Software · head to head
Apollo.io vs Grasshopper
The short version
- Only Apollo.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apollo.io everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set; Grasshopper available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo.io and Grasshopper actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo.io
- Contact database
- Email finder
- Lead search
- Automation
- Engagement tracking
- Reporting
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
Only in Grasshopper
Nothing recorded that Apollo.io does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo.io
- Lead generationnot Grasshopper
- Prospect researchnot Grasshopper
- Sales automationnot Grasshopper
Grasshopper
No use cases recorded yet. See the Grasshopper review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo.io
- Everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- Plans described as unlimited are capped in the fair use policy at 10,000 credits a month for non-paying accounts
- Connecting a mailbox that is not Gmail or Microsoft requires a paid plan
- How many records can be selected at once varies by tier
- Running out of credits means buying more rather than waiting for a reset
Grasshopper
- Available only in the USA and Canada; the site returns a not available in your region error outside those countries
- Plans start at $14/month only under a promotional discount of up to $75 off select plans, meaning the advertised entry price is not the standing rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo.io
Free- FreeFree
- Basic contact search
- Limited searches
- Starter$49/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email finder
- Professional$149/month
- Everything in Starter
- Automation
- Advanced analytics
Grasshopper
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Grasshopper review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo.io if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email finder.
Choose Grasshopper if
Nothing in the data separates Grasshopper from Apollo.io on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo.io or Grasshopper better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo.io starts at Free and Grasshopper at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo.io or Grasshopper?
- Apollo.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apollo.io and On request for Grasshopper.
- Does Apollo.io or Grasshopper run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Apollo.io for free?
- Yes. Apollo.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Grasshopper starts at On request.
- What is Apollo.io best used for?
- Apollo.io is most often used for lead generation, prospect research, sales automation. Of those, lead generation and prospect research are not what Grasshopper is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo.io do that Grasshopper cannot?
- Apollo.io covers Contact database, Email finder, Lead search, Automation.
Related pages
More on Grasshopper
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Apollo.io vs Outreach
- Apollo.io vs Gong
- Apollo.io vs Seismic
- Apollo.io vs Pipedrive
- Apollo.io vs HubSpot
- Apollo.io vs Salesforce
- Apollo.io vs Bitrix24
- Apollo.io vs Capsule
- Apollo.io vs Clari
- Apollo.io vs Freshsales
- Apollo.io vs Streak
- Apollo.io vs Zoho CRM
- Apollo.io vs Affinity
- Apollo.io vs Agile CRM
- Apollo.io vs Capsule CRM
- Apollo.io vs Clay
- Apollo.io vs Clearbit
- Apollo.io vs Cloze
- Apollo.io vs Zoom
- Apollo.io vs Microsoft Teams
- Apollo.io vs Loom
- Apollo.io vs RingCentral Video
- Apollo.io vs Slack
- Apollo.io vs Telegram
- Apollo.io vs Webex by Cisco
- Apollo.io vs Chanty
- Apollo.io vs Chatwork
- Apollo.io vs Flock
- Apollo.io vs Google Chat
- Apollo.io vs Lark
- Apollo.io vs Mattermost
- Apollo.io vs Quo
- Apollo.io vs Rocket.Chat
- Apollo.io vs Signal
- Apollo.io vs TeamViewer
- Apollo.io vs Textline
- Grasshopper vs Outreach
- Grasshopper vs Gong
- Grasshopper vs Seismic
- Grasshopper vs Pipedrive
- Grasshopper vs HubSpot
- Grasshopper vs Salesforce
- Grasshopper vs Bitrix24
- Grasshopper vs Capsule
- Grasshopper vs Clari
- Grasshopper vs Freshsales
- Grasshopper vs Streak
- Grasshopper vs Zoho CRM
- Grasshopper vs Affinity
- Grasshopper vs Agile CRM
- Grasshopper vs Capsule CRM
- Grasshopper vs Clay
- Grasshopper vs Clearbit
- Grasshopper vs Cloze
- Grasshopper vs Zoom
- Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
- Grasshopper vs Loom
- Grasshopper vs RingCentral Video
- Grasshopper vs Slack
- Grasshopper vs Telegram
- Grasshopper vs Webex by Cisco
- Grasshopper vs Chanty
- Grasshopper vs Chatwork
- Grasshopper vs Flock
- Grasshopper vs Google Chat
- Grasshopper vs Lark
- Grasshopper vs Mattermost
- Grasshopper vs Quo
- Grasshopper vs Rocket.Chat
- Grasshopper vs Signal
- Grasshopper vs TeamViewer
- Grasshopper vs Textline


