Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs Helicone

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
Helicone
AI
Open-source LLM observability and gateway platform for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Helicone the free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and Helicone actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in Helicone
- Request dashboard and tracking
- Sessions and segments
- Helicone Query Language (HQL)
- Prompt datasets and improvement
- Playground
- Rate limits and alerts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Helicone
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Helicone
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Helicone
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Helicone
Helicone
- Monitoring cost and latency of production LLM applicationsnot Flowable
- Debugging multi-step agent sessionsnot Flowable
- Managing and iterating on prompts across a teamnot Flowable
- Routing requests across multiple LLM providersnot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
Helicone
- The free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- Advanced compliance features like SOC 2 and HIPAA are only available starting at the $799/month Team plan.
- Usage beyond the free tier is billed on top of the base subscription, adding cost unpredictability at scale.
- On-premises deployment is restricted to the custom Enterprise tier.
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
Helicone
Free- HobbyFree
- 10,000 free requests
- 1 GB storage
- 1 seat
- Pro$79/month
- 10K free requests included, usage-based beyond
- 7-day free trial
- Unlimited playgrounds and workspaces
- Team$799/month
- 5 organizations
- SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
- Dedicated Slack channel access
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom MSAs and SAML SSO
- On-premises deployment
- Bulk cloud discounts
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose Helicone if
- You need request dashboard and tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want sessions and segments.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or Helicone better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Helicone at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or Helicone?
- Flowable starts at Free and Helicone at Free.
- Does Flowable or Helicone run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Helicone runs on web, api.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Helicone is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that Helicone cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Sessions and segments, Helicone Query Language (HQL), Prompt datasets and improvement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
Helicone: What does Helicone cost?
Helicone offers a free Hobby plan, a Pro plan at $79/month, a Team plan at $799/month, and custom Enterprise pricing, with usage-based charges applying beyond included request limits.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
Helicone: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan includes 10,000 requests per month, 1 GB of storage, 1 seat, and 1 organization, aimed at kickstarting AI projects.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
Helicone: Are there discounts available?
Helicone offers 50% off the first year for qualifying startups, discounts for non-profits, a $100 annual credit for open-source projects, and free access for students.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs PromptLayer
- Flowable vs Arize AI
- Flowable vs Galileo
- Flowable vs Together AI
- Flowable vs Stable Diffusion
- Flowable vs AutoGen
- Flowable vs LangGraph
- Flowable vs Aider
- Flowable vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Flowable vs Tabnine
- Flowable vs Amazon Q Developer
- Flowable vs Replicate
- Flowable vs Gumloop
- Flowable vs Inflection AI
- Flowable vs LatchBio
- Flowable vs LOVO
- Flowable vs Manus
- Flowable vs Modal
- Helicone vs Temporal
- Helicone vs Nintex
- Helicone vs jBPM
- Helicone vs Activiti
- Helicone vs Camunda
- Helicone vs Kogito
- Helicone vs Airbyte
- Helicone vs Nango
- Helicone vs Windmill
- Helicone vs Hatchet
- Helicone vs Meltano
- Helicone vs RudderStack
- Helicone vs HighLevel
- Helicone vs Grouparoo
- Helicone vs Hevo Data
- Helicone vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Helicone vs IBM MQ
- Helicone vs PromptLayer
- Helicone vs Arize AI
- Helicone vs Galileo
- Helicone vs Together AI
- Helicone vs Stable Diffusion
- Helicone vs AutoGen
- Helicone vs LangGraph
- Helicone vs Aider
- Helicone vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Helicone vs Tabnine
- Helicone vs Amazon Q Developer
- Helicone vs Replicate
- Helicone vs Gumloop
- Helicone vs Inflection AI
- Helicone vs LatchBio
- Helicone vs LOVO
- Helicone vs Manus
- Helicone vs Modal
