Marketing · head to head
Freshpaint vs Surfshark

Freshpaint
Marketing
Privacy layer that lets healthcare organisations run marketing analytics without sending PHI
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Freshpaint filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.; Surfshark smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- They diverge on capability: Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Surfshark covers Unlimited devices.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Freshpaint and Surfshark actually diverge.
| Attribute | Freshpaint | Surfshark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1.78/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux |
| Category | Marketing | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Freshpaint
- PHI detection and redaction
- Business associate agreement
- Event verification
- Pixel replacement
- Consent governance
- Advertising destinations
- Analytics and session tools
- Audience activation
Only in Surfshark
- Unlimited devices
- CleanWeb ad blocker
- MultiHop
- Camouflage Mode
- NoBorders mode
- Kill Switch
- Bypasser split tunneling
- Rotating IP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Freshpaint
- A health system told by legal to remove its Meta and Google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaignsnot Surfshark
- A provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewednot Surfshark
- A compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committeenot Surfshark
- A multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tagsnot Surfshark
Surfshark
- Vpnnot Freshpaint
- Privacynot Freshpaint
- Security Suitenot Freshpaint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Freshpaint
- Filtering necessarily degrades what advertising platforms receive, so campaign optimisation and lookalike modelling perform worse than an unfiltered pixel would, and the marketing team must accept measurably weaker targeting as the price of compliance.
- Pricing is not published on the vendor site despite three named tiers, and third party reports of entry around 599 US dollars a month cover only the lowest tier, with audiences and advertising activation sitting above it.
- It addresses web and marketing tracking rather than the whole protected health information estate, so it solves one exposure while patient data in the CRM, call centre and email tooling remains a separate problem.
- The commercial case rests on a specific regulatory interpretation of online tracking technologies, and litigation and future guidance could narrow or widen it, which makes the size of the problem it solves less stable than a compliance purchase usually is.
- It is built for healthcare and priced accordingly, so an organisation wanting a general customer data platform pays for a regulatory specialism it does not need and gets narrower general purpose functionality than Segment or RudderStack.
Surfshark
- Smaller server network (4,500+ servers) compared to larger competitors like NordVPN
- Lower brand recognition compared to established VPN providers
- Limited customer service availability in some time zones
Pricing, plan by plan
Freshpaint
On request- Comply$undefined/month
- Governance and consent foundation
- PHI detection and redaction
- Web analytics, funnels and surveys
- Perform$undefined/month
- Everything in Comply
- Audiences and demand side platform activation
- Attribution, journeys and recommendations
- Scale$undefined/month
- Everything in Perform
- Ad performance reporting
- Full AI feature access
Surfshark
$1.78/month- Starter$1.78/month
- Unlimited simultaneous connections
- 4,500+ servers
- Basic VPN
- One$3.59/month
- VPN
- Antivirus
- Personal data leak alert
- One+$4/month
- All One features
- Incogi included
Which should you pick?
Choose Freshpaint if
- You need phi detection and redaction.
- You also want business associate agreement.
Choose Surfshark if
- You need unlimited devices.
- You work on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- You also want cleanweb ad blocker.
Questions people ask
- Is Freshpaint or Surfshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Freshpaint starts at On request and Surfshark at $1.78/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Freshpaint or Surfshark?
- Freshpaint starts at On request and Surfshark at $1.78/month.
- Does Freshpaint or Surfshark run on more platforms?
- Freshpaint runs on Web. Surfshark runs on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Linux.
- What is Freshpaint best used for?
- Freshpaint is most often used for a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns, a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed, a compliance officer who needs a field level record of exactly what patient related data leaves the website, for a privacy committee, a multi-site provider group standardising tracking governance across marketing agencies that would otherwise each add their own tags. Of those, a health system told by legal to remove its meta and google pixels that still needs to report cost per acquisition on service line campaigns and a provider running paid search for elective procedures that must send conversion signals without disclosing which condition page a visitor viewed are not what Surfshark is typically brought in for.
