Databases · head to head
Dremio vs ScyllaDB

Dremio
Databases
SQL query engine and lakehouse layer over Iceberg tables in object storage
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dremio reflections consume compute and storage to build and refresh continuously, so a team that enables them widely discovers that background maintenance rather than user queries drives the DCU bill.; ScyllaDB enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- They diverge on capability: Dremio covers Arrow-based execution, ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dremio and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dremio
- Arrow-based execution
- Reflections
- Semantic layer
- Iceberg catalogue
- Federated queries
- Autonomous management
- Fine-grained access control
- BI connectors
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dremio
- A company with petabytes of Parquet in S3 that wants BI dashboards without duplicating it into a warehousenot ScyllaDB
- A data platform team standardising on Apache Iceberg and needing a SQL engine plus catalogue that does not lock the tables innot ScyllaDB
- An analytics group accelerating slow lake queries with Reflections instead of hand-built aggregate tablesnot ScyllaDB
- A regulated enterprise that must keep data on premises but wants a modern lakehouse SQL layernot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Dremio
- Content managementnot Dremio
- User profilesnot Dremio
- Mobile backendsnot Dremio
- Cachingnot Dremio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dremio
- Reflections consume compute and storage to build and refresh continuously, so a team that enables them widely discovers that background maintenance rather than user queries drives the DCU bill.
- Self-managing Dremio on Kubernetes requires real platform engineering capacity for tuning executors, memory and coordinator sizing, and it is not comparable in effort to running a managed warehouse.
- The Community Edition lacks the security and governance features most enterprises require, so the free tier is a trial path rather than a viable production option for regulated buyers.
- Dremio Cloud is AWS-first, which leaves Azure and Google Cloud customers on the self-managed path with the operational burden that entails.
- Query performance without Reflections on raw, poorly laid out files is often unremarkable, so the promise of querying the lake as is depends on file layout work you still have to do.
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Dremio
Free- Community EditionFree
- Self-managed on your own hardware
- SQL engine and semantic layer
- No vendor support
- Dremio Cloud$0.2/hour
- Billed at $0.20 per Dremio Compute Unit
- Includes query execution, Reflections and background processing
- 400 dollar trial credit for 30 days
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Self-managed on Kubernetes, on premises or any cloud
- Enterprise security, SSO and governance
- Vendor support with SLA
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud Standard$null/variable
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud Professional$null/variable
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud Premium$null/variable
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Enterprise$null/quote
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Dremio if
- You need arrow-based execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Cloud, Docker.
- You also want reflections.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Dremio or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dremio starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dremio or ScyllaDB?
- Dremio starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Dremio or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Dremio runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Cloud, Docker. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Dremio for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dremio best used for?
- Dremio is most often used for a company with petabytes of parquet in s3 that wants bi dashboards without duplicating it into a warehouse, a data platform team standardising on apache iceberg and needing a sql engine plus catalogue that does not lock the tables in, an analytics group accelerating slow lake queries with reflections instead of hand-built aggregate tables, a regulated enterprise that must keep data on premises but wants a modern lakehouse sql layer. Of those, a company with petabytes of parquet in s3 that wants bi dashboards without duplicating it into a warehouse and a data platform team standardising on apache iceberg and needing a sql engine plus catalogue that does not lock the tables in are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Dremio do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Dremio covers Arrow-based execution, Reflections, Semantic layer, Iceberg catalogue. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dremio: How is Dremio Cloud billed?
At 0.20 US dollars per Dremio Compute Unit, which counts query execution, Reflection building and platform overhead, not just user queries.
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceDremio: Is there a free version?
Yes, a Community Edition you self-manage, but it omits the enterprise security and governance features and comes with no support.
ScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceDremio: Does it lock in my data?
No, tables stay in Apache Iceberg or Parquet in your own object storage and can be read by Spark, Trino or other engines.
ScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceDremio: Do I still need a warehouse?
Often not for analytics, but Dremio is not a transactional store and high-concurrency operational serving is not its strength.
ScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Dremio vs Presto
- Dremio vs StarRocks
- Dremio vs DuckDB
- Dremio vs BigQuery
- Dremio vs turbopuffer
- Dremio vs Amazon Redshift
- Dremio vs Knack
- Dremio vs LanceDB
- Dremio vs Meilisearch
- Dremio vs Turso
- Dremio vs Firebolt
- Dremio vs MotherDuck
- Dremio vs Privacera
- Dremio vs RavenDB
- Dremio vs Readyset
- Dremio vs Redpanda
- Dremio vs RisingWave
- Dremio vs Amazon Aurora
- Dremio vs Airtable
- Dremio vs Cockroach Labs
- Dremio vs PostgreSQL
- Dremio vs Cassandra
- Dremio vs Couchbase
- Dremio vs DataStax
- Dremio vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dremio vs DataGrip
- Dremio vs VerneMQ
- Dremio vs Vespa
- Dremio vs Xata
- Dremio vs YugabyteDB
- Dremio vs Zilliz
- Dremio vs DynamoDB
- Dremio vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Presto
- ScyllaDB vs StarRocks
- ScyllaDB vs DuckDB
- ScyllaDB vs BigQuery
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- ScyllaDB vs Knack
- ScyllaDB vs LanceDB
- ScyllaDB vs Meilisearch
- ScyllaDB vs Turso
- ScyllaDB vs Firebolt
- ScyllaDB vs MotherDuck
- ScyllaDB vs Privacera
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs Readyset
- ScyllaDB vs Redpanda
- ScyllaDB vs RisingWave
- ScyllaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ScyllaDB vs Airtable
- ScyllaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ScyllaDB vs PostgreSQL
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
