APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Terragrunt

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Terragrunt
Cloud
The Open Source IaC Orchestrator Platform Teams Trust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Terragrunt additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Terragrunt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Terragrunt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Unknown |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2017 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Terragrunt
- Infrastructure orchestration
- Run Queue
- DRY configuration
- Automated hooks
- Infrastructure catalog
- Least-privilege access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Terragrunt
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Terragrunt
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Terragrunt
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Terragrunt
Terragrunt
- Organizing Terraform code across multiple environmentsnot Kong Gateway
- Automating infrastructure deployment workflowsnot Kong Gateway
- Implementing infrastructure as code templates for developer self-servicenot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Terragrunt
- Additional complexity layer on top of Terraform
- Requires understanding of Terraform concepts
- Paid tier pricing not clearly published
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Terragrunt
Free- Open SourceFree
- Terragrunt CLI - completely free
- Community support
- Terragrunt Scale FreeFree
- Free CI/CD pipeline
- Unlimited runs and resources
- For up to 25 infrastructure units
- Terragrunt Scale Paid$undefined/custom
- Volume pricing for more than 25 infrastructure units
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Terragrunt if
- You need infrastructure orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- You also want run queue.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Terragrunt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Terragrunt?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Terragrunt at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Terragrunt run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Terragrunt runs on AWS, Azure, GCP.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Terragrunt is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Terragrunt cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Terragrunt covers Infrastructure orchestration, Run Queue, DRY configuration, Automated hooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceTerragrunt: Is Terragrunt free?
Yes, the Terragrunt CLI is completely free and open source. Terragrunt Scale offers a free tier for up to 25 infrastructure units.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceTerragrunt: What is the difference between Terragrunt and Terraform?
Terragrunt is an orchestration layer on top of Terraform that handles state management, DRY principles, and deployment automation without replacing Terraform itself.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs Pulumi
- Kong Gateway vs Infracost
- Kong Gateway vs Packer
- Kong Gateway vs Serverless Framework
- Kong Gateway vs SST
- Kong Gateway vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Kong Gateway vs Cerebrium
- Kong Gateway vs Go
- Kong Gateway vs Rancher
- Kong Gateway vs Anyscale
- Kong Gateway vs Linkerd
- Kong Gateway vs Microsoft Azure
- Kong Gateway vs Nitric
- Kong Gateway vs OpenEBS
- Kong Gateway vs OVHcloud
- Kong Gateway vs Nomad
- Kong Gateway vs Vagrant
- Terragrunt vs Tyk
- Terragrunt vs Moesif
- Terragrunt vs Treblle
- Terragrunt vs Convoy
- Terragrunt vs Janus Gateway
- Terragrunt vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Terragrunt vs Gravitee
- Terragrunt vs Strapi
- Terragrunt vs WSO2 API Manager
- Terragrunt vs AWS API Gateway
- Terragrunt vs GraphQL Apollo
- Terragrunt vs Appwrite
- Terragrunt vs Payload CMS
- Terragrunt vs Portkey
- Terragrunt vs Prisma
- Terragrunt vs RapidAPI
- Terragrunt vs REST Client VSCode
- Terragrunt vs Rutter
- Terragrunt vs Pulumi
- Terragrunt vs Infracost
- Terragrunt vs Packer
- Terragrunt vs Serverless Framework
- Terragrunt vs SST
- Terragrunt vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Terragrunt vs Cerebrium
- Terragrunt vs Go
- Terragrunt vs Rancher
- Terragrunt vs Anyscale
- Terragrunt vs Linkerd
- Terragrunt vs Microsoft Azure
- Terragrunt vs Nitric
- Terragrunt vs OpenEBS
- Terragrunt vs OVHcloud
- Terragrunt vs Nomad
- Terragrunt vs Vagrant
