Databases · head to head
Google Cloud SQL vs ScyllaDB

Google Cloud SQL
Databases
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Google Cloud SQL locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Google Cloud SQL and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Google Cloud SQL | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Google Cloud Platform | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web |
| Founded | 2008 | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Google Cloud SQL
- High Availability
- Automated Backups
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Regional/Zonal Instances
- Read Replicas
- Private IP
- BigQuery
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Kubernetes
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Google Cloud SQL
- Transaction processingnot ScyllaDB
- Data storagenot ScyllaDB
- Application backendnot ScyllaDB
- Reportingnot ScyllaDB
- Data analyticsnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Google Cloud SQL
- Content managementnot Google Cloud SQL
- User profilesnot Google Cloud SQL
- Mobile backendsnot Google Cloud SQL
- Cachingnot Google Cloud SQL
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Google Cloud SQL
- Locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive with unpredictable workloads
- Limited customization options compared to self-managed databases
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Google Cloud SQL
Free- Free TierFree
- db-f1-micro instance
- 30GB storage
- Limited usage
- Standard$25/month
- High availability
- Automated backups
- Point-in-time recovery
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Google Cloud SQL if
- You need high availability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want automated backups.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Google Cloud SQL or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Google Cloud SQL starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Google Cloud SQL or ScyllaDB?
- Google Cloud SQL starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Google Cloud SQL or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Google Cloud SQL runs on Google Cloud Platform. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Google Cloud SQL for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Google Cloud SQL best used for?
- Google Cloud SQL is most often used for transaction processing, data storage, application backend, reporting. Of those, transaction processing and data storage are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Google Cloud SQL do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, Automated Backups, Point-in-time Recovery, Encryption. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Kubernetes, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Google Cloud SQL: What database engines does Google Cloud SQL support?
Google Cloud SQL supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. Users can choose their preferred engine when provisioning an instance and Google handles automated backups, replication, patching, and scaling.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Does Google Cloud SQL have a free tier?
Google Cloud SQL does not have a free tier, though new users receive free trial credits from Google Cloud Platform. Pricing is based on compute resources (CPU and memory) and storage used, with options for committed use discounts.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceGoogle Cloud SQL: Can Google Cloud SQL scale automatically?
Yes. Cloud SQL automatically scales database storage and compute resources to handle increased workloads without manual intervention, and includes automated backups and high availability configurations.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
More on Google Cloud SQL
Other head to heads
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS
- Google Cloud SQL vs Azure SQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cockroach Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Aiven
- Google Cloud SQL vs PostgreSQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs MariaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataStax
- Google Cloud SQL vs FaunaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs ArangoDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Canary Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Chroma
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cloudinary
- Google Cloud SQL vs Convex
- Google Cloud SQL vs Dgraph
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Aurora
- Google Cloud SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Redshift
- Google Cloud SQL vs CosmosDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Airtable
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cassandra
- Google Cloud SQL vs Couchbase
- Google Cloud SQL vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Google Cloud SQL vs RavenDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataGrip
- Google Cloud SQL vs turbopuffer
- Google Cloud SQL vs VerneMQ
- Google Cloud SQL vs Vespa
- Google Cloud SQL vs Xata
- Google Cloud SQL vs YugabyteDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Zilliz
- Google Cloud SQL vs DynamoDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon RDS
- ScyllaDB vs Azure SQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs Aiven
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs MariaDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs FaunaDB
- ScyllaDB vs ArangoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Canary Labs
- ScyllaDB vs Chroma
- ScyllaDB vs Cloudinary
- ScyllaDB vs Convex
- ScyllaDB vs Dgraph
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- ScyllaDB vs CosmosDB
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
