Browser Extensions · head to head
Tampermonkey vs WhatFont
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tampermonkey only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use; WhatFont can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- They diverge on capability: Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, WhatFont covers Font detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tampermonkey and WhatFont actually diverge.
| Attribute | Tampermonkey | WhatFont |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android | Chrome, Firefox, Arc |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tampermonkey
- Userscript management
- Script editor
- Auto-update
- Cloud sync
- Opera support
Only in WhatFont
- Font detection
- Typography info
- Service detection
- Hover inspection
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
- Safari support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tampermonkey
- Auto-run custom JavaScript to add features to specific websitesnot WhatFont
- Block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscriptsnot WhatFont
- Run scripts sourced from Greasy Fork or similar userscript repositoriesnot WhatFont
- Automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scriptsnot WhatFont
WhatFont
- Identifying typefaces used on competitor websites for design researchnot Tampermonkey
- Sourcing font inspiration from high-performing landing pagesnot Tampermonkey
- Discovering web font services like Google Fonts or Typekit on sitesnot Tampermonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tampermonkey
- Only source code up to version 2.9 is GPLv3; all newer versions are distributed under a proprietary license despite the extension itself being free to use
- Under Manifest V3, GM_webRequest is not (yet) supported
- Under Manifest V3, GM_xmlhttpRequest fires only one progress event instead of streaming progress, requiring a responseType: 'stream' workaround
- Since v5.3.2, Chrome/Edge (MV3) requires the user to manually enable Developer Mode, or from Chrome 138+ a per-extension 'Allow User Scripts' toggle, before any userscript will run
WhatFont
- Can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- Does not work on images with embedded text or rasterized typography
- Limited to inspecting single text elements at a time
Pricing, plan by plan
Tampermonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Tampermonkey review.
WhatFont
Free- FreeFree
- Font inspection on any website
- Font family identification
- Font size and weight detection
Which should you pick?
Choose Tampermonkey if
- You need userscript management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android.
- You also want script editor.
Choose WhatFont if
- You need font detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- You also want typography info.
Questions people ask
- Is Tampermonkey or WhatFont better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tampermonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tampermonkey or WhatFont?
- Tampermonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free.
- Does Tampermonkey or WhatFont run on more platforms?
- Tampermonkey runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Android. WhatFont runs on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- Can I use Tampermonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Tampermonkey best used for?
- Tampermonkey is most often used for auto-run custom javascript to add features to specific websites, block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscripts, run scripts sourced from greasy fork or similar userscript repositories, automate repetitive web tasks such as form-filling or redirect skipping via installed scripts. Of those, auto-run custom javascript to add features to specific websites and block ads, remove clutter, or reformat page layout via community/personal userscripts are not what WhatFont is typically brought in for.
- What can Tampermonkey do that WhatFont cannot?
- Tampermonkey covers Userscript management, Script editor, Auto-update, Cloud sync. WhatFont covers Font detection, Typography info, Service detection, Hover inspection. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support, Safari support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tampermonkey: How much does Tampermonkey cost?
Tampermonkey is completely free for all versions and across all supported browsers including Chrome, Edge, Safari, Opera, and Firefox.
SourceWhatFont: How do I use WhatFont to inspect fonts?
Click the WhatFont icon in your browser toolbar to activate it, then hover over any text on a webpage to see the font name and details in a pop-up. Click the text to reveal additional information like font style, weight, color, and font samples.
SourceTampermonkey: Is Tampermonkey available on all browsers?
Yes, Tampermonkey is available on Chrome 120 and later, Microsoft Edge, Safari, Opera Next, and Firefox with no cost.
SourceWhatFont: What browsers does WhatFont support?
WhatFont works on Google Chrome, Firefox, and Arc browser. It is available as a free extension in each browser's extension store.
SourceWhatFont: Is WhatFont free?
Yes. WhatFont is a completely free browser extension with no paid tier or premium features. It is maintained as a free tool for designers and developers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Tampermonkey
Other head to heads
- Tampermonkey vs Stylus
- Tampermonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Tampermonkey vs Pocket
- Tampermonkey vs Dark Reader
- Tampermonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Tampermonkey vs Violentmonkey
- Tampermonkey vs Arc
- Tampermonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- Tampermonkey vs Web Developer
- Tampermonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Tampermonkey vs Keeper
- Tampermonkey vs Momentum
- Tampermonkey vs Night Eye
- Tampermonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Tampermonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Tampermonkey vs Vimeo Record
- Tampermonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- Tampermonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Tampermonkey vs ColorZilla
- Tampermonkey vs JSON Viewer
- Tampermonkey vs BuiltWith
- Tampermonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Tampermonkey vs Rakuten
- Tampermonkey vs Wappalyzer
- Tampermonkey vs Fireshot
- Tampermonkey vs GoFullPage
- Tampermonkey vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Tampermonkey vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Tampermonkey vs Redux DevTools
- WhatFont vs Stylus
- WhatFont vs Raindrop.io
- WhatFont vs Pocket
- WhatFont vs Dark Reader
- WhatFont vs Privacy Badger
- WhatFont vs Violentmonkey
- WhatFont vs Arc
- WhatFont vs AdBlock Plus
- WhatFont vs Web Developer
- WhatFont vs Evernote Web Clipper
- WhatFont vs Keeper
- WhatFont vs Momentum
- WhatFont vs Night Eye
- WhatFont vs React Developer Tools
- WhatFont vs Save to Google Drive
- WhatFont vs Vimeo Record
- WhatFont vs Vue.js Devtools
- WhatFont vs Awesome Screenshot
- WhatFont vs ColorZilla
- WhatFont vs JSON Viewer
- WhatFont vs BuiltWith
- WhatFont vs Mercury Reader
- WhatFont vs Rakuten
- WhatFont vs Wappalyzer
- WhatFont vs Fireshot
- WhatFont vs GoFullPage
- WhatFont vs HTTPS Everywhere
- WhatFont vs Nimbus Screenshot
- WhatFont vs Redux DevTools


