Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Neo4j

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Neo4j is a native graph database.
- Free plans on both; paid from $20/mo and $65/mo.
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) lists ephemeral environments; only Neo4j lists native Graph Storage.
- Where Neo4j falls short: AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and Neo4j actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | Neo4j |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | Freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS | Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Ona (formerly Gitpod).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in Neo4j
- Native Graph Storage
- Cypher Query Language
- ACID Transactions
- High Availability
- Graph Data Science
- Full-text Search
- Native Indexes
- GraphQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot Neo4j
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot Neo4j
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot Neo4j
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot Neo4j
Neo4j
- Graph database for learning and explorationnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Production workloads requiring high availability and multi-zone redundancynot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Enterprise deployments needing custom infrastructurenot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only
Neo4j
- AuraDB Free has no service availability SLA, no backups and no point-in-time recovery
- AuraDB Free imposes limits on node and relationship counts and runs single-zone only
- SSO authentication and role-based access control are excluded from AuraDB Free and AuraDB Professional, starting only at Business Critical at $146 per GB per month with a 2GB minimum cluster
- AuraDB Professional starts at $65 per GB per month with a minimum 1GB cluster and caps at 128GB memory per instance
- AuraDB Professional backups are daily with only 7-day retention, against 30 days on Business Critical
- Customer managed keys and private endpoints are available only on AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud, which is quote only with no published price
- Change data capture, query log forwarding, secondaries and access to Neo4j Professional Services are excluded below the Business Critical tier
- Support on AuraDB Free is community only and AuraDB Professional is best effort, with 24x7 one-hour response starting at Business Critical
- AuraDB Virtual Dedicated Cloud is sold on prepaid contract terms with enterprise commercial negotiation rather than self-serve card payment
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/mo
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- EnterpriseOn request
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
Neo4j
Free- FreeFree
- Learning and exploration access
- No credit card required
- All graph tools included
- AuraDB Professional$65/gb/month
- 1GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.09/hour for 1GB)
- Daily backups with 7-day retention
- AuraDB Business Critical$146/gb/month
- 2GB minimum cluster
- Hourly billing available ($0.40/hour for 2GB)
- Up to 512GB maximum
- Virtual Dedicated CloudOn request
- Custom pricing via sales contact
- Dedicated VPC infrastructure
- Hourly backups with 60-day retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose Neo4j if
- You need native graph storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want cypher query language.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Neo4j better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Neo4j at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Neo4j?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and Neo4j at Free.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or Neo4j run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS. Neo4j runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what Neo4j is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that Neo4j cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. Neo4j covers Native Graph Storage, Cypher Query Language, ACID Transactions, High Availability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
Neo4j: Is Neo4j free?
Neo4j offers a free tier (AuraDB Free) for learning and exploration with no credit card required. Community Edition is also free and GPL3-licensed. Paid tiers start at $65/GB per month for AuraDB Professional.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
Neo4j: What does Neo4j's Professional tier include?
AuraDB Professional costs $65/GB per month with a 1GB minimum cluster, includes daily backups with 7-day retention, single-zone availability, and best-effort support. Hourly billing is available at $0.09/hour per GB.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
Neo4j: What is Neo4j's most advanced pricing tier?
AuraDB Business Critical costs $146/GB per month with a 2GB minimum and includes multi-zone redundancy, 99.95% uptime SLA, 24/7 premium support with one-hour response times, and point-in-time recovery.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
Related pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Envoy
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Rust
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Steampipe
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Tilt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vim
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs WarpBuild
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Webpack
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Elasticsearch
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ArangoDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Dgraph
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DynamoDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Couchbase
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cassandra
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DataGrip
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs MongoDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs RavenDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ScyllaDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vitess
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Aiven
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs BigQuery
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CosmosDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DataStax
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs dbt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CouchDB
- Neo4j vs Coder
- Neo4j vs CodeSandbox
- Neo4j vs StackBlitz
- Neo4j vs Namespace
- Neo4j vs Daytona
- Neo4j vs Earthly
- Neo4j vs Envoy
- Neo4j vs Nixpacks
- Neo4j vs Spacelift
- Neo4j vs Atlantis
- Neo4j vs Backstage
- Neo4j vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Neo4j vs Rust
- Neo4j vs Steampipe
- Neo4j vs Tilt
- Neo4j vs Vim
- Neo4j vs WarpBuild
- Neo4j vs Webpack
- Neo4j vs Elasticsearch
- Neo4j vs ArangoDB
- Neo4j vs Dgraph
- Neo4j vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Neo4j vs DynamoDB
- Neo4j vs Couchbase
- Neo4j vs Cassandra
- Neo4j vs DataGrip
- Neo4j vs MongoDB
- Neo4j vs RavenDB
- Neo4j vs ScyllaDB
- Neo4j vs Vitess
- Neo4j vs Aiven
- Neo4j vs BigQuery
- Neo4j vs CosmosDB
- Neo4j vs DataStax
- Neo4j vs dbt
- Neo4j vs CouchDB

