based REST client
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
API Management
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hoppscotch hoppscotch's core client is MIT licensed, but hoppscotch.io/pricing (per prior and repeated fetch) renders no server-side pricing content, meaning any hosted Team/Enterprise tier pricing is not readable without a JavaScript-executing browser; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Hoppscotch covers WebSocket, Thunder Client covers Environment variables.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hoppscotch and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hoppscotch | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Self-hosted | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | 2019 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hoppscotch
- WebSocket
- gRPC Client
- Documentation tools
- CI/CD
- Desktop support
- Self-hosted support
Only in Thunder Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
Both cover
- REST Client
- GitHub
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hoppscotch
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Thunder Client
- API Development
- API Gateway
- API Testing
- API Documentation
- Microservices
Both are used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation, microservices, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hoppscotch
- Hoppscotch's core client is MIT licensed, but hoppscotch.io/pricing (per prior and repeated fetch) renders no server-side pricing content, meaning any hosted Team/Enterprise tier pricing is not readable without a JavaScript-executing browser
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Hoppscotch
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full REST client
- WebSocket support
- Community
- Teams$8/monthly
- Team collaboration
- Cloud sync
- Priority support
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Hoppscotch if
- You need websocket.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- You also want grpc client.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need environment variables.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want response testing.
Questions people ask
- Is Hoppscotch or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hoppscotch starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hoppscotch or Thunder Client?
- Hoppscotch starts at Free and Thunder Client at Free.
- Does Hoppscotch or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Hoppscotch runs on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Hoppscotch for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hoppscotch best used for?
- Hoppscotch is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation.
- What can Hoppscotch do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Hoppscotch covers WebSocket, gRPC Client, Documentation tools, CI/CD. Thunder Client covers Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode, Webhook support. Both handle REST Client, GitHub, Web support.
Related pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Hoppscotch vs Appwrite
- Hoppscotch vs Hasura
- Hoppscotch vs PocketBase
- Hoppscotch vs Sanity
- Hoppscotch vs Apigee
- Hoppscotch vs Bruno
- Hoppscotch vs KeystoneJS
- Hoppscotch vs Parse Server
- Hoppscotch vs Stoplight
- Hoppscotch vs Strapi
- Hoppscotch vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hoppscotch vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hoppscotch vs 3scale
- Hoppscotch vs Akana
- Hoppscotch vs Asyncapi
- Hoppscotch vs AWS API Gateway
- Hoppscotch vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hoppscotch vs Backendless
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Apigee
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs Stoplight
- Thunder Client vs Strapi
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs WSO2 API Manager
- Thunder Client vs 3scale
- Thunder Client vs Akana
- Thunder Client vs Asyncapi
- Thunder Client vs AWS API Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Thunder Client vs Backendless
