Automation Integration · head to head
Flowable vs Together AI

Flowable
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Together AI free tier limits not clearly specified in pricing documentation
- They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Together AI covers Open-source models.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flowable and Together AI actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flowable | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | usage-based |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud | Api, Cloud |
| Category | Automation Integration | AI |
| Founded | Unknown | 2022 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flowable
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- CMMN case management
- DMN decision tables
- Spring Boot integration
- Modelling studio
- Task and case application
- REST APIs
- History and audit
Only in Together AI
- Open-source models
- Fine-tuning
- Fast inference
- Embeddings
- REST API
- Python SDK
- OpenAI compatible
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flowable
- An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Together AI
- A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Together AI
- A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Together AI
- A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Together AI
Together AI
- LLM inference for production AI applicationsnot Flowable
- Content generation at scalenot Flowable
- Code execution and embeddingsnot Flowable
- Model fine-tuning and trainingnot Flowable
- Startup and enterprise AI deploymentnot Flowable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flowable
- The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
- It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
- The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
- Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.
Together AI
- Free tier limits not clearly specified in pricing documentation
- Pricing varies significantly by model and use case
- Requires account setup for production access
- Batch API discounts apply only to non-urgent workloads
Pricing, plan by plan
Flowable
Free- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
- Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
- No modelling studio or enterprise applications
- Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
- Modelling studio, work application and admin console
- Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
- Support with SLA and version maintenance
Together AI
Free- Serverless Inference$0.03/1M input tokens
- Chat and Vision models
- Image generation
- Video generation
- Provisioned Throughput$21600/month
- Up to 83% savings vs commercial alternatives
- Reserved capacity
- Guaranteed throughput
- Dedicated Inference$5.49/hour
- H100 GPU instance
- Single-tenant deployment
- No resource sharing
- GPU Clusters$3.99/GPU-hour
- On-demand capacity
- Volume discounts available
- Reserved options with up to 35% savings
Which should you pick?
Choose Flowable if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want cmmn case management.
Choose Together AI if
- You need open-source models.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Api, Cloud.
- You also want fine-tuning.
Questions people ask
- Is Flowable or Together AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Together AI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flowable or Together AI?
- Flowable starts at Free and Together AI at Free.
- Does Flowable or Together AI run on more platforms?
- Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Together AI runs on Api, Cloud.
- Can I use Flowable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Flowable best used for?
- Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Together AI is typically brought in for.
- What can Flowable do that Together AI cannot?
- Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Together AI covers Open-source models, Fine-tuning, Fast inference, Embeddings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flowable: Is Flowable open source?
Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.
Together AI: Does Together AI offer a free tier?
Yes, Together AI advertises 'Start for free, scale on demand,' but specific free tier usage limits are not detailed on the pricing page.
SourceFlowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?
The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.
Together AI: What are Together AI's highest model prices?
Serverless inference pricing ranges from free for base models up to $4.40 per 1M input tokens for premium models. Video generation costs $0.14 to $3.20 per video depending on resolution.
SourceFlowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.
Together AI: How much can I save with Provisioned Throughput?
Together AI offers up to 83% savings compared to commercial alternatives when using their Provisioned Throughput option with reserved capacity.
SourceFlowable: Why choose it over Camunda?
CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.
Together AI: What is Together AI's fine-tuning pricing?
Standard fine-tuning costs $0.48 to $2.90 per 1M tokens depending on model size, with a minimum charge of $4.00 per job.
SourceRelated pages
More on Together AI
Other head to heads
- Flowable vs Temporal
- Flowable vs Nintex
- Flowable vs jBPM
- Flowable vs Activiti
- Flowable vs Camunda
- Flowable vs Kogito
- Flowable vs Airbyte
- Flowable vs Nango
- Flowable vs Windmill
- Flowable vs Hatchet
- Flowable vs Meltano
- Flowable vs RudderStack
- Flowable vs HighLevel
- Flowable vs Grouparoo
- Flowable vs Hevo Data
- Flowable vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Flowable vs IBM MQ
- Flowable vs Anthropic API
- Flowable vs Fathom
- Flowable vs Pika
- Flowable vs D-ID
- Flowable vs Aider
- Flowable vs Stable Diffusion
- Flowable vs Replicate
- Flowable vs LangGraph
- Flowable vs AutoGen
- Flowable vs Helicone
- Flowable vs AI21 Labs
- Flowable vs Poolside
- Flowable vs Banana
- Flowable vs C3 AI Suite
- Flowable vs Character.AI
- Flowable vs Chatbase
- Flowable vs Copilotly
- Flowable vs Claude
- Together AI vs Temporal
- Together AI vs Nintex
- Together AI vs jBPM
- Together AI vs Activiti
- Together AI vs Camunda
- Together AI vs Kogito
- Together AI vs Airbyte
- Together AI vs Nango
- Together AI vs Windmill
- Together AI vs Hatchet
- Together AI vs Meltano
- Together AI vs RudderStack
- Together AI vs HighLevel
- Together AI vs Grouparoo
- Together AI vs Hevo Data
- Together AI vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Together AI vs IBM MQ
- Together AI vs Anthropic API
- Together AI vs Fathom
- Together AI vs Pika
- Together AI vs D-ID
- Together AI vs Aider
- Together AI vs Stable Diffusion
- Together AI vs Replicate
- Together AI vs LangGraph
- Together AI vs AutoGen
- Together AI vs Helicone
- Together AI vs AI21 Labs
- Together AI vs Poolside
- Together AI vs Banana
- Together AI vs C3 AI Suite
- Together AI vs Character.AI
- Together AI vs Chatbase
- Together AI vs Copilotly
- Together AI vs Claude

