Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs JSON Viewer

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; JSON Viewer the project is MIT licensed open source code hosted on GitHub with no vendor and no paid tier
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, JSON Viewer covers JSON formatting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and JSON Viewer actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | JSON Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | free |
| Platforms | Firefox | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in JSON Viewer
- JSON formatting
- Syntax highlighting
- Tree view
- Search functionality
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot JSON Viewer
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot JSON Viewer
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot JSON Viewer
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot JSON Viewer
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot JSON Viewer
JSON Viewer
No use cases recorded yet. See the JSON Viewer review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
JSON Viewer
- The project is MIT licensed open source code hosted on GitHub with no vendor and no paid tier
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
JSON Viewer
Free- FreeFree
- Syntax highlighting
- Collapsible tree
- Search
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose JSON Viewer if
- You need json formatting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want syntax highlighting.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or JSON Viewer better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and JSON Viewer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or JSON Viewer?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and JSON Viewer at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or JSON Viewer run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. JSON Viewer runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what JSON Viewer is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that JSON Viewer cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. JSON Viewer covers JSON formatting, Syntax highlighting, Tree view, Search functionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
More on JSON Viewer
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Wappalyzer
- FireMonkey vs BuiltWith
- FireMonkey vs Web Developer
- FireMonkey vs Redux DevTools
- FireMonkey vs WhatFont
- FireMonkey vs Mercury Reader
- FireMonkey vs Momentum
- FireMonkey vs ProWritingAid
- FireMonkey vs Rakuten
- FireMonkey vs uBlock Origin
- JSON Viewer vs Greasemonkey
- JSON Viewer vs Violentmonkey
- JSON Viewer vs Tampermonkey
- JSON Viewer vs Userscripts
- JSON Viewer vs Stay
- JSON Viewer vs GoFullPage
- JSON Viewer vs Stylus
- JSON Viewer vs Pocket
- JSON Viewer vs Dark Reader
- JSON Viewer vs Raindrop.io
- JSON Viewer vs Privacy Badger
- JSON Viewer vs AdBlock Plus
- JSON Viewer vs Night Eye
- JSON Viewer vs React Developer Tools
- JSON Viewer vs Save to Google Drive
- JSON Viewer vs Vimeo Record
- JSON Viewer vs Vue.js Devtools
- JSON Viewer vs Wappalyzer
- JSON Viewer vs BuiltWith
- JSON Viewer vs Web Developer
- JSON Viewer vs Redux DevTools
- JSON Viewer vs WhatFont
- JSON Viewer vs Mercury Reader
- JSON Viewer vs Momentum
- JSON Viewer vs ProWritingAid
- JSON Viewer vs Rakuten
- JSON Viewer vs uBlock Origin