- What can Freshpaint do that Surfshark cannot?
- Freshpaint covers PHI detection and redaction, Business associate agreement, Event verification, Pixel replacement. Surfshark covers Unlimited devices, CleanWeb ad blocker, MultiHop, Camouflage Mode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Freshpaint: Why can a hospital not just use Google Analytics?
US Department of Health and Human Services guidance treats IP addresses and health related page URLs as protected health information in this context, and advertising and analytics platforms will not sign a business associate agreement, so the disclosure is unlawful without an intermediary that filters.
Surfshark: Does Surfshark maintain a no-logs policy?
Yes. Surfshark does not log browsing history, visited IP addresses, bandwidth usage, or network traffic. This policy was independently verified by Deloitte in 2025.
SourceFreshpaint: Does Freshpaint sign a BAA?
Yes, and it holds SOC 2 Type II. That is the central reason it exists, because the destination platforms will not.
Surfshark: How many simultaneous device connections does Surfshark allow?
Surfshark allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all subscription plans, enabling protection of every device in a household with a single subscription.
SourceFreshpaint: What does it cost?
Freshpaint does not publish prices. Three tiers, Comply, Perform and Scale, are all sales led, and third party sources report entry around 599 US dollars a month for the lowest.
Freshpaint: Will my ad performance suffer?
Somewhat. Stripping identifiers reduces what platforms can optimise against. The trade is weaker targeting in exchange for measurement that a compliance committee will approve.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Freshpaint vs Fathom Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Simple Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Google Analytics
- Freshpaint vs Umami
- Freshpaint vs Attribution
- Freshpaint vs Matomo
- Freshpaint vs Plausible
- Freshpaint vs Bloomreach
- Freshpaint vs Insider
- Freshpaint vs Invoca
- Freshpaint vs Madgicx
- Freshpaint vs Mautic
- Freshpaint vs Whatagraph
- Freshpaint vs MoEngage
- Freshpaint vs Optimizely
- Freshpaint vs Vimeo
- Freshpaint vs Countly
- Freshpaint vs CyberGhost VPN
- Freshpaint vs ProtonVPN
- Freshpaint vs NordVPN
- Freshpaint vs Avast One
- Freshpaint vs McAfee Total Protection
- Freshpaint vs Norton 360
- Freshpaint vs IVPN
- Freshpaint vs Mullvad VPN
- Freshpaint vs Windscribe
- Freshpaint vs TunnelBear
- Freshpaint vs Private Internet Access
- Freshpaint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Freshpaint vs iDenfy
- Freshpaint vs IDnow
- Freshpaint vs Jumio
- Freshpaint vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Freshpaint vs LogicManager
- Freshpaint vs ExpressVPN
- Surfshark vs Fathom Analytics
- Surfshark vs Simple Analytics
- Surfshark vs Google Analytics
- Surfshark vs Umami
- Surfshark vs Attribution
- Surfshark vs Matomo
- Surfshark vs Plausible
- Surfshark vs Bloomreach
- Surfshark vs Insider
- Surfshark vs Invoca
- Surfshark vs Madgicx
- Surfshark vs Mautic
- Surfshark vs Whatagraph
- Surfshark vs MoEngage
- Surfshark vs Optimizely
- Surfshark vs Vimeo
- Surfshark vs Countly
- Surfshark vs CyberGhost VPN
- Surfshark vs ProtonVPN
- Surfshark vs NordVPN
- Surfshark vs Avast One
- Surfshark vs McAfee Total Protection
- Surfshark vs Norton 360
- Surfshark vs IVPN
- Surfshark vs Mullvad VPN
- Surfshark vs Windscribe
- Surfshark vs TunnelBear
- Surfshark vs Private Internet Access
- Surfshark vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Surfshark vs iDenfy
- Surfshark vs IDnow
- Surfshark vs Jumio
- Surfshark vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Surfshark vs LogicManager
- Surfshark vs ExpressVPN

