Cloud · head to head
HAProxy vs Kong
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HAProxy configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: HAProxy covers High throughput, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HAProxy and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HAProxy
- High throughput
- Layer 4 and 7
- Health checking
- Rate limiting and ACLs
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HAProxy
- Load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware billnot Kong
- Precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rulesnot Kong
- TCP load balancing for databases and non-HTTP servicesnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot HAProxy
- API development and testingnot HAProxy
- Enterprise API security and governancenot HAProxy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HAProxy
- Configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- No automatic certificate management, unlike newer servers that treat it as default behaviour
- The built-in stats page is basic, so real observability needs exporters and dashboards
- A dedicated load balancer is more machinery than small deployments need
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
HAProxy
Free- HAProxyFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose HAProxy if
- You need high throughput.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want layer 4 and 7.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is HAProxy or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. HAProxy starts at Free and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HAProxy or Kong?
- HAProxy starts at Free and Kong at Free.
- Does HAProxy or Kong run on more platforms?
- HAProxy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use HAProxy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is HAProxy best used for?
- HAProxy is most often used for load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware bill, precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rules, tcp load balancing for databases and non-http services. Of those, load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware bill and precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rules are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can HAProxy do that Kong cannot?
- HAProxy covers High throughput, Layer 4 and 7, Health checking, Rate limiting and ACLs. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HAProxy: Is HAProxy free?
Yes, the community version is open source. HAProxy Technologies sells HAProxy Enterprise separately.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceHAProxy: HAProxy or Nginx?
HAProxy is a specialist load balancer with deeper balancing and health-check features. Nginx also serves static content and is more approachable, which is why it is more common as a general web server.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceHAProxy: Does HAProxy handle TLS certificates automatically?
No. Certificate issuance and renewal are external, unlike Caddy where it is automatic.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- HAProxy vs Caddy
- HAProxy vs Fastly
- HAProxy vs Jaeger
- HAProxy vs Vultr
- HAProxy vs Contabo
- HAProxy vs Koyeb
- HAProxy vs Fireworks AI
- HAProxy vs Go
- HAProxy vs Proxmox VE
- HAProxy vs VictoriaMetrics
- HAProxy vs Northflank
- HAProxy vs Oracle Cloud
- HAProxy vs Orca Security
- HAProxy vs Cilium
- HAProxy vs Thanos
- HAProxy vs Longhorn
- HAProxy vs minikube
- HAProxy vs OpenTelemetry
- HAProxy vs Convoy
- HAProxy vs PocketBase
- HAProxy vs Appwrite
- HAProxy vs Hasura
- HAProxy vs Sanity
- HAProxy vs Tyk
- HAProxy vs WSO2 API Manager
- HAProxy vs Gravitee
- HAProxy vs Janus Gateway
- HAProxy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- HAProxy vs 3scale
- HAProxy vs Akana
- HAProxy vs Enable Banking
- HAProxy vs Flybits
- HAProxy vs i2c
- HAProxy vs KeystoneJS
- HAProxy vs Liveblocks
- HAProxy vs Moesif
- Kong vs Caddy
- Kong vs Fastly
- Kong vs Jaeger
- Kong vs Vultr
- Kong vs Contabo
- Kong vs Koyeb
- Kong vs Fireworks AI
- Kong vs Go
- Kong vs Proxmox VE
- Kong vs VictoriaMetrics
- Kong vs Northflank
- Kong vs Oracle Cloud
- Kong vs Orca Security
- Kong vs Cilium
- Kong vs Thanos
- Kong vs Longhorn
- Kong vs minikube
- Kong vs OpenTelemetry
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif


