Softwr

ERP · head to head

Icertis vs Ivalua

Icertis logo

Icertis

ERP

Enterprise contract lifecycle management built on Microsoft Azure

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Ivalua logo

Ivalua

ERP

Source-to-pay on one codebase and one data model, sold to large enterprises by module

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Icertis the value comes from structured clause and metadata models, and building those is legal and commercial work your own people must do, so a project resourced as an IT deployment stalls at the point where somebody has to decide what the standard clauses actually are.; Ivalua entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
  • They diverge on capability: Icertis covers Clause library and templates, Ivalua covers Single data model.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Icertis and Ivalua actually diverge.

Attributes where Icertis and Ivalua differ
AttributeIcertisIvalua
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (ERP).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Icertis

  • Clause library and templates
  • Negotiation and redlining
  • Approval workflow
  • Obligation management
  • Contract repository
  • Microsoft integration
  • ERP and CRM connectors
  • Reporting and risk analysis

Only in Ivalua

  • Single data model
  • Supplier risk and onboarding
  • Contract lifecycle management
  • Direct materials procurement
  • Invoice matching and payment
  • Configurable workflow engine

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Icertis

  • An enterprise that cannot answer which of its live contracts contain a given liability or indemnity clause without a manual reviewnot Ivalua
  • A business losing revenue to unclaimed rebates, missed price escalations or auto renewals nobody trackednot Ivalua
  • A regulated organisation that must demonstrate to an auditor that specific terms are present across a contract populationnot Ivalua
  • A sales organisation where legal review is the longest step in the deal cycle and standard agreements are being reviewed as though they were bespokenot Ivalua

Ivalua

  • A manufacturer that needs direct materials sourcing tied to a bill of materials, not just indirect spendnot Icertis
  • An enterprise whose last procurement programme failed because supplier master data could not be reconciled across modulesnot Icertis
  • A regulated organisation needing third-party risk screening enforced before a supplier can receive a purchase ordernot Icertis
  • Replacing separate sourcing, contract and invoice systems where each holds a different version of the supplier recordnot Icertis

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Icertis

  • The value comes from structured clause and metadata models, and building those is legal and commercial work your own people must do, so a project resourced as an IT deployment stalls at the point where somebody has to decide what the standard clauses actually are.
  • This is priced and scoped for large enterprises, so an organisation with a few thousand straightforward agreements pays for capability it will not configure and would reach most of the same benefit with a lighter mid-market product.
  • Implementations run in quarters rather than weeks once integrations to CRM and ERP are in scope, and the business case usually assumes benefits that only start after the historic contract population has been migrated and tagged.
  • Migrating legacy contracts means extracting terms from signed PDFs, and automated extraction needs human review to be trustworthy, so the backlog of old agreements is a labour cost that is routinely left out of the initial estimate.
  • The platform is built on Azure with its strongest integrations in the Microsoft stack, which is an advantage inside a Microsoft estate and a source of friction for an organisation standardised elsewhere.

Ivalua

  • Entry deployments are reported around 150,000 US dollars a year before implementation, which puts it entirely out of reach for mid-market procurement teams.
  • Configurability requires an internal product owner and usually a systems integrator, so the total programme cost is a multiple of the licence and the failure modes are those of an ERP project.
  • Module-based licensing means capability you assumed was included, such as contract lifecycle management or supplier risk, is frequently a separate line item discovered late in the negotiation.
  • Supplier network pricing scales with active supplier count, so an organisation with a long tail of small suppliers pays for records that generate little spend.
  • The user interface prioritises configurability over ease, and casual requisitioners across the business need more guidance than a consumer-style intake tool would require.

Pricing, plan by plan

Icertis

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Icertis review.

Ivalua

On request
  • Ivalua Source-to-Pay$undefined/year
    • Module-based licensing rather than per seat
    • User counts tiered by role category
    • Supplier network pricing driven by active supplier count

Which should you pick?

Choose Icertis if

  • You need clause library and templates.
  • You also want negotiation and redlining.
Icertis review

Choose Ivalua if

  • You need single data model.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want supplier risk and onboarding.
Ivalua review

Questions people ask

Is Icertis or Ivalua better?
Neither clearly leads. Icertis starts at On request and Ivalua at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Icertis or Ivalua?
Icertis starts at On request and Ivalua at On request.
Does Icertis or Ivalua run on more platforms?
Icertis runs on Web. Ivalua runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Icertis best used for?
Icertis is most often used for an enterprise that cannot answer which of its live contracts contain a given liability or indemnity clause without a manual review, a business losing revenue to unclaimed rebates, missed price escalations or auto renewals nobody tracked, a regulated organisation that must demonstrate to an auditor that specific terms are present across a contract population, a sales organisation where legal review is the longest step in the deal cycle and standard agreements are being reviewed as though they were bespoke. Of those, an enterprise that cannot answer which of its live contracts contain a given liability or indemnity clause without a manual review and a business losing revenue to unclaimed rebates, missed price escalations or auto renewals nobody tracked are not what Ivalua is typically brought in for.
What can Icertis do that Ivalua cannot?
Icertis covers Clause library and templates, Negotiation and redlining, Approval workflow, Obligation management. Ivalua covers Single data model, Supplier risk and onboarding, Contract lifecycle management, Direct materials procurement.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Icertis: How is this different from storing contracts in SharePoint?

A document store answers where the contract is. CLM answers what is in it. If your questions are about locating files, a document store is enough. If your questions are portfolio wide, such as total exposure to a clause type or which agreements renew next quarter, you need the terms as data.

Ivalua: What does the single codebase actually buy me?

One supplier and contract record used across every module, so there is no synchronisation layer to reconcile and no data drift between sourcing and invoicing.

Icertis: Do we need a legal operations team to make this work?

In practice yes, or someone doing that job under another title. The system enforces decisions about standard language, approval thresholds and acceptable deviation, and if nobody owns those decisions the workflow becomes an approval queue with no rules behind it.

Ivalua: What does Ivalua cost?

It is not published. Third parties report entry deployments around 150,000 USD a year and full-platform deployments above 400,000, plus implementation.

Icertis: What does it compete with?

SAP Ariba contract management, Coupa, Conga, DocuSign CLM, Sirion and Agiloft, among others. The split is roughly enterprise depth against mid-market speed, and Icertis sits firmly at the enterprise end.

Ivalua: Does it handle direct materials?

Yes, which distinguishes it from suites built primarily for indirect spend.

Icertis: Is contract data extraction from legacy agreements automated?

Partly. Extraction tooling gets you a draft set of fields, but anything you intend to rely on for a legal or financial decision needs human verification, so budget for review effort proportional to the size of your back catalogue.

Ivalua: Is Ivalua still independent?

Yes. It is one of the few large source-to-pay vendors not owned by a bigger enterprise software group.

Share

Related pages

More on Icertis

More on Ivalua

Keep looking

Other head to heads