Cybersecurity · head to head
Omada Identity vs Proofpoint

Omada Identity
Cybersecurity
Identity governance and administration focused on access certification and compliance evidence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Omada Identity pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.; Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- They diverge on capability: Omada Identity covers Access certification, Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Omada Identity and Proofpoint actually diverge.
| Attribute | Omada Identity | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $6/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web | Email, Cloud, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2002 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Omada Identity
- Access certification
- Joiner mover leaver
- Role modelling
- Segregation of duties
- Access request
- Connectors
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Omada Identity
- An organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidencednot Proofpoint
- A company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last daynot Proofpoint
- A regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and ERP entitlementsnot Proofpoint
- A business that abandoned a previous multi-year IGA implementation and needs something that reaches production this yearnot Proofpoint
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Omada Identity
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Omada Identity
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Omada Identity
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Omada Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Omada Identity
- Pricing is per managed identity, so organisations with large numbers of contractors, service accounts or seasonal staff pay governance fees on identities nobody is really governing.
- It governs access but provides no single sign-on, multi-factor authentication or privileged session management, so it is always a second or third identity subscription rather than a consolidation.
- The fast-deployment promise depends on accepting its standard process model; organisations with genuinely unusual entitlement structures end up in custom work and the timeline advantage disappears.
- Connector coverage is strong for mainstream enterprise systems and thin for bespoke or industry-specific applications, and each custom connector is a project with ongoing maintenance.
- Data quality in the HR system determines whether joiner mover leaver automation works, so companies with messy HR records find the tool exposes that problem rather than solving it.
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Pricing, plan by plan
Omada Identity
On request- Omada Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per managed identity per year
- SaaS on Microsoft Azure with regional deployment options
- Implementation delivered on a defined methodology, quoted separately
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Omada Identity if
- You need access certification.
- You also want joiner mover leaver.
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Questions people ask
- Is Omada Identity or Proofpoint better?
- Neither clearly leads. Omada Identity starts at On request and Proofpoint at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Omada Identity or Proofpoint?
- Omada Identity starts at On request and Proofpoint at $6/month.
- Does Omada Identity or Proofpoint run on more platforms?
- Omada Identity runs on Web. Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web.
- What is Omada Identity best used for?
- Omada Identity is most often used for an organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidenced, a company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last day, a regulated firm needing documented segregation of duties across finance and erp entitlements, a business that abandoned a previous multi-year iga implementation and needs something that reaches production this year. Of those, an organisation whose auditors flagged that access recertification is run on spreadsheets and cannot be evidenced and a company with high staff turnover where leavers keep access to systems weeks after their last day are not what Proofpoint is typically brought in for.
- What can Omada Identity do that Proofpoint cannot?
- Omada Identity covers Access certification, Joiner mover leaver, Role modelling, Segregation of duties. Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Omada Identity: Does it provide single sign-on?
No. Omada is governance only. You still need Entra ID, Okta or equivalent for authentication.
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Omada Identity: How is it licensed?
Per managed identity per year. Count contractors and service accounts before you compare quotes, because they usually count.
Proofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Omada Identity: How long does deployment take?
Months rather than years is the positioning, and it is achievable if you accept the standard process model. Heavy customisation returns you to traditional IGA timelines.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
More on Omada Identity
Other head to heads
- Omada Identity vs Netwrix
- Omada Identity vs Saviynt
- Omada Identity vs One Identity
- Omada Identity vs Doppler
- Omada Identity vs Speakeasy
- Omada Identity vs Nessus
- Omada Identity vs Chainguard
- Omada Identity vs Fenergo
- Omada Identity vs Arnica
- Omada Identity vs KnowBe4
- Omada Identity vs Mimecast
- Omada Identity vs ThetaRay
- Omada Identity vs Trivy
- Omada Identity vs Trulioo
- Omada Identity vs Unit21
- Omada Identity vs Veracode
- Omada Identity vs Very Good Security
- Omada Identity vs Tenable
- Omada Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Omada Identity vs Norton 360
- Omada Identity vs 1Password
- Omada Identity vs LastPass
- Omada Identity vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Omada Identity vs Qualys VMDR
- Omada Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Omada Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Omada Identity vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Omada Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Omada Identity vs Sysdig
- Omada Identity vs Dahua Technology
- Omada Identity vs Descope
- Omada Identity vs Drata
- Omada Identity vs DTiQ
- Omada Identity vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Omada Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Netwrix
- Proofpoint vs Saviynt
- Proofpoint vs One Identity
- Proofpoint vs Doppler
- Proofpoint vs Speakeasy
- Proofpoint vs Nessus
- Proofpoint vs Chainguard
- Proofpoint vs Fenergo
- Proofpoint vs Arnica
- Proofpoint vs KnowBe4
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs ThetaRay
- Proofpoint vs Trivy
- Proofpoint vs Trulioo
- Proofpoint vs Unit21
- Proofpoint vs Veracode
- Proofpoint vs Very Good Security
- Proofpoint vs Tenable
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN
