Developer Tools · head to head
Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs ScyllaDB

Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Developer Tools
Cloud development environments repositioned as a control plane for software engineering agents
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

ScyllaDB
Databases
The real-time big data database compatible with Cassandra
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- ScyllaDB is a high-performance NoSQL database compatible.
- ScyllaDB is free; Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at $20/mo.
- Only Ona (formerly Gitpod) lists ephemeral environments; only ScyllaDB lists cassandra Compatible.
- Where ScyllaDB falls short: enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ona (formerly Gitpod) and ScyllaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ona (formerly Gitpod) | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month by compute unit | Usage-based |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS | Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Databases |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Ona (formerly Gitpod).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Ephemeral environments
- Agent sessions
- Bring your own cloud
- Devcontainer standard
- Compute unit budgeting
- Enterprise identity
Only in ScyllaDB
- Cassandra Compatible
- DynamoDB Compatible
- 10x Throughput
- Low Latency
- Auto-tuning
- Lightweight Transactions
- Change Data Capture
- Cassandra Drivers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setupnot ScyllaDB
- Running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptopnot ScyllaDB
- Keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled accountnot ScyllaDB
- Reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machinenot ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB
- Real-time applicationsnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Content managementnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- User profilesnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Mobile backendsnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Cachingnot Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Acquisition risk has already materialised: the company closed a sale to OpenAI on 10 August 2026 and now sits inside the Codex team, so nothing public guarantees pricing, continuity or neutrality between model vendors beyond honouring existing commitments
- Two disruptive changes of direction inside a year, from development environments to agent orchestration and then from independence to acquisition, mean the product a browser IDE buyer originally chose no longer exists in that form
- The Gitpod Classic sunset on 15 October 2025 required manual conversion of configuration, hand-moved secrets, self-rescued workspace data and a brand new account, which is the clearest available precedent for how the vendor handles deprecation
- Community self-hosting is finished: the AGPL-3.0 repository is deprecated by its own README, and self-hosted now means a vendor-operated install in your AWS or GCP account, with no Azure, no on-premises and no air-gapped path
- Pricing is difficult to model because it runs on a compute unit currency where subscription credits expire at the end of the month, the mapping from units to actual compute is not published on the pricing page, and Enterprise is quotation only
ScyllaDB
- Enterprise tier requires custom quote from sales
- Pricing varies by cloud provider, storage, and instance configuration
- Contracts available but commitment required for subscription discounts
Pricing, plan by plan
Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 parallel environments
- Machines up to 4 vCPU, 16 GB memory and 80 GB disk
- Ona Cloud multi-tenant only
- Core$20/mo
- From 20 US dollars a month, up to 100 team members
- Includes 80 to 2,200 recurring compute units a month depending on tier
- Additional units from 10 US dollars per 40 units
- EnterpriseOn request
- Single-tenant deployment in your own AWS or GCP account
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on
- Dedicated account management and forward deployed engineers
ScyllaDB
Free- ScyllaDB Cloud StandardOn request
- Usage-based billing: vCPU, RAM, NVMe SSD storage
- 2-hour P1 support response time
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB Cloud ProfessionalOn request
- Enterprise-grade scalability
- 1-hour P1 support response
- Enhanced features included
- ScyllaDB Cloud PremiumOn request
- Custom security and networking
- 15-minute P1 support response
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- ScyllaDB EnterpriseOn request
- Self-managed deployment
- On-premise or private cloud
- Custom quote required
Which should you pick?
Choose Ona (formerly Gitpod) if
- You need ephemeral environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS.
- You also want agent sessions.
Choose ScyllaDB if
- You need cassandra compatible.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- You also want dynamodb compatible.
Questions people ask
- Is Ona (formerly Gitpod) or ScyllaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ona (formerly Gitpod) or ScyllaDB?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) starts at Free and ScyllaDB at Free.
- Does Ona (formerly Gitpod) or ScyllaDB run on more platforms?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows, AWS. ScyllaDB runs on Linux, Self-hosted, Web.
- Can I use Ona (formerly Gitpod) for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ona (formerly Gitpod) best used for?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) is most often used for giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup, running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop, keeping source code off contractor and offshore laptops by moving the whole environment into a controlled account, reproducing a hard-to-configure toolchain for a short-lived project without polluting anyone machine. Of those, giving a large engineering team identical, disposable environments so onboarding is a link rather than a two day setup and running several coding agents in parallel against real databases and services instead of on a laptop are not what ScyllaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Ona (formerly Gitpod) do that ScyllaDB cannot?
