Communication & Collaboration · head to head
Grasshopper vs HubSpot

Grasshopper
Communication & Collaboration
The entrepreneur's phone system
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HubSpot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries; HubSpot free tier limited to 2 users and 1,000 contacts; severely restricts growing teams
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Grasshopper and HubSpot actually diverge.
| Attribute | Grasshopper | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Mobile, Cloud |
| Category | Communication & Collaboration | All industries |
| Founded | Unknown | 2006 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that HubSpot does not also cover.
Only in HubSpot
- CRM
- Email marketing
- Marketing automation
- Sales pipeline
- Customer service
- Content management
- Analytics
- Social media
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
HubSpot
- Small businesses and startups using CRM, email marketing, sales pipeline, and customer service in single platformnot Grasshopper
- Organisations requiring integration with 2,000+ third-party applicationsnot Grasshopper
- Teams leveraging AI agents for prospecting, service automation, and data analysisnot Grasshopper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
HubSpot
- Free tier limited to 2 users and 1,000 contacts; severely restricts growing teams
- Many advanced features (automation workflows, custom objects, advanced reporting) gated to paid tiers
- Starter plan at $7/month per seat scales quickly for larger teams (300+ users would cost significantly more)
- Free tier removes credit card requirement but lacks most enterprise capabilities
Pricing, plan by plan
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
HubSpot
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the HubSpot review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from HubSpot on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose HubSpot if
- You need crm.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Cloud.
- You also want email marketing.
Questions people ask
- Is Grasshopper or HubSpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Grasshopper starts at On request and HubSpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Grasshopper or HubSpot?
- HubSpot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Grasshopper and Free for HubSpot.
- Does Grasshopper or HubSpot run on more platforms?
- Grasshopper runs on Web. HubSpot runs on Web, Mobile, Cloud.
- Can I use HubSpot for free?
- Yes. HubSpot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Grasshopper starts at On request.
- What can Grasshopper do that HubSpot cannot?
- HubSpot covers CRM, Email marketing, Marketing automation, Sales pipeline.
Related pages
More on Grasshopper
Other head to heads
- Grasshopper vs Zoom
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
- Grasshopper vs Loom
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Slack
- Grasshopper vs Telegram
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs Signal
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs Outreach
- Grasshopper vs Gong
- Grasshopper vs Seismic
- Grasshopper vs Pipedrive
- Grasshopper vs Salesforce
- Grasshopper vs Bitrix24
- Grasshopper vs Capsule
- Grasshopper vs Clari
- Grasshopper vs Freshsales
- Grasshopper vs Streak
- Grasshopper vs Zoho CRM
- Grasshopper vs Affinity
- Grasshopper vs Agile CRM
- Grasshopper vs Apollo.io
- Grasshopper vs Capsule CRM
- Grasshopper vs Clay
- Grasshopper vs Clearbit
- Grasshopper vs Cloze
- HubSpot vs Zoom
- HubSpot vs Microsoft Teams
- HubSpot vs Loom
- HubSpot vs RingCentral Video
- HubSpot vs Slack
- HubSpot vs Telegram
- HubSpot vs Webex by Cisco
- HubSpot vs Chanty
- HubSpot vs Chatwork
- HubSpot vs Flock
- HubSpot vs Google Chat
- HubSpot vs Lark
- HubSpot vs Mattermost
- HubSpot vs Quo
- HubSpot vs Rocket.Chat
- HubSpot vs Signal
- HubSpot vs TeamViewer
- HubSpot vs Textline
- HubSpot vs Outreach
- HubSpot vs Gong
- HubSpot vs Seismic
- HubSpot vs Pipedrive
- HubSpot vs Salesforce
- HubSpot vs Bitrix24
- HubSpot vs Capsule
- HubSpot vs Clari
- HubSpot vs Freshsales
- HubSpot vs Streak
- HubSpot vs Zoho CRM
- HubSpot vs Affinity
- HubSpot vs Agile CRM
- HubSpot vs Apollo.io
- HubSpot vs Capsule CRM
- HubSpot vs Clay
- HubSpot vs Clearbit
- HubSpot vs Cloze

