APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Zipkin
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Zipkin actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Zipkin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Zipkin
- Schema federationnot Zipkin
- API analytics and monitoringnot Zipkin
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot GraphQL Apollo
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot GraphQL Apollo
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Zipkin?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Zipkin cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Jaeger
- GraphQL Apollo vs Grafana Cloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs VictoriaMetrics
- GraphQL Apollo vs Deno Deploy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Anyscale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cerebrium
- GraphQL Apollo vs Go
- GraphQL Apollo vs Orca Security
- GraphQL Apollo vs Heroku
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vault
- GraphQL Apollo vs Beam Cloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs Caddy
- GraphQL Apollo vs DeepInfra
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpenTelemetry
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thanos
- GraphQL Apollo vs Linkerd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Longhorn
- Zipkin vs Hasura
- Zipkin vs Appwrite
- Zipkin vs PocketBase
- Zipkin vs Sanity
- Zipkin vs Strapi
- Zipkin vs GraphQL Playground
- Zipkin vs Kong Gateway
- Zipkin vs Parse Server
- Zipkin vs WSO2 API Manager
- Zipkin vs Janus Gateway
- Zipkin vs Directus
- Zipkin vs KeystoneJS
- Zipkin vs Solaris
- Zipkin vs Stainless
- Zipkin vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Zipkin vs Thredd
- Zipkin vs Thunder Client
- Zipkin vs Jaeger
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs VictoriaMetrics
- Zipkin vs Deno Deploy
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Orca Security
- Zipkin vs Heroku
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs DeepInfra
- Zipkin vs OpenTelemetry
- Zipkin vs Thanos
- Zipkin vs Linkerd
- Zipkin vs Longhorn


