APIs · head to head
Hasura vs NATS

Hasura
APIs
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NATS
Databases
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hasura active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly; NATS core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, NATS covers Very low latency.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hasura and NATS actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- Webhooks
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
Only in NATS
- Very low latency
- JetStream
- Single binary
- Request-reply
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot NATS
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot NATS
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot NATS
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot NATS
NATS
- Service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraintnot Hasura
- Edge and IoT messaging where a lightweight broker mattersnot Hasura
- Replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guaranteesnot Hasura
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hasura
- Active model definition: model/command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly
- Private DDN requires Base or Advanced plan
NATS
- Core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- JetStream adds the durability but also the operational complexity NATS is chosen to avoid
- A much smaller ecosystem than Kafka or RabbitMQ, with fewer connectors and integrations
- Fewer people know it, so hiring and existing organisational knowledge favour the alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Hasura
Free- DDN FreeFree
- Unlimited models
- 1 supergraph developer
- 15-minute observability retention
- DDN Base$5/month
- Per active model billing
- Unlimited developers
- 30-day observability retention
- DDN Advanced$30/month
- Per active model billing
- Federated collaboration
- Multi-repo CI/CD
NATS
Free- NATSFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose NATS if
- You need very low latency.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want jetstream.
Questions people ask
- Is Hasura or NATS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and NATS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hasura or NATS?
- Hasura starts at Free and NATS at Free.
- Does Hasura or NATS run on more platforms?
- Hasura runs on Web. NATS runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Hasura for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hasura best used for?
- Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what NATS is typically brought in for.
- What can Hasura do that NATS cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Real-time subscriptions, Access control, PostgreSQL. NATS covers Very low latency, JetStream, Single binary, Request-reply.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hasura: How much does Hasura cost?
Hasura DDN Free is free. DDN Base starts at $5/active model/month, and DDN Advanced starts at $30/active model/month.
SourceNATS: Is NATS free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Synadia sells a managed service.
Hasura: What is an active model in Hasura pricing?
An active model is defined as any model or command accessed more than 1,000 times monthly.
SourceNATS: Does NATS persist messages?
Core NATS does not — it is fire-and-forget. JetStream adds persistence, streaming and replay when you need them.
Hasura: Is there a free version of Hasura?
Yes, Hasura DDN Free is always free and includes unlimited models, 1 supergraph developer, and 15-minute observability retention.
SourceNATS: NATS or Kafka?
NATS is far lighter and lower latency, and much simpler to run. Kafka is the answer when you need a durable replayable log and a large connector ecosystem.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hasura vs PocketBase
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs GraphQL Apollo
- Hasura vs GraphQL Playground
- Hasura vs Directus
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs Janus Gateway
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Gravitee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Lithic
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Swan
- Hasura vs Temenos Transact
- Hasura vs Token.io
- Hasura vs Treasury Prime
- Hasura vs Apache Pulsar
- Hasura vs RabbitMQ
- Hasura vs VerneMQ
- Hasura vs EMQX
- Hasura vs Redpanda
- Hasura vs Timeplus
- Hasura vs Solace PubSub+
- Hasura vs YugabyteDB
- Hasura vs Cockroach Labs
- Hasura vs SurrealDB
- Hasura vs Teradata
- Hasura vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Hasura vs turbopuffer
- Hasura vs Apache Kafka
- Hasura vs Apache Flink
- Hasura vs Apache Druid
- NATS vs PocketBase
- NATS vs Parse Server
- NATS vs Appwrite
- NATS vs GraphQL Apollo
- NATS vs GraphQL Playground
- NATS vs Directus
- NATS vs Asyncapi
- NATS vs Janus Gateway
- NATS vs Strapi
- NATS vs Gravitee
- NATS vs Bruno
- NATS vs KeystoneJS
- NATS vs Lithic
- NATS vs Stoplight
- NATS vs Swan
- NATS vs Temenos Transact
- NATS vs Token.io
- NATS vs Treasury Prime
- NATS vs Apache Pulsar
- NATS vs RabbitMQ
- NATS vs VerneMQ
- NATS vs EMQX
- NATS vs Redpanda
- NATS vs Timeplus
- NATS vs Solace PubSub+
- NATS vs YugabyteDB
- NATS vs Cockroach Labs
- NATS vs SurrealDB
- NATS vs Teradata
- NATS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- NATS vs turbopuffer
- NATS vs Apache Kafka
- NATS vs Apache Flink
- NATS vs Apache Druid
