Softwr

Automation Integration · head to head

Flowable vs Stable Diffusion

Flowable logo

Flowable

Automation Integration

Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

From
Free
Rated
-
Stable Diffusion logo

Stable Diffusion

AI

Open-source AI image generation

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Flowable the open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.; Stable Diffusion generated images have lower resolution and quality at non-standard dimensions
  • They diverge on capability: Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Stable Diffusion covers Text-to-image.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Flowable and Stable Diffusion actually diverge.

Attributes where Flowable and Stable Diffusion differ
AttributeFlowableStable Diffusion
Pricing modelquoteUnknown
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, CloudWeb, Local (GPU-based), Cloud APIs
CategoryAutomation IntegrationAI
FoundedUnknown2019

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Flowable

  • BPMN 2.0 engine
  • CMMN case management
  • DMN decision tables
  • Spring Boot integration
  • Modelling studio
  • Task and case application
  • REST APIs
  • History and audit

Only in Stable Diffusion

  • Text-to-image
  • Image-to-image
  • Inpainting
  • LoRA support
  • ComfyUI
  • Automatic1111
  • Multiple UIs
  • Local support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Flowable

  • An insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and BPMN alone cannot express itnot Stable Diffusion
  • A bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing Spring Boot estate rather than buying a separate platformnot Stable Diffusion
  • A team leaving Activiti or jBPM that wants the same API family with active commercial maintenancenot Stable Diffusion
  • A regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisorsnot Stable Diffusion

Stable Diffusion

  • ai tools managementnot Flowable
  • Workflow automationnot Flowable
  • Reportingnot Flowable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Flowable

  • The open source engine is genuinely usable but ships without the modelling studio, work application and admin console, so an open source deployment means building your own user interfaces before anyone can use it.
  • It expects Java engineering capacity; teams looking for a business-user low-code automation tool will find the modelling and deployment cycle far too technical.
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and is quoted per deployment, leaving buyers without a benchmark against Camunda or IBM alternatives.
  • The Activiti fork left three engines with related APIs and overlapping documentation in circulation, and search results routinely return advice for the wrong one.
  • Flowable AG is a small Swiss company relative to its competitors, so the partner network, training market and pool of engineers with production experience are all limited outside Europe.

Stable Diffusion

  • Generated images have lower resolution and quality at non-standard dimensions
  • Struggles with complex multi-object prompts and text generation
  • Poor rendering of human hands, limbs, and faces due to training data limitations
  • Trained primarily on English-language descriptions, reinforcing Western cultural bias
  • Requires significant GPU computational resources for local deployment

Pricing, plan by plan

Flowable

Free
  • Flowable Open SourceFree
    • Apache 2.0 licensed BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines
    • Embeddable Java library or standalone apps
    • No modelling studio or enterprise applications
  • Flowable Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Modelling studio, work application and admin console
    • Connectors, forms and advanced identity management
    • Support with SLA and version maintenance

Stable Diffusion

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Stable Diffusion review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Flowable if

  • You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
  • You also want cmmn case management.

Choose Stable Diffusion if

  • You need text-to-image.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Local (GPU-based), Cloud APIs.
  • You also want image-to-image.

Questions people ask

Is Flowable or Stable Diffusion better?
Neither clearly leads. Flowable starts at Free and Stable Diffusion at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Flowable or Stable Diffusion?
Flowable starts at Free and Stable Diffusion at Free.
Does Flowable or Stable Diffusion run on more platforms?
Flowable runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Stable Diffusion runs on Web, Local (GPU-based), Cloud APIs.
Can I use Flowable for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Flowable best used for?
Flowable is most often used for an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it, a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform, a team leaving activiti or jbpm that wants the same api family with active commercial maintenance, a regulated organisation needing complete process history and decision table audit trails for supervisors. Of those, an insurer automating claims handling where each case follows a different path and bpmn alone cannot express it and a bank embedding process orchestration inside an existing spring boot estate rather than buying a separate platform are not what Stable Diffusion is typically brought in for.
What can Flowable do that Stable Diffusion cannot?
Flowable covers BPMN 2.0 engine, CMMN case management, DMN decision tables, Spring Boot integration. Stable Diffusion covers Text-to-image, Image-to-image, Inpainting, LoRA support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Flowable: Is Flowable open source?

Yes, the BPMN, CMMN and DMN engines are Apache 2.0. The modelling studio and enterprise applications are commercial.

Stable Diffusion: Is Stable Diffusion truly free and open-source?

Yes. Stable Diffusion is released under the CreativeML Open RAIL-M license, allowing free use for both commercial and non-commercial purposes, and the code is open-source on GitHub.

Source
Flowable: How does it relate to Activiti and jBPM?

The same core developers built jBPM, then Activiti, then forked Activiti in 2016 to create Flowable.

Stable Diffusion: Can I use Stable Diffusion commercially for free?

Yes, if your organization has less than $1M annual revenue. Organizations exceeding $1M annually must obtain an Enterprise License from Stability AI.

Source
Flowable: What does Flowable Enterprise cost?

Nothing is published. It is quoted per deployment by the vendor.

Stable Diffusion: What are Stable Diffusion's image resolution limitations?

The base model was trained on 512x512 pixel images, and image quality degrades noticeably when deviating from this resolution. Newer models like SDXL support higher resolutions.

Source
Flowable: Why choose it over Camunda?

CMMN case management is a first-class engine, which matters when work is exception-driven rather than a fixed sequence.

Stable Diffusion: Can I run Stable Diffusion locally on my computer?

Yes. Stable Diffusion is open-source and can run locally on compatible hardware, though it requires a GPU for reasonable performance.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads