APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Terragrunt

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Terragrunt
- Schema federationnot Terragrunt
- API analytics and monitoringnot Terragrunt
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot GraphQL Apollo
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot GraphQL Apollo
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Terragrunt?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Terragrunt cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Pulumi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Infracost
- GraphQL Apollo vs Packer
- GraphQL Apollo vs Serverless Framework
- GraphQL Apollo vs SST
- GraphQL Apollo vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cerebrium
- GraphQL Apollo vs Go
- GraphQL Apollo vs Rancher
- GraphQL Apollo vs Anyscale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Linkerd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure
- GraphQL Apollo vs Nitric
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpenEBS
- GraphQL Apollo vs OVHcloud
- GraphQL Apollo vs Nomad
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Hasura
- Terragrunt vs Appwrite
- Terragrunt vs PocketBase
- Terragrunt vs Sanity
- Terragrunt vs Strapi
- Terragrunt vs GraphQL Playground
- Terragrunt vs Kong Gateway
- Terragrunt vs Parse Server
- Terragrunt vs WSO2 API Manager
- Terragrunt vs Janus Gateway
- Terragrunt vs Directus
- Terragrunt vs KeystoneJS
- Terragrunt vs Solaris
- Terragrunt vs Stainless
- Terragrunt vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Terragrunt vs Thredd
- Terragrunt vs Thunder Client
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant

