Cloud · head to head
Neon vs ScyllaDB

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Neon compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Neon and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Neon
- Serverless PostgreSQL
- Database Branching
- Autoscaling
- Bottomless Storage
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Connection Pooling
- Read Replicas
- Instant Cloning
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Neon
- Serverless applicationsnot ScyllaDB
- Development databasesnot ScyllaDB
- Preview environmentsnot ScyllaDB
- Testingnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Neon
- Content managementnot Neon
- User profilesnot Neon
- Mobile backendsnot Neon
- Cachingnot Neon
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Neon
- Compute pricing at $0.106-$0.222/CU-hour means costs scale directly with workload, unlike fixed-price alternatives
- Separation of compute and storage may add complexity to cost prediction compared to all-in-one plans
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Neon
Free- FreeFree
- 100 CU-hours/month
- 0.5 GB storage
- 1 project
- Launch$15/month
- Pay-as-you-go compute
- $0.35/GB storage
- Multiple projects
- Scale$31/month
- Higher compute rates
- 99.95% SLA
- HIPAA compliance
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Neon if
- You need serverless postgresql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud.
- You also want database branching.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Neon or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Neon starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Neon or ScyllaDB?
- Neon starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Neon or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Neon runs on Cloud. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Neon for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Neon best used for?
- Neon is most often used for serverless applications, development databases, preview environments, testing. Of those, serverless applications and development databases are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Neon do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Neon covers Serverless PostgreSQL, Database Branching, Autoscaling, Bottomless Storage. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Neon: What is Neon and what makes it different?
Neon is a serverless PostgreSQL database that separates compute and storage, enabling automatic scaling and instant database branching. After acquisition by Databricks in May 2025, pricing has been significantly reduced.
SourceScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceNeon: Does Neon offer a free tier?
Yes, Neon's free tier includes 100 compute units per month and 0.5 GB of storage. This is suitable for development and small projects.
SourceScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceNeon: What are the paid plans and pricing for Neon?
Neon offers consumption-based pricing on Launch ($0.106/CU-hour, approximately $15/month) and Scale ($0.222/CU-hour, approximately $31/month) plans with separate storage billing at $0.35/GB-month. No monthly minimum required.
SourceScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceNeon: What features does Neon provide?
Neon includes git-like branching for database copies, point-in-time recovery, data anonymization for testing, managed authentication, serverless functions, and object storage that branches with projects.
SourceScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceNeon: What compliance and reliability guarantees does Neon provide?
Neon's Scale tier offers 99.95% uptime SLA, HIPAA compliance, SOC2 certification, and private networking via PrivateLink at no extra cost.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Neon vs Upstash
- Neon vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Neon vs DigitalOcean
- Neon vs Render
- Neon vs Oracle Cloud
- Neon vs Fly.io
- Neon vs Railway
- Neon vs Scaleway
- Neon vs Proxmox VE
- Neon vs Vultr
- Neon vs Tencent Cloud
- Neon vs Lambda
- Neon vs Linode
- Neon vs Longhorn
- Neon vs Northflank
- Neon vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Neon vs minikube
- Neon vs OpenTelemetry
- Neon vs Amazon Aurora
- Neon vs Airtable
- Neon vs Cockroach Labs
- Neon vs PostgreSQL
- Neon vs Cassandra
- Neon vs Couchbase
- Neon vs DataStax
- Neon vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neon vs RavenDB
- Neon vs DataGrip
- Neon vs turbopuffer
- Neon vs VerneMQ
- Neon vs Vespa
- Neon vs Xata
- Neon vs YugabyteDB
- Neon vs Zilliz
- Neon vs DynamoDB
- Neon vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Upstash
- ScyllaDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- ScyllaDB vs DigitalOcean
- ScyllaDB vs Render
- ScyllaDB vs Oracle Cloud
- ScyllaDB vs Fly.io
- ScyllaDB vs Railway
- ScyllaDB vs Scaleway
- ScyllaDB vs Proxmox VE
- ScyllaDB vs Vultr
- ScyllaDB vs Tencent Cloud
- ScyllaDB vs Lambda
- ScyllaDB vs Linode
- ScyllaDB vs Longhorn
- ScyllaDB vs Northflank
- ScyllaDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- ScyllaDB vs minikube
- ScyllaDB vs OpenTelemetry
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB

