Manufacturing · head to head
Flow Software vs Ignition

Flow Software
Manufacturing
Manufacturing KPI and OEE calculation engine with published list prices, licensed by measure count
- From
- $11390/one-time
- Rated
- -

Ignition
Manufacturing
Industrial automation platform for SCADA, HMI and MES
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Flow Software the 11,390 dollar Starter licence caps at 250 measures and events, which a multi-line plant exhausts quickly once each line contributes a dozen calculations, forcing a jump to the 62,230 dollar tier.; Ignition requires real engineering to implement; it is a platform rather than a finished application
- They diverge on capability: Flow Software covers Calculation engine, Ignition covers Unlimited-client licensing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Flow Software and Ignition actually diverge.
| Attribute | Flow Software | Ignition |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11390/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Per-server licensing with published module pricing; unlimited clients and tags |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Windows, Linux, macOS, Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Flow Software
- Calculation engine
- Measure model
- Historian connectors
- Manual data entry
- Event framing
- Excel and Power BI output
- Flow dashboards
- AI Gateway
Only in Ignition
- Unlimited-client licensing
- SCADA and HMI
- Historian
- MES modules
- Web-based clients
- Wide PLC support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Flow Software
- A brewery replacing a fragile network of OEE spreadsheets with governed calculations from the same historian datanot Ignition
- Reporting specific energy consumption per tonne against an ISO 50001 audit where the calculation method must be documentednot Ignition
- Feeding Power BI plant dashboards from a historian without giving analysts direct tag-level accessnot Ignition
- A site that needs lab results typed in and combined with automated tag data in the same yield calculationnot Ignition
Ignition
- Plants where per-tag licensing has made expansion a budget conversationnot Flow Software
- Replacing installed operator terminals with browser-based clientsnot Flow Software
- Connecting plant floor data to SQL and business systemsnot Flow Software
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Flow Software
- The 11,390 dollar Starter licence caps at 250 measures and events, which a multi-line plant exhausts quickly once each line contributes a dozen calculations, forcing a jump to the 62,230 dollar tier.
- The Unlimited licence requires every engine on a single server or VM, so any multi-server or multi-site topology goes straight to Distributed at roughly double the price with no intermediate option.
- Maintenance renews at about fifteen percent of the installed base annually, so a large perpetual estate carries a five-figure recurring cost that the headline perpetual price hides.
- It is a Windows product with a Microsoft data stack, so Linux or container-native deployment strategies do not apply and the server has to be managed on the plant Windows estate.
- It calculates and reports but does not collect from equipment itself, so an existing historian or OPC layer is a prerequisite and Flow adds cost on top of that rather than replacing it.
Ignition
- Requires real engineering to implement; it is a platform rather than a finished application
- Steep learning curve, and Inductive Automation runs its own training programme because of it
- Self-hosted and self-supported by default, so plant IT carries the availability burden
- Module-based pricing means the entry figure is rarely the final one
Pricing, plan by plan
Flow Software
$11390/one-time- Starter$11390/one-time
- 250 KPI measures and events
- Single server deployment
- First year of software maintenance included
- Unlimited$62230/one-time
- Unlimited KPI measures and events
- All engines must run on one server or dedicated VM
- First year of maintenance included
- Distributed$128450/one-time
- Unlimited measures with engines distributed across multiple servers
- Required for multi-server and multi-site deployments
- Available as an annual subscription at 34,250 USD instead
Ignition
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ignition review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Flow Software if
- You need calculation engine.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want measure model.
Choose Ignition if
- You need unlimited-client licensing.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- You also want scada and hmi.
Questions people ask
- Is Flow Software or Ignition better?
- Neither clearly leads. Flow Software starts at $11390/one-time and Ignition at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Flow Software or Ignition?
- Flow Software starts at $11390/one-time and Ignition at On request.
- Does Flow Software or Ignition run on more platforms?
- Flow Software runs on Windows, Web. Ignition runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Web.
- What is Flow Software best used for?
