Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Veracode

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Veracode
Cybersecurity
Application risk management platform for finding and fixing software vulnerabilities.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Veracode no public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Veracode actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Veracode |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Veracode
- Static analysis (SAST)
- Dynamic analysis (DAST)
- Software composition analysis
- AI-driven code remediation
- Container security
- Risk Manager (ASPM)
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Veracode
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Veracode
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Veracode
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Veracode
Veracode
- Scanning applications for vulnerabilities across the SDLCnot IBM QRadar
- Automating remediation of flagged security flaws with AInot IBM QRadar
- Securing containerized workloads before deploymentnot IBM QRadar
- Running penetration tests as a managed servicenot IBM QRadar
- Enforcing security policy governance across many applicationsnot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Veracode
- No public pricing; customers must request a demo and custom quote.
- Full platform capability spans many modules, which can require significant onboarding.
- Package Firewall and PTaaS are separate add-ons rather than included by default.
- Primarily built for enterprise scale, less suited to small individual projects.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Veracode
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Veracode review.
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Veracode if
- You need static analysis (sast).
- You work on web, api.
- You also want dynamic analysis (dast).
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Veracode better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Veracode at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Veracode?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Veracode at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Veracode run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Veracode runs on web, api.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Veracode is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Veracode cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Veracode covers Static analysis (SAST), Dynamic analysis (DAST), Software composition analysis, AI-driven code remediation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Veracode: How does Veracode pricing work?
Veracode does not publish pricing on their website. Organizations must request a personalized demo or contact sales to receive quotes tailored to their specific needs and usage volume.
SourceIBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Veracode: Does Veracode offer a free trial or free version?
No information about free trials or free versions is provided on Veracode's public website. Organizations must contact sales to discuss trial options.
SourceIBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Semgrep
- IBM QRadar vs Legit Security
- IBM QRadar vs Aikido
- IBM QRadar vs Snyk
- IBM QRadar vs Endor Labs
- IBM QRadar vs Tenable
- IBM QRadar vs Acunetix
- IBM QRadar vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- IBM QRadar vs Tanium
- IBM QRadar vs Trivy
- IBM QRadar vs Grype
- IBM QRadar vs Quantexa
- IBM QRadar vs Termly
- IBM QRadar vs Transcend
- IBM QRadar vs WireGuard
- IBM QRadar vs Akeyless
- IBM QRadar vs DataGrail
- Veracode vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Veracode vs 1Password
- Veracode vs Norton 360
- Veracode vs LastPass
- Veracode vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Veracode vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Veracode vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Veracode vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Veracode vs Recorded Future
- Veracode vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Veracode vs Proofpoint
- Veracode vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Veracode vs Arnica
- Veracode vs Authelia
- Veracode vs Authy
- Veracode vs Baffle
- Veracode vs Beyond Identity
- Veracode vs BeyondTrust
- Veracode vs Semgrep
- Veracode vs Legit Security
- Veracode vs Aikido
- Veracode vs Snyk
- Veracode vs Endor Labs
- Veracode vs Tenable
- Veracode vs Acunetix
- Veracode vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Veracode vs Tanium
- Veracode vs Trivy
- Veracode vs Grype
- Veracode vs Quantexa
- Veracode vs Termly
- Veracode vs Transcend
- Veracode vs WireGuard
- Veracode vs Akeyless
- Veracode vs DataGrail
