Machine Learning · head to head
Milvus vs ScyllaDB

Milvus
Machine Learning
Open-source vector database for scalable similarity search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Milvus vector dimensions are capped at 32,768; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Milvus and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Milvus
- Billion-scale vectors
- Multiple index types
- GPU acceleration
- Hybrid search
- Data partitioning
- PyTorch
- TensorFlow
- Hugging Face
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Linux support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Milvus
- Self hosting a vector database for semantic searchnot ScyllaDB
- Storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generationnot ScyllaDB
- Similarity search over images, audio or text at scalenot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Milvus
- Content managementnot Milvus
- User profilesnot Milvus
- Mobile backendsnot Milvus
- Cachingnot Milvus
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Milvus
- Vector dimensions are capped at 32,768
- A collection is limited to 64 fields, 1,024 partitions and 16 shards
- Only 1 index is allowed per field
- Search returns at most 16,384 vectors as top-k, and nq is capped at 16,384
- Input and output per RPC is capped at 64 MB for insert, search and query
- VARCHAR values are limited to 65,535 characters
- Data loaded into query nodes cannot exceed 90% of available memory
- An instance supports at most 65,536 collections
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Milvus
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full features
- Self-hosted
- Community support
- Zilliz CloudFree
- Managed service
- Free tier available
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Milvus if
- You need billion-scale vectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web.
- You also want multiple index types.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Milvus or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Milvus starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Milvus or ScyllaDB?
- Milvus starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Milvus or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Milvus runs on Linux, Mac, Windows, Web. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Milvus for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Milvus best used for?
- Milvus is most often used for self hosting a vector database for semantic search, storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generation, similarity search over images, audio or text at scale. Of those, self hosting a vector database for semantic search and storing and querying embeddings for retrieval augmented generation are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Milvus do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Milvus covers Billion-scale vectors, Multiple index types, GPU acceleration, Hybrid search. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Linux support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Milvus: How much does Milvus cost?
Milvus is open-source and free to use and modify. The self-hosted version has no licensing cost. Zilliz Cloud (the managed SaaS version) does not publish pricing on the website.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceMilvus: Is there a free or open-source version of Milvus?
Yes, Milvus is fully open-source and available for free. Milvus Lite is a lightweight option for learning and prototyping that can be installed via pip.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceMilvus: Does Milvus offer a managed cloud service?
Yes, Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus cloud offering with serverless and dedicated cluster options. Pricing must be requested from the company as it is not listed on the public website.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Milvus vs Google Vertex AI
- Milvus vs AWS SageMaker
- Milvus vs Azure Machine Learning
- Milvus vs DataRobot
- Milvus vs Pinecone
- Milvus vs Weaviate
- Milvus vs Ray
- Milvus vs Fal AI
- Milvus vs Jupyter
- Milvus vs Keras
- Milvus vs LangChain
- Milvus vs Weights & Biases
- Milvus vs Alteryx
- Milvus vs Anaconda
- Milvus vs Domino Data Lab
- Milvus vs DVC
- Milvus vs Semantic Kernel
- Milvus vs Amazon Aurora
- Milvus vs Airtable
- Milvus vs Cockroach Labs
- Milvus vs PostgreSQL
- Milvus vs Cassandra
- Milvus vs Couchbase
- Milvus vs DataStax
- Milvus vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Milvus vs RavenDB
- Milvus vs DataGrip
- Milvus vs turbopuffer
- Milvus vs VerneMQ
- Milvus vs Vespa
- Milvus vs Xata
- Milvus vs YugabyteDB
- Milvus vs Zilliz
- Milvus vs DynamoDB
- Milvus vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Google Vertex AI
- ScyllaDB vs AWS SageMaker
- ScyllaDB vs Azure Machine Learning
- ScyllaDB vs DataRobot
- ScyllaDB vs Pinecone
- ScyllaDB vs Weaviate
- ScyllaDB vs Ray
- ScyllaDB vs Fal AI
- ScyllaDB vs Jupyter
- ScyllaDB vs Keras
- ScyllaDB vs LangChain
- ScyllaDB vs Weights & Biases
- ScyllaDB vs Alteryx
- ScyllaDB vs Anaconda
- ScyllaDB vs Domino Data Lab
- ScyllaDB vs DVC
- ScyllaDB vs Semantic Kernel
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
