Databases · head to head
Convex vs Google Cloud SQL

Convex
Databases
Reactive backend combining a document database, TypeScript server functions and live queries, source-available under the Functional Source Licence.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Google Cloud SQL
Databases
Fully managed relational database service for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convex the Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.; Google Cloud SQL locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- They diverge on capability: Convex covers Reactive queries, Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convex and Google Cloud SQL actually diverge.
| Attribute | Convex | Google Cloud SQL |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | usage-based |
| Platforms | Web | Google Cloud Platform |
| Founded | Unknown | 2008 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convex
- Reactive queries
- TypeScript server functions
- ACID transactions
- Document database
- Scheduling and workflows
- File storage
- Text and vector search
- End-to-end types
Only in Google Cloud SQL
- High Availability
- Automated Backups
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Regional/Zonal Instances
- Read Replicas
- Private IP
- BigQuery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convex
- Collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediatelynot Google Cloud SQL
- Agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cachenot Google Cloud SQL
- Small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineersnot Google Cloud SQL
- Prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end TypeScript types remove a class of integration bugsnot Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
- Transaction processingnot Convex
- Data storagenot Convex
- Application backendnot Convex
- Reportingnot Convex
- Data analyticsnot Convex
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convex
- The Functional Source Licence is not an OSI open source licence: competing use is prohibited until each release reaches its second anniversary and converts to Apache 2.0, so you may self-host but you may not build a service on it.
- Transactions are bounded at one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written, so every backfill, migration or bulk import has to be chunked into scheduled batches rather than written as a single operation.
- There is no SQL and no query planner; you declare up to 32 indexes per table and traverse them, and joins are loops in TypeScript, so an unanticipated access pattern requires a schema and index change rather than a new query.
- It is not an analytical database, so reporting means streaming data out to a warehouse and BI tools cannot be pointed at Convex directly, which adds a pipeline the architecture diagram did not originally include.
- The application is written against Convex's function and client APIs rather than a standard protocol, so leaving means rewriting the data access layer and replacing the reactivity model, not repointing a connection string.
Google Cloud SQL
- Locked into Google Cloud ecosystem with limited cross-cloud portability
- Pay-as-you-go pricing can become expensive with unpredictable workloads
- Limited customization options compared to self-managed databases
Pricing, plan by plan
Convex
Free- Free & StarterFree
- Supports 1-6 developers
- Reactive database
- File storage
- Professional$25/month per developer
- Supports up to 20 developers
- All Starter features
- Log streaming
- Business & Enterprise$2500/month minimum
- Supports 50+ developers
- SAML/SSO
- Service SLAs
Google Cloud SQL
Free- Free TierFree
- db-f1-micro instance
- 30GB storage
- Limited usage
- Standard$25/month
- High availability
- Automated backups
- Point-in-time recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose Convex if
- You need reactive queries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want typescript server functions.
Choose Google Cloud SQL if
- You need high availability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Google Cloud Platform.
- You also want automated backups.
Questions people ask
- Is Convex or Google Cloud SQL better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convex starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convex or Google Cloud SQL?
- Convex starts at Free and Google Cloud SQL at Free.
- Does Convex or Google Cloud SQL run on more platforms?
- Convex runs on Web. Google Cloud SQL runs on Google Cloud Platform.
- Can I use Convex for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convex best used for?
- Convex is most often used for collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately, agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache, small product teams who need a complete backend, including auth integration, file storage and subscriptions, without hiring infrastructure engineers, prototypes that must become production without a rewrite of the data layer, where end-to-end typescript types remove a class of integration bugs. Of those, collaborative applications where several users see the same data and every client must reflect a change immediately and agent backends that need durable state, scheduled work and transactional writes without assembling a queue, a database and a cache are not what Google Cloud SQL is typically brought in for.
- What can Convex do that Google Cloud SQL cannot?
- Convex covers Reactive queries, TypeScript server functions, ACID transactions, Document database. Google Cloud SQL covers High Availability, Automated Backups, Point-in-time Recovery, Encryption.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convex: Is Convex open source?
It is source-available under FSL-1.1-Apache-2.0. You may read, modify and self-host it, but competing use is prohibited until each release converts to Apache 2.0 on its second anniversary.
Google Cloud SQL: What database engines does Google Cloud SQL support?
Google Cloud SQL supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. Users can choose their preferred engine when provisioning an instance and Google handles automated backups, replication, patching, and scaling.
SourceConvex: Can I self-host it?
Yes. The backend, dashboard and CLI can run on your own infrastructure, with most of the features of the cloud product. Self-hosted instances include a telemetry beacon that can be disabled.
Google Cloud SQL: Does Google Cloud SQL have a free tier?
Google Cloud SQL does not have a free tier, though new users receive free trial credits from Google Cloud Platform. Pricing is based on compute resources (CPU and memory) and storage used, with options for committed use discounts.
SourceConvex: Does it support SQL?
No. Data is accessed through a TypeScript query builder over declared indexes. Relationships are traversed in code, which is explicit and type-safe but means no ad hoc querying.
Google Cloud SQL: Can Google Cloud SQL scale automatically?
Yes. Cloud SQL automatically scales database storage and compute resources to handle increased workloads without manual intervention, and includes automated backups and high availability configurations.
SourceConvex: What happens if a mutation exceeds the limits?
It fails rather than running longer, so bulk work must be split into batches and scheduled. The limits are per transaction: one second of user code, 16 MiB read and written, 32,000 documents scanned and 16,000 written.
Convex: How does reactivity actually work?
Queries are deterministic functions and Convex records the data each one read. When a mutation changes that data, affected queries are re-run and subscribed clients receive the new result, so cache invalidation is handled by the platform.
Related pages
More on Google Cloud SQL
Other head to heads
- Convex vs PostgreSQL
- Convex vs Airtable
- Convex vs Cockroach Labs
- Convex vs Amazon Aurora
- Convex vs Readyset
- Convex vs FaunaDB
- Convex vs LanceDB
- Convex vs Xata
- Convex vs Materialize
- Convex vs BigQuery
- Convex vs dbt
- Convex vs Apache Doris
- Convex vs ArangoDB
- Convex vs Canary Labs
- Convex vs Chroma
- Convex vs Cloudinary
- Convex vs DynamoDB
- Convex vs Apache Solr
- Convex vs Amazon RDS
- Convex vs Azure SQL
- Convex vs Aiven
- Convex vs MariaDB
- Convex vs DataStax
- Convex vs Dgraph
- Convex vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Convex vs Amazon Redshift
- Convex vs CosmosDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs PostgreSQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs Airtable
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cockroach Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Aurora
- Google Cloud SQL vs Readyset
- Google Cloud SQL vs FaunaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs LanceDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Xata
- Google Cloud SQL vs Materialize
- Google Cloud SQL vs BigQuery
- Google Cloud SQL vs dbt
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Doris
- Google Cloud SQL vs ArangoDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Canary Labs
- Google Cloud SQL vs Chroma
- Google Cloud SQL vs Cloudinary
- Google Cloud SQL vs DynamoDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs Apache Solr
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon RDS
- Google Cloud SQL vs Azure SQL
- Google Cloud SQL vs Aiven
- Google Cloud SQL vs MariaDB
- Google Cloud SQL vs DataStax
- Google Cloud SQL vs Dgraph
- Google Cloud SQL vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Google Cloud SQL vs Amazon Redshift
- Google Cloud SQL vs CosmosDB
