Databases · head to head
Canary Labs vs ScyllaDB

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ScyllaDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Canary Labs and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Canary Labs | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per tag band per year | usage-based |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot ScyllaDB
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot ScyllaDB
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot ScyllaDB
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Canary Labs
- Content managementnot Canary Labs
- User profilesnot Canary Labs
- Mobile backendsnot Canary Labs
- Cachingnot Canary Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Canary Labs or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Canary Labs or ScyllaDB?
- ScyllaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3000/year for Canary Labs and Free for ScyllaDB.
- Does Canary Labs or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use ScyllaDB for free?
- Yes. ScyllaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year.
- What is Canary Labs best used for?
- Canary Labs is most often used for a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement, a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement, an ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboards, a plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an audit. Of those, a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement and a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Canary Labs do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceCanary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
ScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceCanary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
ScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceCanary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
ScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Canary Labs vs Airtable
- Canary Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Canary Labs vs Cassandra
- Canary Labs vs Couchbase
- Canary Labs vs RavenDB
- Canary Labs vs DataGrip
- Canary Labs vs turbopuffer
- Canary Labs vs Vespa
- Canary Labs vs Xata
- Canary Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Canary Labs vs Zilliz
- Canary Labs vs DynamoDB
- Canary Labs vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs EMQX
- ScyllaDB vs TimescaleDB
- ScyllaDB vs QuestDB
- ScyllaDB vs Solace PubSub+
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs Apache Doris
- ScyllaDB vs Convex
- ScyllaDB vs Instaclustr
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs Meilisearch
- ScyllaDB vs DuckDB
- ScyllaDB vs BigQuery
- ScyllaDB vs CosmosDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs dbt
- ScyllaDB vs FaunaDB
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
