Database & Data Management · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs ScyllaDB

Cockroach Labs
Database & Data Management
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Database & Data Management
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); ScyllaDB aWS Marketplace lists ScyllaDB Enterprise (sold directly by ScyllaDB, Inc) at $1.63 per hour for the recommended i3.4xlarge instance size, license and enterprise support bundled in
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management), founded (2015).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Kubernetes
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot ScyllaDB
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Cockroach Labs
- Content managementnot Cockroach Labs
- User profilesnot Cockroach Labs
- Mobile backendsnot Cockroach Labs
- Cachingnot Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
ScyllaDB
- AWS Marketplace lists ScyllaDB Enterprise (sold directly by ScyllaDB, Inc) at $1.63 per hour for the recommended i3.4xlarge instance size, license and enterprise support bundled in
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
ScyllaDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Community support
- Self-managed
- Cloud$0.3/hour
- Managed service
- Pay per hour
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or ScyllaDB?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Kubernetes.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs PlanetScale
- ScyllaDB vs Azure SQL
- ScyllaDB vs ClickHouse
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DuckDB
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs MariaDB
- ScyllaDB vs Oracle Database
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon RDS
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Druid
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Firebolt
