APIs · head to head
Janus Gateway vs NATS

Janus Gateway
APIs
WebRTC gateway and media server for real-time communication
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

NATS
Databases
High-performance messaging system for cloud-native applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Janus Gateway no commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings; NATS core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- They diverge on capability: Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, NATS covers Very low latency.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Janus Gateway and NATS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Janus Gateway | NATS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Linux, MacOS, BSD | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
| Category | APIs | Databases |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Janus Gateway
- WebRTC Gateway
- Media Routing
- Video Conferencing
- RTP
- SRTP
- REST API
- Linux support
- MacOS support
Only in NATS
- Very low latency
- JetStream
- Single binary
- Request-reply
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Janus Gateway
- API Developmentnot NATS
- API Gatewaynot NATS
- API Testingnot NATS
- API Documentationnot NATS
- Microservicesnot NATS
NATS
- Service-to-service messaging where latency is the binding constraintnot Janus Gateway
- Edge and IoT messaging where a lightweight broker mattersnot Janus Gateway
- Replacing a heavier broker when the workload does not need its guaranteesnot Janus Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Janus Gateway
- No commercial pricing published; open-source project without official commercial offerings
- Community-supported only; no vendor commercial support or SLA available
NATS
- Core NATS has no persistence at all, so messages are lost if no subscriber is listening
- JetStream adds the durability but also the operational complexity NATS is chosen to avoid
- A much smaller ecosystem than Kafka or RabbitMQ, with fewer connectors and integrations
- Fewer people know it, so hiring and existing organisational knowledge favour the alternatives
Pricing, plan by plan
Janus Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core WebRTC gateway
- Community support
NATS
Free- NATSFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Janus Gateway if
- You need webrtc gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, MacOS, BSD.
- You also want media routing.
Choose NATS if
- You need very low latency.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want jetstream.
Questions people ask
- Is Janus Gateway or NATS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Janus Gateway starts at Free and NATS at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Janus Gateway or NATS?
- Janus Gateway starts at Free and NATS at Free.
- Does Janus Gateway or NATS run on more platforms?
- Janus Gateway runs on Linux, MacOS, BSD. NATS runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Janus Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Janus Gateway best used for?
- Janus Gateway is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what NATS is typically brought in for.
- What can Janus Gateway do that NATS cannot?
- Janus Gateway covers WebRTC Gateway, Media Routing, Video Conferencing, RTP. NATS covers Very low latency, JetStream, Single binary, Request-reply.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Janus Gateway: How much does Janus Gateway cost?
Janus Gateway has no pricing model; it is a free open-source WebRTC server developed by Meetecho. The general-purpose server is available for download at no cost. There are no subscription tiers or commercial licensing fees.
SourceNATS: Is NATS free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Synadia sells a managed service.
Janus Gateway: Is Janus Gateway supported commercially?
Janus Gateway is community-supported open-source software with no official commercial support or SLA from the vendors. While Meetecho developed the project, users must rely on community documentation and forums for assistance.
SourceNATS: Does NATS persist messages?
Core NATS does not — it is fire-and-forget. JetStream adds persistence, streaming and replay when you need them.
NATS: NATS or Kafka?
NATS is far lighter and lower latency, and much simpler to run. Kafka is the answer when you need a durable replayable log and a large connector ecosystem.
Related pages
More on Janus Gateway
Other head to heads
- Janus Gateway vs Hasura
- Janus Gateway vs PocketBase
- Janus Gateway vs Appwrite
- Janus Gateway vs Sanity
- Janus Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Convoy
- Janus Gateway vs Tyk
- Janus Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Janus Gateway vs Gravitee
- Janus Gateway vs Asyncapi
- Janus Gateway vs Parse Server
- Janus Gateway vs Fintech Farm
- Janus Gateway vs Fintecture
- Janus Gateway vs Formance
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Janus Gateway vs GraphQL Playground
- Janus Gateway vs Kong
- Janus Gateway vs Apache Pulsar
- Janus Gateway vs RabbitMQ
- Janus Gateway vs VerneMQ
- Janus Gateway vs EMQX
- Janus Gateway vs Redpanda
- Janus Gateway vs Timeplus
- Janus Gateway vs Solace PubSub+
- Janus Gateway vs YugabyteDB
- Janus Gateway vs Cockroach Labs
- Janus Gateway vs SurrealDB
- Janus Gateway vs Teradata
- Janus Gateway vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Janus Gateway vs turbopuffer
- Janus Gateway vs Apache Kafka
- Janus Gateway vs Apache Flink
- Janus Gateway vs Apache Druid
- NATS vs Hasura
- NATS vs PocketBase
- NATS vs Appwrite
- NATS vs Sanity
- NATS vs Kong Gateway
- NATS vs Convoy
- NATS vs Tyk
- NATS vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- NATS vs Gravitee
- NATS vs Asyncapi
- NATS vs Parse Server
- NATS vs Fintech Farm
- NATS vs Fintecture
- NATS vs Formance
- NATS vs GraphQL Apollo
- NATS vs GraphQL Playground
- NATS vs Kong
- NATS vs Apache Pulsar
- NATS vs RabbitMQ
- NATS vs VerneMQ
- NATS vs EMQX
- NATS vs Redpanda
- NATS vs Timeplus
- NATS vs Solace PubSub+
- NATS vs YugabyteDB
- NATS vs Cockroach Labs
- NATS vs SurrealDB
- NATS vs Teradata
- NATS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- NATS vs turbopuffer
- NATS vs Apache Kafka
- NATS vs Apache Flink
- NATS vs Apache Druid