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) covers Ephemeral environments, Agent sessions, Bring your own cloud, Devcontainer standard. ScyllaDB covers Cassandra Compatible, DynamoDB Compatible, 10x Throughput, Low Latency.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ona (formerly Gitpod): Is Gitpod still called Gitpod?
No. It rebranded to Ona in September 2025, and gitpod.io now redirects to ona.com. The company was acquired by OpenAI in a deal that closed on 10 August 2026.
ScyllaDB: How is ScyllaDB Cloud pricing calculated?
ScyllaDB Cloud uses transparent, resource-based billing based on instance type (vCPU and RAM), NVMe SSD storage, service plan tier, deployment model, and cloud provider costs.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): Can I still self-host it for free?
No. The AGPL-3.0 self-hosted project is deprecated by its own README. What is offered now is a vendor-operated single-tenant install in your AWS or GCP account on the Enterprise plan.
ScyllaDB: Does ScyllaDB offer a free trial?
ScyllaDB offers a 30-day developer trial on smaller instances and a 48-hour production evaluation trial with full-grade instances.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): What happened to Gitpod Classic?
Pay-as-you-go Classic was switched off on 15 October 2025. Migration required converting gitpod.yml to devcontainer.json, moving secrets by hand, downloading workspace data before the cutoff and creating a new account.
ScyllaDB: What cost savings are available for long-term ScyllaDB commitments?
ScyllaDB subscription contracts provide up to 70% or more in savings compared to on-demand hourly billing. 1-year and 3-year contract options are available.
SourceOna (formerly Gitpod): What does it cost?
Core starts at 20 US dollars a month and includes a monthly allowance of Ona Compute Units, with more from 10 dollars per 40 units. Subscription credits expire monthly. Enterprise is quoted.
ScyllaDB: How much cheaper is ScyllaDB than DynamoDB?
Unlike DynamoDB which charges per read/write unit, ScyllaDB charges based on resource usage only, potentially delivering 50% or greater cost reduction for high-throughput workloads.
SourceRelated pages
More on Ona (formerly Gitpod)
Other head to heads
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Coder
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CodeSandbox
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs StackBlitz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Namespace
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Daytona
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Earthly
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Envoy
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Nixpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Spacelift
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Atlantis
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Backstage
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Rust
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Steampipe
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Tilt
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vim
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs WarpBuild
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Webpack
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Cassandra
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs MongoDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Couchbase
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DataStax
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DynamoDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs RavenDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs DataGrip
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Dgraph
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Instaclustr
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Elasticsearch
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs turbopuffer
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs VerneMQ
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Vespa
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Xata
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs YugabyteDB
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs Zilliz
- Ona (formerly Gitpod) vs CouchDB
- ScyllaDB vs Coder
- ScyllaDB vs CodeSandbox
- ScyllaDB vs StackBlitz
- ScyllaDB vs Namespace
- ScyllaDB vs Daytona
- ScyllaDB vs Earthly
- ScyllaDB vs Envoy
- ScyllaDB vs Nixpacks
- ScyllaDB vs Spacelift
- ScyllaDB vs Atlantis
- ScyllaDB vs Backstage
- ScyllaDB vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- ScyllaDB vs Rust
- ScyllaDB vs Steampipe
- ScyllaDB vs Tilt
- ScyllaDB vs Vim
- ScyllaDB vs WarpBuild
- ScyllaDB vs Webpack
- ScyllaDB vs Cassandra
- ScyllaDB vs MongoDB
- ScyllaDB vs Couchbase
- ScyllaDB vs DataStax
- ScyllaDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB
- ScyllaDB vs RavenDB
- ScyllaDB vs DataGrip
- ScyllaDB vs Dgraph
- ScyllaDB vs Instaclustr
- ScyllaDB vs Elasticsearch
- ScyllaDB vs turbopuffer
- ScyllaDB vs VerneMQ
- ScyllaDB vs Vespa
- ScyllaDB vs Xata
- ScyllaDB vs YugabyteDB
- ScyllaDB vs Zilliz
- ScyllaDB vs CouchDB
