Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Omada Identity

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Omada Identity
Cybersecurity
Identity governance and administration focused on access certification and compliance evidence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Omada Identity pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Omada Identity covers Access certification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Omada Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Omada Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Omada Identity
- Access certification
- Joiner mover leaver
- Role modelling
- Segregation of duties
- Access request
- Connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Omada Identity
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Omada Identity
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Omada Identity
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Omada Identity
Omada Identity
- An organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidencednot IBM QRadar
- A company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last daynot IBM QRadar
- A regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and ERP entitlementsnot IBM QRadar
- A business that abandoned a previous multi-year IGA implementation and needs something that reaches production this yearnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Omada Identity
- Pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- It governs access but provides no single sign-on, multi-factor authentication or privileged session management, so it is always a second or third identity subscription rather than a consolidation.
- The fast-deployment promise depends on accepting its standard process model; organisations with genuinely unusual entitlement structures end up in custom work and the timeline advantage disappears.
- Connector coverage is strong for mainstream enterprise systems and thin for bespoke or industry-specific applications, and each custom connector is a project with ongoing maintenance.
- Data quality in the HR system determines whether joiner mover leaver automation works, so companies with messy HR records find the tool exposes that problem rather than solving it.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Omada Identity
On request- Omada Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per managed identity per year
- SaaS on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options
- Implementation delivered on a defined methodology, quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Omada Identity if
- You need access certification.
- You also want joiner mover leaver.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Omada Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Omada Identity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Omada Identity?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Omada Identity at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Omada Identity run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Omada Identity runs on Web.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Omada Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Omada Identity cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Omada Identity covers Access certification, Joiner mover leaver, Role modelling, Segregation of duties.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Omada Identity: Does it provide single sign-on?
No. Omada is governance only. You still need Entra ID, Okta or equivalent for authentication.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Omada Identity: How is it licensed?
Per managed identity per year. Count contractors and service accounts before you compare quotes, because they usually count.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Omada Identity: How long does deployment take?
Months rather than years is the positioning, and it is achievable if you accept the standard process model. Heavy customisation returns you to traditional IGA timelines.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Omada Identity
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Netwrix
- IBM QRadar vs Saviynt
- IBM QRadar vs One Identity
- IBM QRadar vs Doppler
- IBM QRadar vs Speakeasy
- IBM QRadar vs Nessus
- IBM QRadar vs Chainguard
- IBM QRadar vs Fenergo
- IBM QRadar vs KnowBe4
- IBM QRadar vs Mimecast
- IBM QRadar vs ThetaRay
- IBM QRadar vs Trivy
- IBM QRadar vs Trulioo
- IBM QRadar vs Unit21
- IBM QRadar vs Veracode
- IBM QRadar vs Very Good Security
- IBM QRadar vs Tenable
- Omada Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Omada Identity vs 1Password
- Omada Identity vs Norton 360
- Omada Identity vs LastPass
- Omada Identity vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Omada Identity vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Omada Identity vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Omada Identity vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Omada Identity vs Recorded Future
- Omada Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Omada Identity vs Proofpoint
- Omada Identity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Omada Identity vs Arnica
- Omada Identity vs Authelia
- Omada Identity vs Authy
- Omada Identity vs Baffle
- Omada Identity vs Beyond Identity
- Omada Identity vs BeyondTrust
- Omada Identity vs Netwrix
- Omada Identity vs Saviynt
- Omada Identity vs One Identity
- Omada Identity vs Doppler
- Omada Identity vs Speakeasy
- Omada Identity vs Nessus
- Omada Identity vs Chainguard
- Omada Identity vs Fenergo
- Omada Identity vs KnowBe4
- Omada Identity vs Mimecast
- Omada Identity vs ThetaRay
- Omada Identity vs Trivy
- Omada Identity vs Trulioo
- Omada Identity vs Unit21
- Omada Identity vs Veracode
- Omada Identity vs Very Good Security
- Omada Identity vs Tenable
