Databases · head to head
DuckDB vs GraphQL Apollo

DuckDB
Databases
MIT-licensed analytical SQL database that runs inside your process, with no server, no dependencies and one writer at a time.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DuckDB a database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: DuckDB covers In-process execution, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DuckDB and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | DuckDB | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Category | Databases | APIs |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DuckDB
- In-process execution
- Vectorised columnar engine
- Direct file querying
- Zero dependencies
- Larger-than-memory queries
- MIT licence
- Postgres-flavoured SQL
- Extension ecosystem
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DuckDB
- Transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need Spark, replaced by SQL over Parquet in a single processnot GraphQL Apollo
- Analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptablenot GraphQL Apollo
- Local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehousenot GraphQL Apollo
- Continuous integration and testing of analytical SQL, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anythingnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot DuckDB
- Schema federationnot DuckDB
- API analytics and monitoringnot DuckDB
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot DuckDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DuckDB
- A database file accepts one read-write process at a time; other processes must open it read-only and will not see subsequent writes, so DuckDB cannot be the shared database behind several services.
- There is no network protocol, authentication or user management, so exposing it to remote clients means writing and securing your own service around it.
- It is built for scans and aggregations, not for many small transactions, so a workload of high-frequency single-row inserts and updates performs badly compared with SQLite or Postgres.
- Storage files are backwards compatible but not forwards compatible, so a file written by a newer version cannot be read by an older one and every consumer of a shared file must be upgraded together.
- Query memory settings matter: some operations still need to hold significant state, so an under-configured memory limit turns a large join or a high-cardinality aggregation into a spill-heavy query or an out-of-memory failure rather than a slow success.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
DuckDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DuckDB review.
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose DuckDB if
- You need in-process execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly.
- You also want vectorised columnar engine.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is DuckDB or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. DuckDB starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DuckDB or GraphQL Apollo?
- DuckDB starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does DuckDB or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- DuckDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, WebAssembly. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use DuckDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DuckDB best used for?
- DuckDB is most often used for transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process, analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable, local exploration of files that are too large for a pandas dataframe but far too small to justify a warehouse, continuous integration and testing of analytical sql, where a real engine can run in the test process without provisioning anything. Of those, transformation steps in a data pipeline that would otherwise need spark, replaced by sql over parquet in a single process and analytical queries embedded in an application or a dashboard where shipping a database server alongside it is not acceptable are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can DuckDB do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- DuckDB covers In-process execution, Vectorised columnar engine, Direct file querying, Zero dependencies. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DuckDB: Can multiple applications share one DuckDB database?
Not for writing. One process holds the database read-write; others may attach read-only and will not see later writes. Shared multi-writer access needs a different database or a table format with a catalogue.
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceDuckDB: Is it a replacement for a data warehouse?
For single-node analytical workloads up to a few hundred gigabytes it very often is. It is not a replacement when many concurrent users need a shared, governed, always-on service.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceDuckDB: Do I have to load data into it?
No. It queries Parquet, CSV, JSON and Arrow in place, including on object storage. Its own storage format is optional and mainly useful when you want indexes, constraints and faster repeated access.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceDuckDB: What is MotherDuck's relationship to it?
MotherDuck is a separate company offering a managed and hybrid service built on the DuckDB engine. DuckDB itself remains MIT-licensed and independent of it, with the IP held by the DuckDB Foundation.
DuckDB: Is it suitable for OLTP?
No. It is designed for analytical scans. For transactional workloads with frequent small writes, SQLite or Postgres is the right tool.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- DuckDB vs SingleStore
- DuckDB vs SQLite
- DuckDB vs PostgreSQL
- DuckDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DuckDB vs Airtable
- DuckDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DuckDB vs ClickHouse
- DuckDB vs Apache Druid
- DuckDB vs Firebolt
- DuckDB vs OpenSearch
- DuckDB vs StarRocks
- DuckDB vs DataGrip
- DuckDB vs Estuary
- DuckDB vs Apache Pinot
- DuckDB vs Apache Pulsar
- DuckDB vs Cassandra
- DuckDB vs CouchDB
- DuckDB vs Hasura
- DuckDB vs Appwrite
- DuckDB vs PocketBase
- DuckDB vs Sanity
- DuckDB vs Strapi
- DuckDB vs GraphQL Playground
- DuckDB vs Kong Gateway
- DuckDB vs Parse Server
- DuckDB vs WSO2 API Manager
- DuckDB vs Janus Gateway
- DuckDB vs Directus
- DuckDB vs KeystoneJS
- DuckDB vs Solaris
- DuckDB vs Stainless
- DuckDB vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- DuckDB vs Thredd
- DuckDB vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs SingleStore
- GraphQL Apollo vs SQLite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PostgreSQL
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cockroach Labs
- GraphQL Apollo vs Airtable
- GraphQL Apollo vs Amazon Aurora
- GraphQL Apollo vs ClickHouse
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Druid
- GraphQL Apollo vs Firebolt
- GraphQL Apollo vs OpenSearch
- GraphQL Apollo vs StarRocks
- GraphQL Apollo vs DataGrip
- GraphQL Apollo vs Estuary
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Pinot
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apache Pulsar
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cassandra
- GraphQL Apollo vs CouchDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

