API Management · head to head
Hasura vs PocketBase

Hasura
API Management
GraphQL engine that instantly creates production-ready GraphQL API from databases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

PocketBase
API Management
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hasura database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only; PocketBase not recommended for production critical applications until reaching v1.0.0
- They diverge on capability: Hasura covers GraphQL API, PocketBase covers REST API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hasura and PocketBase actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hasura | PocketBase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hasura
- GraphQL API
- Access control
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- REST APIs
- Cloud support
- Kubernetes support
Only in PocketBase
- REST API
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- File storage
- Go support
Both cover
- Real-time subscriptions
- Webhooks
- Self-hosted support
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hasura
- Automatic GraphQL API generation from existing databasesnot PocketBase
- Real-time data subscriptions for modern applicationsnot PocketBase
- Backend infrastructure for web and mobile applicationsnot PocketBase
- Event-triggered webhooks for database changesnot PocketBase
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Hasura
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Hasura
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Hasura
- File storage and media attachment managementnot Hasura
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Hasura
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Hasura
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hasura
- Database support limited to PostgreSQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse, and MS SQL Server only
PocketBase
- Not recommended for production critical applications until reaching v1.0.0
- Full backward compatibility not guaranteed before v1.0.0 (breaking changes possible with version updates)
- Pull requests for new features are disabled due to spam concerns (feature contributions limited)
Pricing, plan by plan
Hasura
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Hasura review.
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Hasura if
- You need graphql api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want access control.
Choose PocketBase if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want admin ui.
Questions people ask
- Is Hasura or PocketBase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hasura starts at Free and PocketBase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hasura or PocketBase?
- Hasura starts at Free and PocketBase at Free.
- Does Hasura or PocketBase run on more platforms?
- Hasura runs on Web. PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Hasura for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hasura best used for?
- Hasura is most often used for automatic graphql api generation from existing databases, real-time data subscriptions for modern applications, backend infrastructure for web and mobile applications, event-triggered webhooks for database changes. Of those, automatic graphql api generation from existing databases and real-time data subscriptions for modern applications are not what PocketBase is typically brought in for.
- What can Hasura do that PocketBase cannot?
- Hasura covers GraphQL API, Access control, PostgreSQL, MySQL. PocketBase covers REST API, Admin UI, SQLite, File storage. Both handle Real-time subscriptions, Webhooks, Self-hosted support, Docker support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hasura vs Appwrite
- Hasura vs Sanity
- Hasura vs Apigee
- Hasura vs Bruno
- Hasura vs KeystoneJS
- Hasura vs Parse Server
- Hasura vs Stoplight
- Hasura vs Strapi
- Hasura vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hasura vs Thunder Client
- Hasura vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hasura vs 3scale
- Hasura vs Akana
- Hasura vs Asyncapi
- Hasura vs AWS API Gateway
- Hasura vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Hasura vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Appwrite
- PocketBase vs Sanity
- PocketBase vs Apigee
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Parse Server
- PocketBase vs Stoplight
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs WSO2 API Manager
- PocketBase vs 3scale
- PocketBase vs Akana
- PocketBase vs Asyncapi
- PocketBase vs AWS API Gateway
- PocketBase vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- PocketBase vs Backendless
