Cybersecurity · head to head
Grype vs Laserfiche

Grype
Cybersecurity
Vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Grype has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Grype depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem; Laserfiche self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- They diverge on capability: Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, Laserfiche covers Document Capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grype and Laserfiche actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grype | Laserfiche |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $50/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker | Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1976 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grype
- Image and filesystem scanning
- SBOM-driven
- Wide ecosystem coverage
- Pipeline friendly
Only in Laserfiche
- Document Capture
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
- Electronic Forms
- Process Automation
- Microsoft Office
- SharePoint
- Salesforce
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grype
- Re-scanning stored SBOMs as new CVEs are published, without rebuilding imagesnot Laserfiche
- Failing CI when a build introduces a known vulnerabilitynot Laserfiche
- Auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party imagenot Laserfiche
Laserfiche
- Citizen Servicesnot Grype
- Records Managementnot Grype
- Public Safetynot Grype
- Civic Engagementnot Grype
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grype
- Depends on public vulnerability databases, so coverage and false positives vary by ecosystem
- No triage, exception tracking or reporting UI — that is Anchore’s commercial product
- Overlaps heavily with Trivy, and most teams pick one rather than running both
Laserfiche
- Self-hosted deployment requires dedicated IT resources and infrastructure management
- Complex implementation often requires significant upfront customization
- High total cost of ownership for on-premises deployments due to infrastructure needs
Pricing, plan by plan
Grype
Free- GrypeFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Laserfiche
$50/month- Cloud$50/month
- Document Management
- Workflow Automation
- Records Management
Which should you pick?
Choose Grype if
- You need image and filesystem scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want sbom-driven.
Choose Laserfiche if
- You need document capture.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want workflow automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Grype or Laserfiche better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grype starts at Free and Laserfiche at $50/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grype or Laserfiche?
- Grype has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Grype and $50/month for Laserfiche.
- Does Grype or Laserfiche run on more platforms?
- Grype runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Laserfiche runs on Web, Mobile, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Grype for free?
- Yes. Grype has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Laserfiche starts at $50/month.
- What is Grype best used for?
- Grype is most often used for re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images, failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability, auditing what is actually installed inside a third-party image. Of those, re-scanning stored sboms as new cves are published, without rebuilding images and failing ci when a build introduces a known vulnerability are not what Laserfiche is typically brought in for.
- What can Grype do that Laserfiche cannot?
- Grype covers Image and filesystem scanning, SBOM-driven, Wide ecosystem coverage, Pipeline friendly. Laserfiche covers Document Capture, Workflow Automation, Records Management, Electronic Forms.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Grype: Is Grype free?
Yes, open source from Anchore. Anchore Enterprise is the paid platform around it.
Laserfiche: Does Laserfiche offer both cloud and self-hosted options?
Yes. Laserfiche Cloud offers three tiers (Starter $53/user/month, Professional $73, Business $93). Laserfiche 12 provides self-hosted deployment for organizations requiring on-premise infrastructure or with strict security and regulatory constraints.
SourceGrype: What is the difference between Grype and Syft?
Syft generates the software bill of materials; Grype matches that inventory against vulnerability data. They are designed to be used together.
Laserfiche: What does Laserfiche capture from documents?
Laserfiche provides document capture, electronic forms, workflow automation, case management, mobile access, and government-certified records management with automatic filing and retention schedules.
SourceGrype: Grype or Trivy?
They cover similar ground. Trivy is broader out of the box, including misconfiguration and secret scanning; Grype pairs more cleanly with an SBOM-first workflow.
Laserfiche: Can Laserfiche track document workflows automatically?
Yes. Laserfiche includes workflow automation that tracks and fulfills processes like FOIA requests, with access controls, audit trails, and automated recordkeeping for compliance.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Grype vs Trivy
- Grype vs Snyk
- Grype vs Semgrep
- Grype vs Chainguard
- Grype vs HashiCorp Vault
- Grype vs Bitwarden
- Grype vs Infisical
- Grype vs Authelia
- Grype vs Ory Kratos
- Grype vs OWASP ZAP
- Grype vs Cosign
- Grype vs authentik
- Grype vs Socket
- Grype vs Socure
- Grype vs SonicWall
- Grype vs Sophos Intercept X
- Grype vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Grype vs Sticky Password
- Grype vs DocuWare
- Grype vs OnBase
- Grype vs CivicPlus
- Grype vs Legistar
- Grype vs CKAN
- Grype vs Socrata
- Grype vs IAPro
- Grype vs SAP for Government
- Grype vs Axon Records
- Grype vs NextRequest
- Grype vs VUEWorks
- Grype vs ShotSpotter
- Grype vs Springbrook Software
- Grype vs Vigilant Solutions
- Grype vs Workday Government
- Grype vs Zencity
- Grype vs Granicus
- Grype vs Tyler Brazos
- Laserfiche vs Trivy
- Laserfiche vs Snyk
- Laserfiche vs Semgrep
- Laserfiche vs Chainguard
- Laserfiche vs HashiCorp Vault
- Laserfiche vs Bitwarden
- Laserfiche vs Infisical
- Laserfiche vs Authelia
- Laserfiche vs Ory Kratos
- Laserfiche vs OWASP ZAP
- Laserfiche vs Cosign
- Laserfiche vs authentik
- Laserfiche vs Socket
- Laserfiche vs Socure
- Laserfiche vs SonicWall
- Laserfiche vs Sophos Intercept X
- Laserfiche vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Laserfiche vs Sticky Password
- Laserfiche vs DocuWare
- Laserfiche vs OnBase
- Laserfiche vs CivicPlus
- Laserfiche vs Legistar
- Laserfiche vs CKAN
- Laserfiche vs Socrata
- Laserfiche vs IAPro
- Laserfiche vs SAP for Government
- Laserfiche vs Axon Records
- Laserfiche vs NextRequest
- Laserfiche vs VUEWorks
- Laserfiche vs ShotSpotter
- Laserfiche vs Springbrook Software
- Laserfiche vs Vigilant Solutions
- Laserfiche vs Workday Government
- Laserfiche vs Zencity
- Laserfiche vs Granicus
- Laserfiche vs Tyler Brazos

