APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Timeplus

Timeplus
Databases
Streaming SQL engine built on ClickHouse internals, shipping as one small binary
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Timeplus proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Timeplus covers Streaming SQL.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Timeplus actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Timeplus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Per month for cloud, quoted for self-hosted |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web |
| Category | APIs | Databases |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Timeplus
- Streaming SQL
- Unified streaming and historical
- ClickHouse-based engine
- Single binary deployment
- External streams
- Materialised views
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Timeplus
- Schema federationnot Timeplus
- API analytics and monitoringnot Timeplus
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Timeplus
Timeplus
- Real-time alerting on Kafka topics where standing up a Flink cluster is more work than the use case justifiesnot GraphQL Apollo
- Fraud or anomaly detection that must join a live event stream against recent history in one querynot GraphQL Apollo
- Streaming ETL from Kafka or MySQL change data capture into ClickHouse without writing Javanot GraphQL Apollo
- A small data team that needs continuous aggregation but has no platform engineers to operate JVM infrastructurenot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Timeplus
- Proton, the free version, is single-node by design, so any requirement for high availability or horizontal scale forces the commercial licence; the open source edition is a trial in practical terms.
- It is a young project against Apache Flink’s decade of production history, so the hiring pool, the connector library and the body of known failure modes are all much smaller.
- Inheriting ClickHouse internals also inherits ClickHouse constraints: memory-hungry queries, awkward updates and a SQL dialect that is not portable to other engines.
- Exactly-once semantics and state recovery guarantees are less battle-tested than Flink checkpointing, which matters if the pipeline moves money.
- Cloud pricing is by provisioned instance size rather than usage, so a bursty workload pays for peak capacity around the clock or has to be resized by hand.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Timeplus
Free- Timeplus ProtonFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Single node only
- Full streaming SQL engine
- Timeplus Cloud$199/month
- One to thirty-two CPUs
- 4 GB to 128 GB memory
- From 250 GB SSD storage
- Self-hosted or BYOC$undefined/year
- Multi-node clustering
- Kubernetes or bare metal
- Customisable compute and storage
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Timeplus if
- You need streaming sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want unified streaming and historical.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Timeplus better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Timeplus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Timeplus?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Timeplus at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Timeplus run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Timeplus runs on Linux, macOS, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Timeplus is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Timeplus cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Timeplus covers Streaming SQL, Unified streaming and historical, ClickHouse-based engine, Single binary deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceTimeplus: Is Timeplus open source?
The core engine, Timeplus Proton, is Apache 2.0. Timeplus Enterprise and Cloud are commercial.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceTimeplus: What is the difference from Flink?
Timeplus is one binary with SQL as the only interface; Flink is a JVM cluster with a Java and SQL API and far more operational surface.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceTimeplus: Can Proton run in production?
It can, but it is single-node only, so there is no high availability without the commercial edition.
Timeplus: How much is the cloud?
From 199 US dollars a month, sized by CPU and memory, with a fourteen day trial.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Flink
- GraphQL Apollo vs ClickHouse
- GraphQL Apollo vs Materialize
- GraphQL Apollo vs Redpanda
- GraphQL Apollo vs NATS
- GraphQL Apollo vs DuckDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs Estuary
- GraphQL Apollo vs RisingWave
- GraphQL Apollo vs Meilisearch
- GraphQL Apollo vs Neo4j
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpenSearch
- GraphQL Apollo vs Qdrant
- GraphQL Apollo vs SingleStore
- GraphQL Apollo vs TiDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tinybird
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Kafka
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Pulsar
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Druid
- Timeplus vs Hasura
- Timeplus vs Appwrite
- Timeplus vs PocketBase
- Timeplus vs Sanity
- Timeplus vs Strapi
- Timeplus vs GraphQL Playground
- Timeplus vs Kong Gateway
- Timeplus vs Parse Server
- Timeplus vs WSO2 API Manager
- Timeplus vs Janus Gateway
- Timeplus vs Directus
- Timeplus vs KeystoneJS
- Timeplus vs Solaris
- Timeplus vs Stainless
- Timeplus vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Timeplus vs Thredd
- Timeplus vs Thunder Client
- Timeplus vs Apache Flink
- Timeplus vs ClickHouse
- Timeplus vs Materialize
- Timeplus vs Redpanda
- Timeplus vs NATS
- Timeplus vs DuckDB
- Timeplus vs Estuary
- Timeplus vs RisingWave
- Timeplus vs Meilisearch
- Timeplus vs Neo4j
- Timeplus vs OpenSearch
- Timeplus vs Qdrant
- Timeplus vs SingleStore
- Timeplus vs TiDB
- Timeplus vs Tinybird
- Timeplus vs Apache Kafka
- Timeplus vs Apache Pulsar
- Timeplus vs Apache Druid