- Flow Software is most often used for a brewery replacing a fragile network of oee spreadsheets with governed calculations from the same historian data, reporting specific energy consumption per tonne against an iso 50001 audit where the calculation method must be documented, feeding power bi plant dashboards from a historian without giving analysts direct tag-level access, a site that needs lab results typed in and combined with automated tag data in the same yield calculation. Of those, a brewery replacing a fragile network of oee spreadsheets with governed calculations from the same historian data and reporting specific energy consumption per tonne against an iso 50001 audit where the calculation method must be documented are not what Ignition is typically brought in for.
- What can Flow Software do that Ignition cannot?
- Flow Software covers Calculation engine, Measure model, Historian connectors, Manual data entry. Ignition covers Unlimited-client licensing, SCADA and HMI, Historian, MES modules.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Flow Software: Does Flow publish real prices?
Yes. Starter is 11,390 USD perpetual for 250 measures, Unlimited is 62,230 USD perpetual or 16,595 USD a year, and Distributed is 128,450 USD perpetual or 34,250 USD a year.
Ignition: What does Ignition cost?
It publishes per-server module pricing with unlimited clients, tags and connections, so cost does not scale with how many people use it.
Flow Software: Is perpetual licensing still offered?
Yes, at every tier, with the first year of maintenance included and renewal at roughly fifteen percent per year. Subscription is available on Unlimited and Distributed only.
Ignition: Why does unlimited-client licensing matter?
Traditional SCADA is licensed per tag or per screen, which turns adding an operator terminal into a purchase. Ignition removes that ceiling.
Flow Software: Do I need a historian as well?
Effectively yes. Flow reads from historians, databases and OPC sources; it is a calculation layer, not a data collector.
Ignition: Is it a finished application?
No, it is a platform. Screens, tags and logic are built for the specific plant, which is real engineering work.
Flow Software: What counts as a measure?
Each configured KPI or event definition. A single line typically consumes ten to thirty, which is what makes the 250 Starter cap tighter than it looks.
Related pages
More on Flow Software
Other head to heads
- Flow Software vs Sight Machine
- Flow Software vs Tulip
- Flow Software vs TrakSYS
- Flow Software vs Guidewheel
- Flow Software vs Prodsmart
- Flow Software vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Flow Software vs Authentise
- Flow Software vs Seeq
- Flow Software vs AVEVA System Platform
- Flow Software vs Oqton
- Flow Software vs ProShop ERP
- Flow Software vs Paperless Parts
- Flow Software vs Petasense
- Flow Software vs Poseidon Systems
- Flow Software vs PROGNOST Systems
- Flow Software vs Propel
- Flow Software vs GENESIS Version 11
- Flow Software vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Flow Software vs ABB 800xA
- Flow Software vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Flow Software vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Flow Software vs Litmus Edge
- Flow Software vs Kepware Server
- Flow Software vs Oden Technologies
- Flow Software vs 3YOURMIND
- Flow Software vs AMFG
- Flow Software vs Aras Innovator
- Flow Software vs Arena PLM
- Ignition vs Sight Machine
- Ignition vs Tulip
- Ignition vs TrakSYS
- Ignition vs Guidewheel
- Ignition vs Prodsmart
- Ignition vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Ignition vs Authentise
- Ignition vs Seeq
- Ignition vs AVEVA System Platform
- Ignition vs Oqton
- Ignition vs ProShop ERP
- Ignition vs Paperless Parts
- Ignition vs Petasense
- Ignition vs Poseidon Systems
- Ignition vs PROGNOST Systems
- Ignition vs Propel
- Ignition vs GENESIS Version 11
- Ignition vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Ignition vs ABB 800xA
- Ignition vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Ignition vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Ignition vs Litmus Edge
- Ignition vs Kepware Server
- Ignition vs Oden Technologies
- Ignition vs 3YOURMIND
- Ignition vs AMFG
- Ignition vs Aras Innovator
- Ignition vs Arena PLM
