APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Memcached
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Memcached actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Memcached |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Category | APIs | Databases |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Memcached
- Schema federationnot Memcached
- API analytics and monitoringnot Memcached
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot GraphQL Apollo
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot GraphQL Apollo
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Memcached?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Memcached run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Memcached cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceMemcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Dragonfly
- GraphQL Apollo vs Valkey
- GraphQL Apollo vs Readyset
- GraphQL Apollo vs PostgreSQL
- GraphQL Apollo vs DuckDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs DynamoDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs NATS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Pulsar
- GraphQL Apollo vs Presto
- GraphQL Apollo vs Timeplus
- GraphQL Apollo vs RabbitMQ
- GraphQL Apollo vs EMQX
- GraphQL Apollo vs FaunaDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs Firebase Realtime Database
- GraphQL Apollo vs MotherDuck
- GraphQL Apollo vs Neo4j
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Kafka
- GraphQL Apollo vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Hasura
- Memcached vs Appwrite
- Memcached vs PocketBase
- Memcached vs Sanity
- Memcached vs Strapi
- Memcached vs GraphQL Playground
- Memcached vs Kong Gateway
- Memcached vs Parse Server
- Memcached vs WSO2 API Manager
- Memcached vs Janus Gateway
- Memcached vs Directus
- Memcached vs KeystoneJS
- Memcached vs Solaris
- Memcached vs Stainless
- Memcached vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Memcached vs Thredd
- Memcached vs Thunder Client
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore

