Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs WhatFont

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; WhatFont can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, WhatFont covers Font detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and WhatFont actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | WhatFont |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Firefox | Chrome, Firefox, Arc |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in WhatFont
- Font detection
- Typography info
- Service detection
- Hover inspection
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Safari support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot WhatFont
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot WhatFont
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot WhatFont
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot WhatFont
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot WhatFont
WhatFont
- Identifying typefaces used on competitor websites for design researchnot FireMonkey
- Sourcing font inspiration from high-performing landing pagesnot FireMonkey
- Discovering web font services like Google Fonts or Typekit on sitesnot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
WhatFont
- Can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- Does not work on images with embedded text or rasterized typography
- Limited to inspecting single text elements at a time
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
WhatFont
Free- FreeFree
- Font inspection on any website
- Font family identification
- Font size and weight detection
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose WhatFont if
- You need font detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- You also want typography info.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or WhatFont better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or WhatFont?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or WhatFont run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. WhatFont runs on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what WhatFont is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that WhatFont cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. WhatFont covers Font detection, Typography info, Service detection, Hover inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceWhatFont: How do I use WhatFont to inspect fonts?
Click the WhatFont icon in your browser toolbar to activate it, then hover over any text on a webpage to see the font name and details in a pop-up. Click the text to reveal additional information like font style, weight, color, and font samples.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceWhatFont: What browsers does WhatFont support?
WhatFont works on Google Chrome, Firefox, and Arc browser. It is available as a free extension in each browser's extension store.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceWhatFont: Is WhatFont free?
Yes. WhatFont is a completely free browser extension with no paid tier or premium features. It is maintained as a free tool for designers and developers.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- FireMonkey vs ColorZilla
- FireMonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- FireMonkey vs JSON Viewer
- FireMonkey vs Instapaper
- FireMonkey vs BuiltWith
- FireMonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- WhatFont vs Greasemonkey
- WhatFont vs Violentmonkey
- WhatFont vs Tampermonkey
- WhatFont vs Userscripts
- WhatFont vs Stay
- WhatFont vs GoFullPage
- WhatFont vs Stylus
- WhatFont vs Pocket
- WhatFont vs Dark Reader
- WhatFont vs Raindrop.io
- WhatFont vs Privacy Badger
- WhatFont vs AdBlock Plus
- WhatFont vs Night Eye
- WhatFont vs React Developer Tools
- WhatFont vs Save to Google Drive
- WhatFont vs Vimeo Record
- WhatFont vs Vue.js Devtools
- WhatFont vs Awesome Screenshot
- WhatFont vs ColorZilla
- WhatFont vs Evernote Web Clipper
- WhatFont vs JSON Viewer
- WhatFont vs Instapaper
- WhatFont vs BuiltWith
- WhatFont vs Hemingway Editor

