Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Mimecast

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Mimecast no pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Mimecast actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $4/month |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Email, Cloud, Collaboration |
| Founded | 1911 | 2003 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Mimecast
- Advanced threat detection
- Secure sharing
- Email encryption
- Message tracking
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- eDiscovery
- Backup and recovery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Mimecast
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Mimecast
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Mimecast
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Mimecast
Mimecast
- Email security filtering against phishing and targeted attacksnot IBM QRadar
- Email archiving, continuity and compliance for organisationsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Mimecast
- No pricing is published for any product or plan, and every route ends at a quote or demo request
- The platform is split into separately sold products for email security, awareness training, data protection and governance
- Collaboration threat protection, DMARC analysis, incident response and email archiving are all further add ons on top of those
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Mimecast
$4/month- Defender$4/month
- Per user
- Threat protection
- Impersonation prevention
- Archive$3/month
- Email archiving
- Legal hold
- Search & recall
- Unified$6/month
- All Defender features
- All Archive features
- Backup
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Mimecast if
- You need advanced threat detection.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- You also want secure sharing.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Mimecast better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Mimecast?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Mimecast at $4/month.
- Does IBM QRadar or Mimecast run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Mimecast runs on Email, Cloud, Collaboration.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Mimecast is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Mimecast cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Mimecast covers Advanced threat detection, Secure sharing, Email encryption, Message tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Mimecast: How much does Mimecast cost?
Mimecast does not publish pricing on its website. Customers must request a custom quote by contacting the sales team at +1 617 393 7000 or using the Get a Quote button.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Mimecast: Is there a free trial of Mimecast?
Mimecast's trial and pricing options are not specified on the public website. Contact sales at +1 617 393 7000 or through their support portal at mimecastsupport.zendesk.com for trial availability.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Nessus
- IBM QRadar vs Qualys VMDR
- IBM QRadar vs Doppler
- IBM QRadar vs Chainguard
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Netwrix
- IBM QRadar vs Transmit Security
- IBM QRadar vs TrustArc
- IBM QRadar vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- IBM QRadar vs VMware Carbon Black
- IBM QRadar vs Wireshark
- IBM QRadar vs WorkOS
- Mimecast vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mimecast vs 1Password
- Mimecast vs Norton 360
- Mimecast vs LastPass
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Mimecast vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Mimecast vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Mimecast vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Mimecast vs Recorded Future
- Mimecast vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Mimecast vs Proofpoint
- Mimecast vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Mimecast vs Arnica
- Mimecast vs Authelia
- Mimecast vs Authy
- Mimecast vs Baffle
- Mimecast vs Beyond Identity
- Mimecast vs BeyondTrust
- Mimecast vs Nessus
- Mimecast vs Qualys VMDR
- Mimecast vs Doppler
- Mimecast vs Chainguard
- Mimecast vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Mimecast vs Netwrix
- Mimecast vs Transmit Security
- Mimecast vs TrustArc
- Mimecast vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Mimecast vs VMware Carbon Black
- Mimecast vs Wireshark
- Mimecast vs WorkOS

